Detection of Malingering during Head Injury Litigation

  • Cecil R. Reynolds

Part of the Critical Issues in Neuropsychology book series (CINP)

Table of contents

  1. Front Matter
    Pages iii-xii
  2. David Faust, Margaret A. Ackley
    Pages 1-54
  3. Juan Manuel Gutiérrez, Ruben C. Gur
    Pages 81-104
  4. J. Michael Williams
    Pages 105-132
  5. Charles J. Golden, Christine A. Grier
    Pages 133-162
  6. David T. R. Berry, James N. Butcher
    Pages 209-238
  7. Lawrence C. Hartlage
    Pages 239-260
  8. Back Matter
    Pages 287-291

About this book


Neuropsychologists and forensic psychologists have long lacked a systematic, scientific means of assessing head injury cases, of distinguishing those plaintiffs whose pain and suffering is real and deserves just compensation from those who are simply faking it. Cecil R. Reynolds and his expert contributors provide the first definitive work on this subject, focusing on problems that beset clinicians who are called upon to evaluate head injuries in civil courts. They describe the major malingering detection techniques currently in use.


Brain Injury Focusing Head Injury Head Injury Litigation Malingering

Editors and affiliations

  • Cecil R. Reynolds
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Educational PsychologyTexas A&M UniversityCollege StationUSA

Bibliographic information

  • DOI
  • Copyright Information Springer-Verlag US 1998
  • Publisher Name Springer, Boston, MA
  • eBook Packages Springer Book Archive
  • Print ISBN 978-1-4419-7468-6
  • Online ISBN 978-1-4419-7469-3
  • Series Print ISSN 1572-4565
  • Buy this book on publisher's site