Advertisement

On Regeneration

  • Thomas S. HellingEmail author
  • Daniel Azoulay
Chapter

Abstract

There would not be the fascination about liver surgery were it not for the fact that it is unique among human organs in its remarkable powers of restoration, a process we now call regeneration. It is not clear from a teleological standpoint why the liver possesses such properties. Some have claimed that with its central role in metabolic processes it was so endowed as to withstand the catastrophe of liver toxins in primitive mammals and primates. Indeed, the structure had a spiritual quality according to ancient Greeks. Metaphysically, in antiquity, for Plato and Aristotle, the liver represented the appetitive soul, whose function was to exhibit images expressed by the rational soul, more or less “a theater of prophetic representations” [2]. Whether the story of Prometheus indicated to the ancient Greeks that the liver could regenerate is not known. There seems to be no reference to it in former writings. Neither Hippocrates nor Galen ascribed this feature to the liver [3]. It was claimed an organ of “sanguification”—the making of blood—of hemostasis, of incorporation of foodstuffs for formation of blood, but no reference to regeneration can be found. Nevertheless, the Greek word for liver, ηπαρ (hepar = liver), seems to originate as a root from the word ηπαομαι (hepaomai), which means “to heal” or “to mend.” Were there anecdotal examples of regrowth of an avulsed and exposed liver? Perhaps so, although none can be found in written literature. The earliest scientific reference may be that of French anatomist Jean Cruveihier (1791–1874) who described a condition he termed hepar acinosum [5]:

