Advertisement

Application of Action Selection, Information Gathering, and Information Evaluation Technologies to UAV Target Tracking

  • David C. Han
  • Jisun Park
  • Karen Fullam
  • K. Suzanne Barber
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 3890)

Abstract

This paper illustrates agent technologies applied to unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) target tracking. The combination of the three technologies presented in this paper provide UAVs with functionality needed for coordinated autonomous operation, from building up accurate beliefs, efficiently gathering information, to acting rationally. In the UAV target tracking domain, communication among agents is necessary for building beliefs about target locations. Reliable information provisioning networks are constructed through selection of appropriate information sources and trust evaluations are applied to belief revision. Also, a macro-based action selection scheme is deployed for efficient coordination of the target tracking activity among agents.

Keywords

Target Location Multiagent System Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Action Selection Target Tracking 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Lane, T., Kaelbling, L.P.: Nearly deterministic abstractions of markov decision processes. In: Eighteenth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI 2002), Edmonton, Alberta, Canada, pp. 260–266 (2002)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Han, D.C., Barber, K.S.: Desire-space analysis and action selection for multiple dynamic goals. In: Leite, J., Torroni, P. (eds.) CLIMA 2004. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3487, pp. 249–264. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Castelfranchi, C.: Guarantees for autonomy in cognitive agent architecture. In: Wooldridge, M.J., Jennings, N.R. (eds.) ECAI 1994 and ATAL 1994. LNCS, vol. 890, pp. 56–70. Springer, Heidelberg (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Park, J., Barber, K.S.: Information quality assurance by lazy exploration of information sources combination space in open multi-agent systems. Journal of Universal Computer Science 11, 193–209 (2005)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Fullam, K., Barber, K.S.: Using policies for information valuation to justify beliefs. In: Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Autonomous and Multi- Agent Systems (AAMAS 2004), New York City, pp. 404–411 (2004)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Russell, S., Norvig, P.: Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs (1995)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Holland, J.H.: Adaptation in Natural and Artificial Systems. The University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor (1975)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Jonker, C.M., Treur, J.: Formal analysis of models for the dynamics of trust based experiences. In: Proceedings of 9th European Workshop on Modelling Autonomous Agents in a Multi-Agent World: Multi-Agent System Engineering, pp. 221–232 (1999)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Sen, S., Sajja, N.: Robustness of reputation-based trust: Boolean case. In: Proceedings of the First International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, Bologna, Italy, pp. 288–293 (2002)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Yu, B., Singh, M.P.: An evidential model of distributed reputation management. In: Proceedings of The First International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, Bologna, Italy, pp. 294–301 (2002)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Barber, K.S., Park, J.: Agent belief autonomy in open multi-agent systems. In: Nickles, M., Rovatsos, M., Weiss, G. (eds.) AUTONOMY 2003. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2969, pp. 7–16. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • David C. Han
    • 1
  • Jisun Park
    • 1
  • Karen Fullam
    • 1
  • K. Suzanne Barber
    • 1
  1. 1.The Laboratory for Intelligent Processes and Systems, Electrical and Computer Engineering DepartmentThe University of Texas at AustinUSA

Personalised recommendations