Advertisement

Polymer Brush Based Tribology

  • Manjesh K. SinghEmail author
Chapter
  • 229 Downloads
Part of the Materials Forming, Machining and Tribology book series (MFMT)

Abstract

Polymer chains with one of their ends grafted on a surface, stretch out in a good solvent to take a brush-like formation when the grafting density, \(\rho_{g} > 1/\left( {\pi R_{g}^{2} } \right)\), where Rg is the radius of gyration of a chain in a good solvent. The equilibrium height of such a polymer brush is larger than the unperturbed size (Rg) of the corresponding polymer chain in a bulk solution. Polymer brushes find applications in the fields of tribology, rheology, biology and colloid-stabilization. Polymer brush based tribology is a recent attempt to mimic glycoproteins based lubrication found in nature. Higher coefficients of friction are observed due to as perity contact when hard surfaces are brought in contact and sheared against each-other. In contrast, when polymer-brush bearing surfaces are brought in contact with each-other and sheared in the presence of a good-solvent, much lower coefficients of friction are observed. Due to entropic reasons opposing polymer brushes avoid inter-digitation even under high compression enabling development of a thin fluid film between the brushes. Such a formation helps polymer brushes to support relatively high applied normal load while the thin fluid film in-between helps in reducing the friction. Tribological behavior of polymer brushes can be tuned by changing the grafting-density (ρg), chain-length (Lc), chain-stiffness (Kb), solvent-quality and cross-linking of chains. Possibility of designing lubricant with specific tribological properties make polymer-brushes an interesting topic of research. In this chapter we will go through the effects of different polymer-brush architectures on the tribological behavior of polymer brushes.

Keywords

Polymer-brush Biomimicry Gels Boundary-lubrication Aqueous-lubrication Lubricant-design-rule 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The author thanks the American Chemical Society publications, USA and Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute, Switzerland for granting permission to reprint the graphs and images. The author also thanks Dr. Tapan Chandra Adhyapak (IISER Tirupati) and Dr. Arghya Dutta (MPIP Mainz) for critically reading the manuscript.