References

  1. 1.
    Michalopoulos GK, DeFrances MC (1997) Liver regeneration. Science 276:60–66Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Grote G (1865) Plato, and the other companions of Sokrates. John Murray, London, p 287Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Coxe JR (1846) Writings of Hippocrates and Galen. Lindsay and Blakiston, PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Liddell HG, Scott R (1871) A lexicon abridged from Liddell and Scott’s Greek-English lexicon. Clarendon Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cruveilhier J (1845) Traite d’Anatomie Descriptive, Tome Troisieme. Maison Bechet Jeune, Paris, p 387Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ackermann T (1880) Ueber hypertrophische und atrophische Lebercirrhose. Archiv für pathologische Anatomie und Physiologie und für klinische Medicin 80:396–436Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Frerichs F (1861) Klinik der Leberkrankheiten, Bd II. Braunschweig, Friedrich Vieweg und Sohn, p 203Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ponfick E (1890) Ueber die Folgen einer theilweisen Entfernung der Leber. Jahres-Bericht der Schlesischen Gesellschaft:38–39Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ponfick E (1890) Experimentelle Beiträge zur Pathologie der Leber. Archiv für pathologische Anatomie und Physiologie 119:193–240Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Doyen E (1892) Quelques Operations sur le Foie et les Voies Biliares. Archives Provinciales de Chirurgie 1:149–178Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Marchand F (1895) Ueber Ausgang der Acuten Leberatrophie im Multiple Knotige Hyperplasia. Beitr z path Anat u z allg Path 17:206–219Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Muir R (1907) On proliferation of the cells of the liver. J Pathol 12:287–305Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Overturf K, Al-Dhalimy M, Ou C-N, Grompe M (1997) Serial transplantation reveals the stem-cell-like regenerative potential of adult mouse hepatocytes. Am J Pathol 151:1273–1280PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Higgins GM (1931) Experimental pathology of the liver: I. restoration of the liver of the white rat following partial surgical removal. Arch Pathol 12:186–202Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Rous PL (1920) Relation of the portal blood to liver maintenance: a demonstration of liver atrophy conditional on compensation. J Exp Med 31:609–632PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Schalm LS et al (1952) The regenerative power of the liver and its reserve capacity for excreting bile. Lancet 259:75–81Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Child CI (1953) Liver regeneration following portocaval transposition in dogs. Ann Surg 138:600–608PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Marchioro TP et al (1965) Physiologic requirements for auxiliary liver homotransplantation. Surg Gynecol Obstet 121:17–31PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Marchioro TP et al (1967) The effect of partial portacaval transposition on the canine liver. Surgery 61:723–732PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Halgrimson CG et al (1966) Auxiliary liver transplantation: effect of host portocaval shunt: experimental and clinical observations. Arch Surg 93:107–118PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Moolten FL, Bucher NLR (1967) Regeneration of rat liver: transfer of humoral agent by cross circulation. Science 158:272–274PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Starzl TE, Porter KA, Kashiwagi N (1975) Portal hepatotrophic factors, diabetes mellitus and acute liver atrophy, hypertrophy and regeneration. Surg Gynecol Obstet 141:843–858PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Bucher NL, Glinos AD (1950) The effect of age on regeneration of rat liver. Cancer Res 10:324–332PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Bucher NL, Scott JF, Aub JC (1951) Regeneration of the liver in parabiotic rats. Cancer Res 11:457–465PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Bucher NL (1963) Regeneration of mammalian liver. Int Rev Cytol 15:245–300PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Bucher NL, Patel U, Cohen S (1977) Hormonal factors concerned with liver regeneration. Ciba Found Symp 55:95–107Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Bucher NL, Swaffield MN (1976) Synergistic action of insulin and glucagon in hepatic regeneration. Lancet 1:646PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Bucher NL (1991) Liver regeneration: an overview. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 6:615–624PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Michalopoulos GK (2014) Advances in liver regeneration. Ex Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 8:897–907Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Lin T-Y, Chen C-C (1965) Metabolic function and regeneration of cirrhotic and non-cirrhotic livers after hepatic lobectomy in man. Ann Surg 162:959–972PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Lin T-Y, Lee C-S, Chen C-C et al (1979) Regeneration of human liver after hepatic lobectomy studied by repeated liver scanning and repeated needle biopsy. Ann Surg 190:48–53PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Golritz M, Majlesara A, Sakka SE et al (2016) Small for size and flow (SFSF) syndrome: an alternative description for posthepatectomy liver failure. Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol 40:267–275Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Tucker ON, Heaton N (2005) The ‘small for size’ liver syndrome. Curr Opin Crit Care 11:150–155PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Kawasaki SM et al (1998) Living related liver transplantation in adults. Ann Surg 227:269–274PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Hashikura YM et al (1994) Successful living-related partial liver transplantation to an adult patient. Lancet 343:1233–1234PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Kubota KM et al (1997) Measurement of liver volume and hepatic functional reserve as a guide to decision-making in Resectional surgery for hepatic tumors. Hepatology 26:1176–1181PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Van Thiel DH et al (1985) In vivo hepatic volume determination using sonography and computed tomography. Gastroenterology 88:1812–1817PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Makuuchi MT et al (1984) Preoperative transcatheter embolization of the portal venous branch for patients receiving extended lobectomy due to the bile duct carcinoma. J Jpn Surg Assoc 45:1558–1564Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Takayusu KM et al (1986) Hepatic lobar atrophy following obstruction of the ipsilateral portal vein from hilar cholangiocarcinoma. Radiology 160:389–393Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Makuuchi MT et al (1990) Preoperative portal embolization to increase safety of major hepatectomy for hilar bile duct carcinoma: a preliminary report. Surgery 107:521–527PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Azoulay DC et al (2000) Resection of nonresectable liver metastases from colorectal cancer after percutaneous portal vein embolization. Ann Surg 231:480–486PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Abulkhir AL et al (2008) Preoperative portal vein embolization for major liver resection. Ann Surg 247:49–57PubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Schnitzbauer AA et al (2012) Right portal vein ligation combined with in situ splitting induces rapid left lateral liver lobe hypertrophy enabling 2-staged extended right hepatic resection in small-for-size settings. Ann Surg 255:405–414PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Schadde EA-C et al (2014) Early survival and safety of ALPPS: first report of the international ALPPS registry. Ann Surg 260:829–838PubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Santibañes EC-A et al (2012) Playing play-Doh to prevent postoperative liver failure: the “ALPPS” approach. Ann Surg 255:415–417PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of Mississippi Medical CenterJacksonUSA
  2. 2.Centre Hépato-BiliaireHôpital Universitaire Paul BrousseVillejuifFrance

Personalised recommendations