Advertisement

Digital Impression Systems, CAD/CAM, and STL file

  • Bálint Vecsei
  • Alexandra Czigola
  • Ivett Róth
  • Peter Hermann
  • Judit Borbély
Chapter
  • 2 Downloads

Abstract

Digital impression systems are integral part of modern dental practice for the complete digital workflow. Digital intraoral scan containing the digital information of the oral cavity’s geometry generates a standard tessellation language (STL) file format, which is also essential during guided endodontics procedures. Direct and indirect methods can generate the STL file during classic computer-aided design (CAD)/computer-aided manufacturing (CAM) workflow. This chapter will discuss the fundamentals of digital impression systems and digital workflow, and describe a few available systems. These can generate the required STL file, which can be aligned on cone-beam computer tomography (CBCT) scans to design the guiding sleeve’s position during a guided endodontic procedure. The guided, virtually planned, minimally invasive access cavity ensures a quick and successful root canal access with the smallest possible loss of tooth structure.

Keywords

CAD/CAM STL Digital impression 

References

  1. 1.
    Bohner L, et al. Accuracy of digital technologies for the scanning of facial, skeletal, and intraoral tissues: a systematic review. J Prosthet Dent. 2019;121(2):246–51.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Vecsei B, et al. Comparison of the accuracy of direct and indirect three-dimensional digitizing processes for CAD/CAM systems - an in vitro study. J Prosthod Res. 2017;61(2):177–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kim RJ, Park JM, Shim JS. Accuracy of 9 intraoral scanners for complete-arch image acquisition: a qualitative and quantitative evaluation. J Prosthet Dent. 2018;120(6):895–903.e1.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ender A, Zimmermann M, Mehl A. Accuracy of complete- and partial-arch impressions of actual intraoral scanning systems in vitro. Int J Comput Dent. 2019;22(1):11–9.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Gonzalez de Villaumbrosia P, et al. In vitro comparison of the accuracy (trueness and precision) of six extraoral dental scanners with different scanning technologies. J Prosthet Dent. 2016;116(4):543–550.e1.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Jang Y, et al. Evaluation of the marginal and internal fit of a single crown fabricated based on a three-dimensional printed model. J Adv Prosthod. 2018;10(5):367–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gaudin A, Pérez F, Galicia J. Digital technology in endodontics. In: Tamimi F, Hirayama H, editors. Digital restorative dentistry: a guide to materials, equipment, and clinical procedures. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2019. p. 229–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Connert T, et al. Guided endodontics versus conventional access cavity preparation: a comparative study on substance loss using 3-dimensional-printed teeth. J Endod. 2019;45(3):327–31.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    van der Meer WJ, et al. 3D Computer aided treatment planning in endodontics. J Dent. 2016;45:67–72.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    International Organization for Standardization. Dentistry—digitizing devices for CAD/CAM systems for indirect dental restorations - test methods for assessing accuracy. Geneva: International Organization for Standardization; 2012.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Birnbaum NS, Aaronson HB. Dental impressions using 3D digital scanners: virtual becomes reality. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2008;29(8):494–6, 498–505.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Davidowitz G, Kotick PG. The use of CAD/CAM in dentistry. Dent Clin N Am. 2011;55(3):559–70, ix.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Péter H, Péter K, András K. Fogpótlástani anyagtan és odontotechnológia. Budapest: Semmelweis Kiadó; 2015.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    McLaren EA, Culp L, White S. The evolution of digital dentistry and the digital dental team. Dent Today. 2008;27(9):112–4, 116–7.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Miyazaki T, et al. A review of dental CAD/CAM: current status and future perspectives from 20 years of experience. Dent Mater J. 2009;28(1):44–56.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Mormann WH. The evolution of the CEREC system. J Am Dent Assoc. 2006;137(Suppl):7S–13S.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Logozzo S, et al. Recent advances in dental optics – Part I: 3D intraoral scanners for restorative dentistry. Opt Lasers Eng. 2014;54:203–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Research R. ATLAS DENTAL European Markets///structures, challenges and scenarios. Köln: GFDI; 2019.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ferencz JL. Today’s CAD/CAM: flexible digital technologies expanding workflow options. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2015;36(3):222–3.