References

  1. 1.
    N.D. Spencer, Tailoring Surfaces: Modifying Surface Composition and Structure for Applications in Tribology, Biology and Catalysis, vol. 5 (World Scientific, 2011)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    M.K. Singh, Simulation and Experimental Studies of Polymer-Brushes under Shear. Ph.D. thesis (ETH Zurich, 2016)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    A. Galuschko, L. Spirin, T. Kreer, A. Johner, C. Pastorino, J. Wittmer, J. Baschnagel, Frictional forces between strongly compressed, nonentangled polymer brushes: molecular dynamics simulations and scaling theory. Langmuir 26(9), 6418–6429 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    P.C. Nalam, S.N. Ramakrishna, R.M. Espinosa-Marzal, N.D. Spencer, Exploring lubrication regimes at the nanoscale: nanotribological characterization of silica and polymer brushes in viscous solvents. Langmuir 29(32), 10149–10158 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    M.K. Singh, P. Ilg, R.M. Espinosa-Marzal, M. Kröger, N.D. Spencer, Polymer brushes under shear: molecular dynamics simulations compared to experiments. Langmuir 31(16), 4798–4805 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    M.K. Singh, P. Ilg, R.M. Espinosa-Marzal, N.D. Spencer, M. Kröger, Influence of chain stiffness, grafting density and normal load on the tribological and structural behavior of polymer brushes: a nonequilibrium-molecular-dynamics study. Polymers 8(7), 254 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    J. Klein, D. Perahia, S. Warburg, Forces between polymer-bearing surfaces undergoing shear. Nature 352(6331), 143 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    J. Klein, E. Kumacheva, D. Mahalu, D. Perahia, L.J. Fetters, Reduction of frictional forces between solid surfaces bearing polymer brushes. Nature 370(6491), 634 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    J. Klein, Shear, friction, and lubrication forces between polymer-bearing surfaces. Annu. Rev. Mater. Sci. 26(1), 581–612 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    S. Lee, N.D. Spencer, Sweet, hairy, soft, and slippery. Science 319(5863), 575 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    S. Lee, M. Müller, M. Ratoi-Salagean, J. Vörös, S. Pasche, S.M. De Paul, H.A. Spikes, M. Textor, N.D. Spencer, Boundary lubrication of oxide surfaces by poly (l-lysine)-g-poly (ethylene glycol)(pll-g-peg) in aqueous media. Tribol. Lett. 15(3), 231–239 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    M. Müller, S. Lee, H.A. Spikes, N.D. Spencer, The influence of molecular architecture on the macroscopic lubrication properties of the brush-like co-polyelectrolyte poly (l-lysine)-g-poly (ethylene glycol)(pll-g-peg) adsorbed on oxide surfaces. Tribol. Lett. 15(4), 395–405 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    V.P. Bavaresco, C.A.C. Zavaglia, M.C. Reis, J.R. Gomes, Study on the tribological properties of phema hydrogels for use in artificial articular cartilage. Wear 265(3–4), 269–277 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    A. Nomura, K. Okayasu, K. Ohno, T. Fukuda, Y. Tsujii, Lubrication mechanism of concentrated polymer brushes in solvents: effect of solvent quality and thereby swelling state. Macromolecules 44(12), 5013–5019 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    P.-G. de Gennes, Conformations of polymers attached to an interface. Macromolecules 13(5), 1069–1075 (1980)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    S.T. Milner, T.A. Witten, M.E. Cates, Theory of the grafted polymer brush. Macromolecules 21(8), 2610–2619 (1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Y.B. Zhulina, V.A. Pryamitsyn, O.V. Borisov, Structure and conformational transitions in grafted polymer chain layers. A new theory. Polym. Sci. USSR 31(1), 205–216 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    G.S. Grest, Computer simulations of shear and friction between polymer brushes. Curr. Opin. Colloid Interface Sci. 2(3), 271–277 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    R.S. Hoy, G.S. Grest, Entanglements of an endgrafted polymer brush in a polymeric matrix. Macromolecules 40(23), 8389–8395 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    G.S. Grest, Interfacial sliding of polymer brushes: a molecular dynamics simulation. Phys. Rev. Lett. 76(26), 4979 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    M. Murat, G.S. Grest, Molecular dynamics simulations of the force between a polymer brush and an afm tip. Macromolecules 29(25), 8282–8284 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    J.N. Israelachvili, Intermolecular and Surface Forces (Academic press, Cambridge, 2011)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    P.C. Nalam, Polymer Brushes in Aqueous Solvent Mixtures: Impact of Polymer Conformation on Tribological Properties. Ph.D. thesis (ETH Zurich, 2012)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    A. Li, E.M. Benetti, D. Tranchida, J.N. Clasohm, H. Schönherr, N.D. Spencer, Surface-grafted, covalently cross-linked hydrogel brushes with tunable interfacial and bulk properties. Macromolecules 44(13), 5344–5351 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    M.K. Singh, C. Kang, P. Ilg, R. Crockett, M. Kröger, N.D. Spencer, Combined experimental and simulation studies of cross-linked polymer brushes under shear. Macromolecules 51(24), 10174–10183 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    K.J. Rosenberg, T. Goren, R. Crockett, N.D. Spencer, Load-induced transitions in the lubricity of adsorbed poly (l-lysine)-g-dextran as a function of polysaccharide chain density. