The Impact of EU State Aid Law on International Investment Law and Arbitration

  • Paschalis PaschalidisEmail author
Part of the European Yearbook of International Economic Law book series (EUROYEAR)


This chapter examines the overlap between European Union (EU) state aid law and international investment law and arbitration. First, it enquires whether there is a systemic incompatibility between the fair and equitable treatment (FET) standard and EU state aid law. This chapter focuses in particular on the principle of legitimate expectations and the manner that it was applied by several arbitral tribunals in relation to state aid measures. For the purposes of this enquiry, this chapter sets out the basic components of the notion of state aid under EU law and points out the severely restrictive application by the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) of the principle of legitimate expectations in the field of state aid. Second, this chapter examines whether arbitral awards granting damages to an investor can constitute, as such, incompatible and unlawful state aid. The chapter focuses on two key questions, namely whether arbitral awards can constitute an economic advantage and whether they are attributable to the member state in question. Third, this chapter looks at the issue of the fate of arbitral awards granting damages to investors in state aid matters. It examines what remedies are available to member states against such awards. In doing so, it takes into account the different legal regimes applicable to awards issued under the Convention on the Settlement of Investment Disputes between States and Nationals of Other States (ICSID Convention) and non-ICSID awards. It also examines the possibility of safeguarding the enforcement of ICSID awards that may be incompatible with EU law under Article 351 TFEU.


State aid Legitimate expectations Fair and equitable treatment Enforcement ICSID awards Economic advantage Imputability to the state State resources Article 351 TFEU Achmea Micula Novenergia 


  1. Alexandrov SA (2009) Enforcement of ICSID awards: Articles 53 and 54 of the ICSID convention. In: Binder C, Kriebaum U, Reinisch A, Wittich S (eds) International investment law for the 21st century: essays in honour of Christoph Schreuer. OUP, Oxford, pp 322–337CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Angelet N (2011) Fair and equitable treatment. In: Wolfrum R (dir) Max Planck Encyclopaedia of Public International Law, vol 3. OUP, Oxford, pp 1094–1103Google Scholar
  3. Bacon QC K (ed) (2017) European Union law of state aid, 3rd edn. OUP, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  4. Broches A (1972) The convention on the settlement of investment disputes between states and nationals of other states. Collect Courses Hague Acad Int Law 136:331–410Google Scholar
  5. de Stefano C (2019) The circulation of international investment awards under the New York Convention In: Fach Gómez K, López Rodríguez AM (eds) 60 years of the New York Convention: key issues and future challenges. Kluwer AH, Alpena an den Rijn, pp 441–455Google Scholar
  6. Demirkol B (2018) Judicial acts and investment treaty arbitration. CUP, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Hofmann H, Micheau C (eds) (2016) State aid law of the European Union. OUP, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  8. Káposznyák A (2019) The expanding role of the New York Convention in enforcement of international investment arbitral awards In: Fach Gómez K, López Rodríguez AM (eds) 60 years of the New York Convention: key issues and future challenges. Kluwer AH, Alpena an den Rijn, pp 425–440Google Scholar
  9. Kassim H, Lyons B (2013) The new political economy of EU state aid policy. J Ind Compet Trade 13:1–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Kläger R (2011) “Fair and Equitable Treatment” in International Investment Law. CUP, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. McLachlan C, Shore L, Weiniger M (2017) International investment arbitration: substantive principles, 2nd edn. OUP, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  12. Paschalidis P (2018) International investment law and EU law: are there systemic conflicts and incompatibilities? In: Gaillard E, Ruiz Fabri H (eds) EU law and international investment arbitration, IAI Series No. 11. JURIS, Huntington, New York, pp 7–169Google Scholar
  13. Piernas López JJ (2015) The concept of state aid under EU law. OUP, OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Rusche TM (2015) EU renewable electricity law and policy: from national targets to a common market. CUP, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Scheuer Ch (2013) Investments, international protection. In: Wolfrum R (dir) Max Planck Encyclopaedia of Public International Law, vol 6. OUP, Oxford, pp 328–343Google Scholar
  16. Schreuer C, Malintoppi L, Reinisch A, Sinclair A (2009) The ICSID convention: a commentary, 2nd edn. CUP, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Tudor I (2008) The fair and equitable treatment standard in the international law of foreign investment. OUP, OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Wongkaew T (2019) Protection of legitimate expectations in investment treaty arbitration: a theory of detrimental reliance. CUP, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Shearman & Sterling LLPParisFrance

Personalised recommendations