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Christensen GJ. Impressions are changing: deciding on conventional, digital or digital plus in-office milling. J Am Dent Assoc. 2009;140(10):1301–4.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Nedelcu R, et al. Finish line distinctness and accuracy in 7 intraoral scanners versus conventional impression: an in vitro descriptive comparison. BMC Oral Health. 2018;18(1):27.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Lee JJ, et al. Accuracy of single-abutment digital cast obtained using intraoral and cast scanners. J Prosthet Dent. 2017;117(2):253–9.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Richert R, et al. Intraoral scanner technologies: a review to make a successful impression. J Healthc Eng. 2017;2017:8427595.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Freedman M, Quinn F, O’Sullivan M. Single unit CAD/CAM restorations: a literature review. J Ir Dent Assoc. 2007;53(1):38–45.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Luthardt R, et al. Design and production of dental prosthetic restorations: basic research on dental CAD/CAM technology. Int J Comput Dent. 2002;5(2–3):165.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Beuer F, Schweiger J, Edelhoff D. Digital dentistry: an overview of recent developments for CAD/CAM generated restorations. Br Dent J. 2008;204(9):505–11.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Fasbinder DJ. Computerized technology for restorative dentistry. Am J Dent. 2013;26(3):115–20.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Vlaar ST, van der Zel JM. Accuracy of dental digitizers. Int Dent J. 2006;56(5):301–9.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Ramiro GP, et al. Digitalization in restorative dentistry. In: Tamimi F, Hirayama H, editors. Digital restorative dentistry: a guide to materials, equipment, and clinical procedures. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2019. p. 7–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Kusnoto B, Evans CA. Reliability of a 3D surface laser scanner for orthodontic applications. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2002;122(4):342–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Fasbinder DJ. Digital dentistry: innovation for restorative treatment. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2010;31(4):2–11, quiz 12.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Ting-shu S, Jian S. Intraoral digital impression technique: a review. J Prosthod. 2015;24(4):313–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Zimmermann M, et al. Intraoral scanning systems - a current overview. Int J Comput Dent. 2015;18(2):101–29.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Martin CB, et al. Orthodontic scanners: what’s available? J Orthod. 2015;42(2):136–43.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Flugge TV, et al. Precision of intraoral digital dental impressions with iTero and extraoral digitization with the iTero and a model scanner. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2013;144(3):471–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Ender A, Mehl A. Influence of scanning strategies on the accuracy of digital intraoral scanning systems. Int J Comput Dent. 2013;16(1):11–21.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Kattadiyil MT, et al. Intraoral scanning of hard and soft tissues for partial removable dental prosthesis fabrication. J Prosthet Dent. 2014;112(3):444–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Imburgia M, et al. Accuracy of four intraoral scanners in oral implantology: a comparative in vitro study. BMC Oral Health. 2017;17(1):92.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Aragon ML, et al. Validity and reliability of intraoral scanners compared to conventional gypsum models measurements: a systematic review. Eur J Orthod. 2016;38(4):429–34.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Mangano F, et al. Intraoral scanners in dentistry: a review of the current literature. BMC Oral Health. 2017;17(1):149.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Mormann WH, et al. Chairside computer-aided direct ceramic inlays. Quintessence Int. 1989;20(5):329–39.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Puri S. Evolutions in CAD/CAM hardware, software, and materials. Dent Today. 2011;30(5):116–8, 120–1.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Ramiro GP, et al. Computer-aided design in restorative dentistry. In: Tamimi F, Hirayama H, editors. Digital restorative dentistry: a guide to materials, equipment, and clinical procedures. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2019. p. 41–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Coachman C, Calamita M. Digital smile design: a tool for treatment planning and communication in esthetic dentistry. QDT 2012 Quintes. 2012;35:1–9.Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Kurbad A, Kurbad S. Cerec Smile Design--a software tool for the enhancement of restorations in the esthetic zone. Int J Comput Dent. 2013;16(3):255–69.