Language and Death in the Fourfold

  • Johannes Achill Niederhauser


The key passage speaks of the essential relation between language and death. As I have tried to show in this part so far, this does not mean that this relation is at stake only in the key passage. Nevertheless, I now turn to an in-depth interpretation of the passage in question and read it against the background of the tension between the fourfold and positionality. I first explicate the key passage and combine this with my findings so far. This will allow me to elaborate on the role death plays in the constitution of the world as fourfold.


  1. Agamben, Giorgio. 2006. Language and Death: The Place of Negativity. Trans. K.E. Pinkus and M.Hardt. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  2. Calarco, Matthew. 2008. Zoographies: The Question of the Animal from Heidegger to Derrida. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  3. De Gennaro, Ivo. 2001. Logos: Heidegger liest Heraklit. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot.Google Scholar
  4. Hahn, Charles H. 1987. The Art and Thought of Heraclitus: An Edition of the Fragments with Translation and Commentary. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Nietzsche, Friedrich. 2003. The Gay Science. Trans. J. Nauckhoff, ed. B. Williams. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Wild, Markus. 2013. Tierphilosophie bei Heidegger, Agamben, Derrida. Journal Phänomenologie 40: 23–35.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2021

Authors and Affiliations

  • Johannes Achill Niederhauser
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Philosophy, Birkbeck CollegeUniversity of LondonLondonUK

Personalised recommendations