Dystopia Redux: Science Fiction Cinema and Biopolitics

  • Mariano PazEmail author


In this chapter, Paz presents an overview of European science fiction (sf) cinema in the twenty-first century. He argues that the production of sf films in Europe has increased significantly over the past two decades, resulting in a body of works that occupies a middle ground between the blockbuster and the art film. Emphasising the links between sf and dystopia, and drawing on the theoretical framework of biopolitics, the chapter shows how sf films convey social concerns and anxieties about problems that dominate cultural and political debates in Europe, such as immigration, social control, and identity. The chapter concludes with a case study of Yorgos Lanthimos’ The Lobster (2015).


  1. Agamben, Giorgio. 1998. Homo Sacer: Sovereign Power and Bare Life. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  2. ———. 2005. State of Exception. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  3. Behzat Sharpe, Kenan. 2016. The Lobster: Debt, Referenda, and False Choices. Blind Field: A Journal of Cultural Enquiry, July.
  4. Bergfelder, Tim. 2005. National, Transnational or Supranational Cinema? Rethinking European Film Studies. Media, Culture & Society 27 (3): 315–331. Scholar
  5. Cadwell, Shelby. 2018. The Lobster by Yorgos Lanthimos (Review). Science Fiction Film and Television 11 (1): 136–139.Google Scholar
  6. Chaudhary, Zahid R. 2009. Humanity Adrift: Race, Materiality, and Allegory in Alfonso Cuarón’s Children of Men. Camera Obscura 24 (3): 73–109.Google Scholar
  7. Claeys, Gregory. 2018. Dystopia: A Natural History. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Combe, Kirk. 2015. Homeland Insecurity: Macho Globalization and Alien Blowback in Monsters. Journal of Popular Culture 48: 1010–1029. Scholar
  9. Cooper, Sarah. 2016. Narcissus and The Lobster (Yorgos Lanthimos, 2015). Studies in European Cinema 13 (2): 163–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Donadio, Rachel. 2017. Valerian Is France’s Most Expensive Film Ever. Luc Besson Says ‘Who Cares?’ New York Times, July 19.
  11. Foucault, Michel. 1991. Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  12. ———. 2000. Power: Essential Works of Michel Foucault 1954–1984. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  13. ———. 2008. The Birth of Biopolitics: Lectures at the Collège de France 1978–1979. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  14. Hantke, Steffen. 2016. The State of the State of Emergency: Life under Alien Occupation in Gareth Edwards’ Monsters. AAA: Arbeiten aus Anglistik und Amerikanistik 41 (1): 25–38.Google Scholar
  15. Liz, Mariana. 2016. Euro-Visions: Europe in Contemporary Cinema. London: Bloomsbury.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Moylan, Tom. 2000. Scraps of the Untainted Sky: Science Fiction, Utopia, Dystopia. Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  17. Rabinow, Paul, and Nikolas Rose. 2006. Biopower Today. BioSocieties 1 (2): 195–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Sargent, Lyman Tower. 1994. The Three Faces of Utopianism. Utopian Studies 5 (1): 1–37.Google Scholar
  19. Sontag, Susan. 1967. The Imagination of Disaster. In Against Interpretation and other Essays, 209–225. London: Eyre & Spottiswoode.Google Scholar
  20. Suvin, Darko. 1979. Metamorphoses of Science Fiction: On the Poetics and History of a Literary Genre. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Telotte, J.P. 2001. Science Fiction Film. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. The Numbers. n.d. The Lobster (2015). Accessed 30 October 2018.
  23. Trimble, Sarah. 2011. Maternal Back/Grounds in Children of Men: Notes Toward an Arendtian Biopolitics. Science Fiction Film and Television 4 (2): 249–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Modern Languages and Applied LinguisticsUniversity of LimerickLimerickIreland

Personalised recommendations