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Zimmermann M, Mehl A. Virtual smile design systems: a current review. Int J Comput Dent. 2015;18(4):303–17.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Masri R. Clinical applications of digital dental technology. Ames, IA: Wiley-Blackwell; 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Prajapati A, et al. Dentistry goes digital: a Cad-Cam way - a review article. J Dent Med Sci. 2014;13(8):53–9.Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Grant GT. Direct digital manufacturing; 2015. p. 41–56.Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    McLaren EA, Terry DA. CAD/CAM systems, materials, and clinical guidelines for all-ceramic crowns and fixed partial dentures. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2002;23(7):637–41.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Reich S, et al. Clinical fit of all-ceramic three-unit fixed partial dentures, generated with three different CAD/CAM systems. Eur J Oral Sci. 2005;113(2):174–9.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Bindl A, Mormann WH. Marginal and internal fit of all-ceramic CAD/CAM crown-copings on chamfer preparations. J Oral Rehabil. 2005;32(6):441–7.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Stappert CF, et al. Marginal adaptation of different types of all-ceramic partial coverage restorations after exposure to an artificial mouth. Br Dent J. 2005;199(12):779–83, discussion 777.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Tinschert J, et al. Marginal fit of alumina-and zirconia-based fixed partial dentures produced by a CAD/CAM system. Oper Dent. 2001;26(4):367–74.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Fasbinder DJ, et al. A clinical evaluation of chairside lithium disilicate CAD/CAM crowns: a two-year report. J Am Dent Assoc. 2010;141(Suppl 2):10s–4s.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Alageel O, et al. Fabrication of dental restorations using digital technologies: techniques and materials. In: Tamimi F, Hirayama H, editors. Digital restorative dentistry: a guide to materials, equipment, and clinical procedures. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2019. p. 55–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Fasbinder DJ. Chairside CAD/CAM: an overview of restorative material options. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2012;33(1):50, 52–8.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Fasbinder DJ, Neiva GF. Surface evaluation of polishing techniques for new resilient CAD/CAM restorative materials. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2016;28(1):56–66.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Sailer I, et al. Five-year clinical results of zirconia frameworks for posterior fixed partial dentures. Int J Prosthodont. 2007;20(4):383–8.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Vult von Steyern P, Carlson P, Nilner K. All-ceramic fixed partial dentures designed according to the DC-Zirkon technique. A 2-year clinical study. J Oral Rehabil. 2005;32(3):180–7.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Jang GW, et al. Fracture strength and mechanism of dental ceramic crown with zirconia thickness. Proc Eng. 2011;10:1556–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Ozkurt-Kayahan Z. Monolithic zirconia: a review of the literature. Biomed Res. 2016;27(4):1427–36.Google Scholar
  63. 63.
    Mehl A, et al. In vivo tooth-color measurement with a new 3D intraoral scanning system in comparison to conventional digital and visual color determination methods. Int J Comput Dent. 2017;20(4):343–61.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Yilmaz B, Irmak O, Yaman BC. Outcomes of visual tooth shade selection performed by operators with different experience. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2019;31:500.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Liberato WF, et al. A comparison between visual, intraoral scanner, and spectrophotometer shade matching: a clinical study. J Prosthet Dent. 2019;121(2):271–5.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Global medical device company launches new iTero element 5D imaging system. Br Dent J. 2019;226(5):379.Google Scholar
  67. 67.
    Prudente MS, et al. Influence of scanner, powder application, and adjustments on CAD-CAM crown misfit. J Prosthet Dent. 2018;119(3):377–83.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Santos GC Jr, et al. Overview of CEREC CAD/CAM chairside system. Gen Dent. 2013;61(1):36–40, quiz 41.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Skramstad MJ. Welcome to Cerec Primescan AC. Int J Comput Dent. 2019;22(1):69–78.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2021

Authors and Affiliations

  • Bálint Vecsei
    • 1
  • Alexandra Czigola
    • 1
  • Ivett Róth
    • 1
  • Peter Hermann
    • 1
  • Judit Borbély
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of ProsthodonticsSemmelweis UniversityBudapestHungary

Personalised recommendations