Ge-Stell: The Essence of Technology

  • Johannes Achill Niederhauser


A first step toward a clearer understanding of why Heidegger chooses the word Ge-Stell to describe the essence of technology is via the word itself. The German word Gestell used to be a common word. A Gestell is a stand or supporting framework used, for example, in workshops or on farms. Until the second half of the twentieth century “Gstell” in Southern German dialects was also used to refer to machines like a circular saw. Yet, this is not what Heidegger means by Ge-Stell. By hyphenating the word Heidegger in a sense frees the word from its immediate everyday meanings. The interruption of the hyphen lets us rest on the prefix and simultaneously brings to the fore the weight and meaning of the root verb stellen: Ge-Stell is then the gathering of all modes of stellen, of placing, putting, positioning, setting (up), producing, chasing, imitating. Note also that the perfect tense of stellen is gestellt. As an adjective gestellt can also mean affected and artificial. The notion of Ge-Stell is inspired by Eckhart’s Gestellnis, a translation of the Roman forma and the Greek μορφή. We always produce things according to preconceived forms, as Sheehan notes (cf. Sheehan 2010: 95). But Ge-Stell operates by homogenising and making uniform and in this way Ge-Stell eradicates ownness.


  1. Dahlstrom, Daniel. 2011. Being at the Beginning: Heidegger’s Interpretation of Heraclitus. In Interpreting Heidegger: Critical Essays, ed. D. Dahlstrom, 135–155. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Hahn, Charles H. 1987. The Art and Thought of Heraclitus: An Edition of the Fragments with Translation and Commentary. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Houlgate, Stephen. 2009. An Introduction to Hegel: Freedom, Truth and History. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
  4. Marx, Werner. 1983. Is There a Measure on Earth? Foundations for a Nonmetaphysical Ethics. Trans. T.J. Nenon and R. Lilly. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  5. Mitchell, Andrew. 2015. Fourfold: Reading the Late Heidegger. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Robson, David. 2017. The Birth of Half-human, Half-animal Chimeras. BBC. (accessed 2nd April 2018).
  7. Sheehan, Thomas. 2010. The Turn. In Martin Heidegger: Key Concepts, ed. Bret Davis, 82–97. Durham: Acumen Publishing.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2021

Authors and Affiliations

  • Johannes Achill Niederhauser
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Philosophy, Birkbeck CollegeUniversity of LondonLondonUK

Personalised recommendations