Establishing a Link Between Meaning and Success Via PBL: Rethinking Entrepreneurship and Communication

  • Kim Malmbak MøllerEmail author
  • Mads Lauridsen
  • Jeppe Spedtsberg


This chapter seeks to explore the relationship between meaning, existential success, and validity in the lifeworld of individuals. We understand the current populist trends as a result, among other things, of the amount and the pace of information in postmodern societies. It appears as if it is not relevant whether statements are valid or not, if their invalidity is only exposed after their desired effect has occurred. Validity is challenged by the countless opportunities to address different markets in different ways. In regard to the success of a message, it appears that meaning and the emotional response created by a message are more important than the validity of the statement. The chapter analyses meaning in the lifeworld of entrepreneurs and students at Aalborg University since the existential success of entrepreneurs highly depends on their ability to create meaning for themselves and their surrounding collaborators. Because the entrepreneurs are all taught in Aalborg University’s problem-based learning model this pedagogy is included in the discussion. The analysis shows how meaning is created and how the relationship between meaning, validity, and success is dialectical and mutually dependent. Finally, based on the analysis, the chapter pinpoints elements that might serve as philosophical guidelines for validity in these populistic times.


  1. Birkler, Jacob. 2014. Videnskabsteori: En Grundbog. Philosophy of Science, 50–78. Copenhagen: Munksgaard.Google Scholar
  2. Bourdieu, Pierre. 1984. Distinction: A Social Critique of Judgement of Taste. Trans. Richard Nice. Cambridge, MA: Routledge & Kegan Paul/Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Costello, Peter R. 2005. Towards a Phenomenology of Gratitude: What Is ‘Pleasing’ in the Euthyphro. Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 79: 261–277. Google Scholar
  4. Darwall, Stephen L. 1977. Two Kinds of Respect. Ethics. JSTOR 88 (1): 36–49. Chicago: The Chicago Press. Accessed 1 Dec 2019.
  5. Drejer, Ina, Jacob Rubæk Holm, and Kristian Nielsen. 2014. Aalborg Universitets bidrag til udvikling i Region Nordjylland.Google Scholar
  6. Englander, Magnus. 2016. The Phenomenological Method in Qualitative Psychology and Psychiatry. International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-being 11 (1). Accessed 15 Dec 2019.
  7. Fast, Michael. 2016. Philosophical Perspective on Entrepreneurship. In The Palgrave Handbook of Multidisciplinary Perspectives on Entrepreneurship, ed. Romeo V. Turcan and Norman M. Fraser, 503–520. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  8. Fast, Michael, Frederik Hertel, and Woodrow W. Clark II. 2014. Economics as a Science of the Human Mind and Interaction. Theoretical Economics Letters 4: 477–487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gilje, Nils; Grimen, Harald (2002). “Samfundsvidenskabernes Forudsætninger: Indføring i samfundsvidenskabernes videnskabsfilosofi” (Prerequisites of Social Science: Introduction to Philosophy of Science in Social Sciences), 1st edition, Hans Reitzels Forlag, Copenhagen, pp. 50–73. ISBN: 978-87-412-2526-5Google Scholar
  10. Heidelbach, Lene Porsborg, Kirsten Bisgaard Kirchner, Henrik Kaagaard, David Stevens, Claudine Haza Jensen, Lise-Lotte Holmgreen, and Kirsten Jæger. 2001. Handbook of Project Writing. Aalborg: Uni Print Aalborg University.Google Scholar
  11. Husserl, Edmund. 1970a. Logical Investigations. Trans. J. N. Findlay. Ed. Dermot Moran. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  12. ———. 1970b. The Crisis of European Sciences and Transcendental Phenomenology”. Trans. David Carr. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
  13. ———. 1999. The Idea of Phenomenology. Berlin: Kluwer Academic Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kant, Immanuel. 1992. An Answer to the Question: What is Enlightenment? California: Hackett Publishing.Google Scholar
  15. Kriegel, Uriah. 2017. Dignity and the Phenomenology of Recognition-Respect. In Emotional Experiences: Ethical and Social Significance, ed. John J. Drummond and Sonja Rinofner-Kreidl, 121–136. London/New York: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
  16. Landström, Hans. 2008. Entrepreneurship Research: A Missing Link in our Understanding of the Knowledge Economy. Journal of Intellectual Capital 9 (2): 301–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Latour, Bruno. 2016. Why Gaia is Not the Globe – and Why our Future Depends on not Confusing the Two. Video Presentation, Aarhus University School of Culture and Society, 2 June. Aarhus University, Stakladen. Accessed 24 Mar 2019.
  18. Lerner, Rosemary. 2015. A Husserlian Phenomenology of Responsibility. A Husserlian Phenomenology of Responsibility 83: 113–124.Google Scholar
  19. Møller, Kim Malmbak. 2016. Erkendelse og Organisatorisk Praksis: At Undre Sig Over Mennesket. PhD diss., Aalborg Universitetsforlag. Accessed 2 Dec 2019.
  20. Ryan, Anne B. 2006. Post-Positivist Approaches to Research. In Researching and Writing Your Thesis: A Guide for Postgraduate Students, ed. Colin Fisher, 12–26. Maynooth: Mace.Google Scholar
  21. Schumpeter, Joesph. 1933. The Common Sense of Econometrics. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society 1 (1): 5–12. Accessed 22 Jan 2019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Shane, Scott. 2004. Academic Entrepreneurship: University Spinoffs and Wealth Creation. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. ———. 2009. Why Encouraging More People to Become Entrepreneurs is Bad Public Policy. Small Business Economics 33 (2): 141–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Spini, Dario. 2003. Measurement Equivalence of 10 Value Types from the Schwartz Value Survey Across 21 Countries. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 34 (1): 3–23. Accessed 30 Jan 2019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Thevenaz, Pierre, Paul T. Brockelman, Charles Courtney, and James M. Edie. 1962. What is Phenomenology? And Other Essays. Chicago: Quadrangle Books.Google Scholar
  26. Thomson, M. Guy. 2005. Phenomenology of Intersubjectivity: A Historical Overview of The Concept and Its Clinical Implications. Ed. Jon Mills. Hillsdale: Jason Aronson.Google Scholar
  27. Van de Ven, Andrew, and Marshall Poole. 2005. Alternative Approach for Studying Organizational Change. Organization Studies. Organization Studies 26 (9): 1377–1404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Weick, Karl E. 1995. Sensemaking in Organizations. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  29. ———. 2009. Making Sense of the Organization: The Impermanent Organization. London: John Wiley.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kim Malmbak Møller
    • 1
    Email author
  • Mads Lauridsen
    • 2
  • Jeppe Spedtsberg
    • 2
  1. 1.Aalborg UniversityAalborgDenmark
  2. 2.Copenhagen Business SchoolCopenhagenDenmark

Personalised recommendations