Advertisement

Questioning the ‘Normality Drama’: The Representation of Disability in Contemporary European Films

  • Eleanor Andrews
Chapter
  • 7 Downloads

Abstract

In film and television, even in the twenty-first century and in Europe, disability is frequently under- or misrepresented. This chapter focuses on three European films, which have, as their theme, the life of a physically disabled character: The Sea Inside (Alejandro Amenábar 2004), The Diving Bell and the Butterfly (Julian Schnabel 2007) and Untouchable (Olivier Nakache and Éric Toledano 2011). The discourse of disability in these films follows a trajectory, which is examined in relation to Paul Darke’s (Understanding Cinematic Representations of Disability. In The Disability Reader, ed. Tom Shakespeare, 181–197. London: Cassell, 1998) notion of the ‘normality drama’, where the filmic depiction of the disabled character emphasises the representation of normality rather than impairment. All three are based on true-life narratives, wherein the disabled person manages to achieve a goal in life in spite of their many difficulties.

References

  1. Abidi, Javed, et al. 2012. Disabled Peoples’ International. http://www.disabledpeoplesinternational.org. Accessed 22 August 2018.
  2. Altman, Rick. 1987. The American Film Musical. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Aristotle. 1997. Poetics, Trans. Samuel Henry Butcher. Mineola, NY: Dover Publications Inc.Google Scholar
  4. Arnold, Beth. 2008. The Truth About “The Diving Bell and the Butterfly”. Salon. February 23. https://www.salon.com/2008/02/23/diving_bell_2/. Accessed 11 August 2018.
  5. Bass, David. 1997. Insiders and Outsiders: Latent Urban Thinking in Movies of Modern Rome. In Cinema & Architecture: Méliès, Mallet-Stevens, Multimedia, ed. François Penz and Maureen Thomas, 84–99. London: British Film Institute Publishing.Google Scholar
  6. Browne, Thomas. 1963 [1643]. In Religio Medici, ed. James Winny. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Brylla, Catalin, and Helen Hughes. 2016. Documentary and Disability. Colchester: Routledge.Google Scholar
  8. Caruth, Cathy, ed. 1995. Trauma: Explorations in Memory. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Chivers, Sally, and Nicole Markotić. 2010. The Problem Body: Projecting Disability on Film. Columbus: Ohio State University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Clarke, Alastair. 2008. Pattern Recognition Theory of Humour: An Outline. Cumbria: Pyrrhic House.Google Scholar
  11. Custen, George F. 1992. Bio/Pics: How Hollywood Constructed Public History. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Darke, Paul. 1998. Understanding Cinematic Representations of Disability. In The Disability Reader, ed. Tom Shakespeare, 181–197. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
  13. Dumas, Alexandre. [1884]; 1997. The Count of Monte Cristo. London: Wordsworth Editions.Google Scholar
  14. Fraser, Benjamin. 2013. Disability Studies and Spanish Culture. Liverpool: Liverpool University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. ———, ed. 2016. Cultures of Representation: Disability in World Cinema Contexts. New York: Wallflower Press.Google Scholar
  16. Freud, Sigmund. 1976 [1905]. Jokes and Their Relation to the Unconscious, Trans. James Strachy. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  17. Hall, Stuart. 1997. The Spectacle of the ‘Other’. In Representation: Cultural Representations and Signifying Practices, ed. Stuart Hall, 223–290. London: Sage Publications Ltd.Google Scholar
  18. Holden, Lisa, and Fran Pheasant-Kelly. 2016. Freak-Show Aesthetics and the Politics of Disfigurement: Reconfiguring the Cinematic Terrorist in the Post 9/11 Era. In Reflecting 9/11: New Narratives in Literature, Television, Film and Theatre, ed. V. Bryan, A. Keeble, and H. Pope, 195–212. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Press.Google Scholar
  19. Hunt, Paul. 1998. A Critical Condition. In The Disability Reader: Social Science Perspectives, ed. Tom Shakespeare, 7–19. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
  20. Klobas, Lauri E. 1988. Disability Drama in Television and Film. Jefferson: McFarland & Company Inc. Publishers.Google Scholar
  21. Lombroso, Cesare. 2006. Criminal Man, Trans. Mary Gibson and Nicole Hahn Rafter. Durham and London: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Longmore, Paul K. 2003. Screening Stereotypes: Images of Disabled People in Television and Motion Pictures. In Why I Burned My Book and Other Essays on Disability, ed. Paul K. Longmore, 131–146. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Markotić, Nicole. 2016. Disability in Film and Literature. Jefferson, NC: McFarland and Company Inc.Google Scholar
  24. Marr, Matthew J. 2013. The Politics of Age and Disability in Contemporary Spanish Film: Plus Ultra Pluralism. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  25. Mogk, Marja Evelyn, ed. 2013. Different Bodies: Essays on Disability in Film and Television. Jefferson, NC: McFarland & Co.Google Scholar
  26. Morreall, John. 2008. Philosophy and Religion. In The Primer of Humor Research, ed. Victor Raskin, 211–241. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Norden, Martin F. 1994. The Cinema of Isolation: A History of Physical Disability in the Movies. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Oliver, Michael. 1983. Social Work with Disabled People. London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. ———. 1990. The Politics of Disablement. London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Raskin, Victor, ed. 2008. The Primer of Humor Research. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  31. Rieser, Richard. 2004. Disabling Imagery?: A Teaching Guide to Disability and Moving Image Media. London: BFI Education.Google Scholar
  32. Shakespeare, Tom, ed. 1998. The Disability Reader. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
  33. Todorov, Tzvetan. 1977. The Politics of Prose, Trans. Richard Howard. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Wilde, Alison. 2016. Cultures of Representation: Disability in World Cinema Contexts. Disability & Society 1: 1313–1315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Wright, Alexa. 2013. Monstrosity: The Human Monster in Visual Culture. London and New York: I.B. Tauris.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Eleanor Andrews
    • 1
  1. 1.University of WolverhamptonWolverhamptonUK

Personalised recommendations