Advertisement

Anti-competitive Investor Behaviour and Illegal Investments in Investment Treaty Arbitration

  • Elena BelovaEmail author
Chapter
  • 22 Downloads
Part of the European Yearbook of International Economic Law book series (EUROYEAR)

Abstract

Anti-competitive behaviour on the part of investors can lead to breaches of the host state legal order and cause market distortions. This chapter discusses the legal consequences of such behaviour within the framework of investment treaty arbitration and aims to show that anti-competitive strategies may lead to breaches not only of competition law, but also of a variety of host state national laws and regulations. It consequently proposes the adoption of a functional definition of anti-competitive actions that taint investments with illegality and explores the ways in which such investments may be excluded from the protection offered by bilateral investment treaties (BITs). The study of recent case law tends to show that investors are likely to face the consequences of their anti-competitive conduct in investment treaty arbitration. Two main hypotheses are explored: first, the issue of illegality when the BIT in question contains a specific legality requirement, and second, the possibility for states to rely on international law when challenging investors’ anti-competitive behaviour.

Keywords

Competition law Investment arbitration Anti-competitive behaviour Illegality of investments “In accordance with laws” clause Rule of law International public policy 

References

  1. Alvarez JE (2011) The public international law regime governing international investment. In: Collected courses of The Hague Academy of International Law, The Hague Academy of International Law, vol 344Google Scholar
  2. Aydin U, Büthe T (2016) Competition law & policy in developing countries: explaining variations in outcomes; exploring possibilities and limits. Law Contemp Probl 79:1–36Google Scholar
  3. Betz K (2017) Economic crime in international arbitration. ASA Bull 35(2):281–292Google Scholar
  4. Bottini G (2010) Legality of investments under ICSID jurisprudence. In: Waibel M, Kaushal A et al (eds) The backlash against investment arbitration. Kluwer Law International, pp 297–314Google Scholar
  5. Dhall V (2008) Competition law and consumer protection — insights into their interrelationship. In: Qaqaya H, Lipimile G (eds) The effects of anti-competitive business practices on developing countries and their development prospects. UNCTAD. http://unctad.org/en/docs/ditcclp20082_en.pdf
  6. Douglas Z (2014) The plea of illegality in investment treaty arbitration. ICSID Rev Foreign Invest Law J 29:155–186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. El Gawhary M (2015) Reflections on recent ICSID arbitral awards in which the “illegality of the investment” defense was raised by the host State. In: Leboulanger P, Abdel Raouf M, Ziadé NG (eds) Festschrift Ahmed Sadek El-Kosheri. Kluwer Law International, pp 299–324Google Scholar
  8. Forteau M (2011) L’ordre public international face à l’enchevêtrement croissant du droit international privé et du droit international public. Journal du droit international (Clunet) 1:3–49Google Scholar
  9. Fry JD (2009) Désordre Public International under the New York Convention: wither truly international public policy. Chin J Int Law 8:81–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gaillard E, Savage J (eds) (1999) Fouchard Gaillard Goldman on international commercial arbitration. Kluwer Law InternationalGoogle Scholar
  11. Hayek FA (1960) The constitution of liberty. The University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  12. Jagusch S (2014) Issues of substantive transnational public policy. In: Bray D, Bray HL (eds) International arbitration and public policy, pp 23–45Google Scholar
  13. Khemani RS, Shapiro DM (1993) Glossary of industrial organisation economics and competition law. OECD. http://www.oecd.org/regreform/sectors/2376087.pdf
  14. Kryvoi Y (2018) Economic crimes in international investment law. Int Comp Law Q 67:577–605CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Lalive P (1987) Transnational (or truly international) public policy and international arbitration. In: Sanders P (ed) Comparative arbitration practice and public policy in arbitration, ICCA Congress Series 1986, vol 3. Kluwer Law International, New York, pp 258–318Google Scholar
  16. Lamm C, Greenwald B, Young K (2014) From “World Duty Free” to “Metal-Tech”: a review of international investment treaty arbitration cases involving allegations of corruption. ICSID Rev Foreign Invest Law J 29:328–349CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Llamzon A (2014) Corruption in international investment arbitration. Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
  18. Llamzon A, Sinclair AC (2015) Investor wrongdoing in investment arbitration: standards governing issues of corruption, fraud, misrepresentation and other investor misconduct. In: van den Berg A (ed) Legitimacy: myths, realities, challenges, ICCA Congress Series, vol 18. Kluwer Law International, pp 451–530Google Scholar
  19. Mehta PS, Mitra S, Dube C (2008) Competition policy and consumer policy: complementarities and conflicts in the promotion of consumer welfare. In: Qaqaya H, Lipimile G (eds) The effects of anti-competitive business practices on developing countries and their development prospects. UNCTAD. http://unctad.org/en/docs/ditcclp20082_en.pdf
  20. Moloo R, Khachaturian A (2011) The compliance with the law requirement in international investment law. Fordham Int Law J 34(6):1473–1501Google Scholar
  21. Newcombe A (2011) Investor misconduct: jurisdiction, admissibility or merits? In: Brown C, Miles K (eds) Evolution in investment treaty law and arbitration. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 187–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Obersteiner T (2014) “In accordance with domestic law” clauses: how international investment tribunals deal with allegations of unlawful conduct of investors. J Int Arbitr 31(2):265–288Google Scholar
  23. Pradhan S et al (2000) Anticorruption in transition: a contribution to the policy debate. World Bank. https://siteresources.worldbank.org/INTWBIGOVANTCOR/Resources/contribution.pdf
  24. Schill SW (2012) Illegal investments in investment treaty arbitration. Law Pract Int Courts Tribunals 11:281–323CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of LilleLilleFrance

Personalised recommendations