Advertisement

Comparison of Muscular Activity Analysis for Electrical Technicians in High Voltage Lines Using Exoskeleton in the Colombian Industry, Enel-Codensa Study Case

  • Sebastián PeláezEmail author
  • Christian Zea
  • Iván Mondragón
  • Rodolfo García
  • Giovanni Hernández
Conference paper
  • 291 Downloads
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 1253)

Abstract

The aim of this case study was to analyze and evaluate the force risks associated with building metal towers structures using exoskeleton and without it in electrical technicians in high voltage lines. The data recollection was made using three different methods, a self-discomfort report, observational data (RULA and REBA) and muscular activity using electromyography (EMG). The results of the self-discomfort report showed a greater discomfort in wrist, hands, lower back and thighs. The outcomes of RULA analysis suggested that 51,6% of the activity postures were in high risk and the remaining in medium risk. REBA’s outcomes showed that 32% of the activity postures are classified as high risk and 65% in medium risk. About the EMG analysis, the mean difference analysis showed that there is no difference between using the exoskeleton and without. Finally, it is necessary to improve the working conditions instead of considering the usage of the exoskeleton.

Keywords

Electromyography Task analysis Electric industry 

References

  1. 1.
    Quintero, J.E.G.: Factores De Riesgos Ergonómicos Presentes En Los Trabajadores De Lineas Y Redes De La Empresa Electrificadora Del Huila S.A (2009)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Padmanathan, V., Joseph, L., Omar, B., Nawawi, R.: Prevalence of musculoskeletal disorders and related occupational causative factors among electricity linemen: a narrative review. Int. J. Occup. Med. Environ. Health 29, 725–734 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
  4. 4.
    De Looze, M.P., Bosch, T., Krause, F., Stadler, K.S., O’Sullivan, L.W.: Exoskeletons for industrial application and their potential effects on physical work load. Ergonomics 59, 671–681 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bosch, T., van Eck, J., Knitel, K., de Looze, M.: The effects of a passive exoskeleton on muscle activity, discomfort and endurance time in forward bending work. Appl. Ergon. 54, 212–217 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Perotto, A.: Anatomical Guide for the Electromyographer: The Limbs and Trunk (2011)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Freriks, B., Hemens, H., Disselhorst-Klug, C., Rau, G.: The recommendations for sensors and sensor placement procedures for surface electromyography. Eur. Recommendations Surf. Electromyogr. 15–53 (1999)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Jonsson, B.: The static load component in muscle work. Eur. J. Appl. Physiol. Occup. Physiol. 57(3), 305–310 (1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2021

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sebastián Peláez
    • 1
    Email author
  • Christian Zea
    • 1
  • Iván Mondragón
    • 1
  • Rodolfo García
    • 2
  • Giovanni Hernández
    • 2
  1. 1.Pontificia Universidad JaverianaBogotáColombia
  2. 2.Enel-CodensaBogotáColombia

Personalised recommendations