Making Sense of Emerging Populist Agendas

  • Peter ScottEmail author


This chapter tests the truth or falsehood of the populism narrative by examining first the multiple strands subsumed under the label of ‘populism’ (and their many inconsistencies and even contradictions) and then the multi-form heterogeneity of modern higher education (with perhaps as many inconsistencies). Populism is fuelled by opposition to elites, whether welfare-state or neoliberal, which populists claim have let ordinary people down. In its more extreme forms it amounts to a rejection of the liberal, secular and cosmopolitan values of modernity. In the eyes of many populists, universities are bastions of these elites, and a major source of these values. As a result, they appear to have been caught ‘on the wrong side of history’. For universities used to regarding themselves as at the cutting edge of progress this has been an uncomfortable experience. However misconceived, this populist critique cannot be brushed off. Instead, higher education should confront the populist challenge by redoubling its efforts to promote fairer access, a more inclusive curriculum and more flexible forms of learning and teaching, more open and democratic forms of research.


  1. Beck, Ulrich. 2000. What Is Globalization? Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  2. Becker, Saacha, Thomas Felzer, and Dennis Norris. 2017. Who Voted for Brexit? A Comprehensive District-Level Analysis. Economic Policy 32 (92): 601–650.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Boliver, Vikki. 2017. Misplaced Optimism: How Higher Education Reproduces Rather than Reduces Social Inequality. British Journal of the Sociology of Education 38 (3): 423–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Boliver, Vikki, Stephen Gorard, and Nadia Siddiqui. 2015. Will the Use of Contextual Indicators Make UK Higher Education Admissions Fairer? Educational Sciences 5 (4): 306–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brown, Phillip, and High Lauder. 2016. Higher Education, Knowledge Capitalism and the Global Auction for Jobs. In New Languages and Landscapes of Higher Education, ed. Peter Scott, Jim Gallacher, and Gareth Parry, 240–254. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Crouch, Colin. 2011. The Strange Non-Death of Neoliberalism. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  7. Etzkowitz, Henry. 2008. The Triple Helix: University-Industry-Government Innovation in Action. Abingdon/New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Florida, Richard. 2005. Cities and the Creative Class. Abingdon: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. ———. 2017. The New Urban Crisis: How our Cities Are Increasing Inequality, Deepening Segregation and Failing the Middle Class – and What we Can Do about it. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  10. Gibbons, Michael, Limoges Camille, Nowotny Helga, Simon Schwartzman, Peter Scott, and Martin Trow. 1994. The New Production of Knowledge: The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  11. Harvey, David. 2005. A Brief History of Neoliberalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Held, David. 2010. Cosmopolitanism: Ideals and Realities. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  13. Kuhn, Thomas. 2012 (originally published 1962). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Lewis, Paul, Caelanin Barr, Sean Clarke, Antonio Voce, Cath Lovett, and Pablo Gutierrez. 2019. Revealed: The Rise of Populist Rhetoric. The Guardian, March 6. Accessed 20 Apr 2019.
  15. Losh, Elizabeth, ed. 2017. MOOCs and their Alternatives. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  16. Moore, Peter. 2016. How Britain Voted at the EU Referendum. YouGov, June 27. Accessed 13 Mar 2019.
  17. Nowotny, Helga, Peter Scott, and Michael Gibbons. 2001. Rethinking Science: Knowledge and the Public in an Age of Uncertainty. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  18. Picketty, Thomas. 2017. Capital in the Twenty-First Century. Trans. Arthur Goldhammer. Harvard: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Popper, Karl. 1992. The Logic of Scientific Discovery. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  20. Razin, Assaf, and Efraim Sadka. 2005. The Decline of the Welfare State. Cambridge: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Reich, Robert. 1992. The Work of Nations: Preparing Ourselves for 21st Century Capitalism. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
  22. Scott, Peter. 2016. New Languages and Landscapes. In New Languages and Landscapes of Higher Education, ed. Peter Scott, Gallacher Jim, and Parry Gareth, 7–64. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. ———. 2018. The Implications of Brexit for Higher Education. In the UK and the Rest of Europe. Journal of the European Higher Education Area, 2018 (1). Berlin: DUZ.Google Scholar
  24. Simpson, Colin, and Marin Marinov. 2016. University Autonomy in the Age of Marketization. In (Re)Discovering University Autonomy: The Global Market Paradox of Stakeholder and Educational Values in Higher Education, ed. Romeo V. Turcan, John E. Reilly, and Larissa Bugaian, 73–86. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. UUP Foundation. 2019. Truly Civic: Strengthening the Connections Between Universities and their Places. London. Accessed 20 Mar 2019.

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University College LondonLondonUK

Personalised recommendations