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 3(8), 3020–3025 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    E. Mayoral, J. Klapp, A. Gama Goicochea, Scaling features of the tribology of polymer brushes of increasing grafting density around the mushroom-to-brush transition. Phys. Rev. E 95(1), 012505 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    P.J. Flory, Principles of Polymer Chemistry (Cornell University Press, Ithaca, 1953)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    M.L. Huggins, Some properties of solutions of long-chain compounds. J. Phys. Chem. 46(1), 151–158 (1942)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    P.-G. de Gennes, Scaling Concepts in Polymer Physics (Cornell University Press, Ithaca, 1979)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    M. Rubinstein, R.H. Colby, Polymer Physics, vol. 23 (Oxford University Press, New York, 2003)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    R.M. Espinosa-Marzal, P.C. Nalam, S. Bolisetty, N.D. Spencer, Impact of solvation on equilibrium conformation of polymer brushes in solvent mixtures. Soft Matter 9(15), 4045–4057 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    D. Mukherji, K. Kremer, Coil–globule–coil transition of pnipam in aqueous methanol: Coupling all-atom simulations to semi-grand canonical coarse-grained reservoir. Macromolecules 46(22), 9158–9163 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    D. Mukherji, C.M. Marques, T. Stuehn, K. Kremer, Depleted depletion drives polymer swelling in poor solvent mixtures. Nat. Commun. 8(1), 1374 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    D. Mukherji, C.M. Marques, K. Kremer, Collapse in two good solvents, swelling in two poor solvents: defying the laws of polymer solubility? J. Phys. Condens. Matter 30(2), 024002 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    D. Mukherji, C.M. Marques, K. Kremer, Polymer collapse in miscible good solvents is a generic phenomenon driven by preferential adsorption. Nat. Commun. 5, 4882 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    H. Yong, S. Rauch, K.-J. Eichhorn, P. Uhlmann, A. Fery, J.-U. Sommer, Cononsolvency transition of polymer brushes: a combined experimental and theoretical study. Materials 11(6), 991 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    J.-U. Sommer, Adsorption-attraction model for co-nonsolvency in polymer brushes. Macromolecules 50(5), 2219–2228 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Y. Yu, B.D. Kieviet, E. Kutnyanszky, G.J. Vancso, S. de Beer, Cosolvency-induced switching of the adhesion between poly (methyl methacrylate) brushes. ACS Macro Lett. 4(1), 75–79 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Y. Yu, M. Cirelli, B.D. Kieviet, E.S. Kooij, G.J. Vancso, S. de Beer, Tunable friction by employment of co-non-solvency of pnipam brushes. Polymer 102, 372–378 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    J. Gong, M. Higa, Y. Iwasaki, Y. Katsuyama, Y. Osada, Friction of gels. J. Phys. Chem. B 101(28), 5487–5489 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    M.K. Singh, P. Ilg, R.M. Espinosa-Marzal, M. Kröger, N.D. Spencer, Effect of crosslinking on the microtribological behavior of model polymer brushes. Tribol. Lett. 63(2), 17 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Motoyasu Kobayashi, Masami Terada, Atsushi Takahara, Polyelectrolyte brushes: a novel stable lubrication system in aqueous conditions. Faraday Discuss. 156(1), 403–412 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Q. Zhang, L.A. Archer, Interfacial friction and adhesion of cross-linked polymer thin films swollen with linear chains. Langmuir 23(14), 7562–7570 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    C.E. McNamee, S. Yamamoto, K. Higashitani, Preparation and characterization of pure and mixed monolayers of poly (ethylene glycol) brushes chemically adsorbed to silica surfaces. Langmuir 23(8), 4389–4399 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    K. Kitano, Y. Inoue, R. Matsuno, M. Takai, K. Ishihara, Nanoscale evaluation of lubricity on welldefined polymer brush surfaces using qcm-d and afm. Colloids Surf., B 74(1), 350–357 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Z. Zhang, A.J. Morse, S.P. Armes, A.L. Lewis, M. Geoghegan, G.J. Leggett, Effect of brush thickness and solvent composition on the friction force response of poly (2-(methacryloyloxy) ethylphosphorylcholine) brushes. Langmuir 27(6), 2514–2521 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    S. Watson, S. Dennington, L. Wang, M. Nie, S. Hinder, K. Stokes, Polymer brush lubrication of the silicon nitride–steel contact: a colloidal force microscopy study. Rsc Adv. 7(68), 42667–42676 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    M. Belin, H. Arafune, T. Kamijo, J. PerretLiaudet, T. Morinaga, S. Honma, T. Sato, Low friction, lubricity, and durability of polymer brush coatings, characterized using the relaxation tribometer technique. Lubricants 6(2), 52 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    A. Li, S.N. Ramakrishna, P.C. Nalam, E.M. Benetti, N.D. Spencer, Stratified polymer grafts: synthesis and characterization of layered ‘brush’ and ‘gel’ structures. Adv. Mater. Interfaces 1(1), 1300007 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Indian Institute of TechnologyKanpurIndia

Personalised recommendations