Numerical and Experimental Study on Combustion Performance of an Infrared Radiation Burner with Porous Metal Plaque

  • Yunfei Jia
  • Weiguo ZhouEmail author
  • Junying Tang
  • Yang Luo
Conference paper
Part of the Environmental Science and Engineering book series (ESE)


Compared with atmospheric burner, porous infrared radiation burner has higher thermal efficiency. In this study, an infrared radiation burner with metal plaque was studied experimentally and numerically. The experimental results show that the thermal efficiency is 60.6% without blow-off, flashback, or lifted-flame during the continuous combustion for 60 min. The simulation with suitable kinetic parameters of chemical reaction agrees well with the experimental results. Moreover, a parametric study concerned with the plaque porosity, bore diameter, and thermal load was conducted by the validated model. The results show that the flame temperature increases when the bore diameter or the thermal load increases but decreases with the enlarged porosity. The upper surface temperature increases linearly with the improved thermal load but decreases when the porosity increases, and the bore diameter has a negligible effect on it. The nitrogen oxide (NOx) emission is positively correlated to the combustion temperature.


Porous metal plaque Combustion performance NOx emission Methane single-step reaction 


  1. 1.
    Duan, C.: The study on the honeycomb-brick surface combustion burner as domestic range. J. Harbin Architectural Civ. Eng. Inst. 3, 125–128 (1993)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Howell, J.R., et al.: Combustion of hydrocarbon fuels within porous inert media. Prog. Energy Combust. Sci. 22(2), 121–145 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Zhdanok, S.A., et al.: Superadiabatic combustion of methane air mixtures under filtration in a packed bed. Combust. Flame 100(1), 221–231 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Weinberg, F.J.: Combustion temperatures: the future. Nature 233(5317), 239–241 (1971)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Mathis, W.M., Ellzey, J.L.: Flame stabilization, operating range, and emissions for a methane/air porous burner. Combust. Sci. Technol. 175(5), 825–839 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hsu, P.F., Matthews, R.D.: The necessity of using detailed kinetics in models for premixed combustion within porous media. Combust. Flame 93(4), 457–466 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Zhong, F.: Simulation of Natural Gas Premixed Combustion in Ported Ceramic Plaque Radiator. Master dissertation, Harbin Institute of Technology (2006)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Westbrook, C.K., Dryer, F.L.: Simplified reaction mechanisms for the oxidation of hydrocarbon fuels in flames. Combust. Sci. Technol. 27(1–2), 31–43 (1981)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Wu, C., et al.: Experimental study of porous metal burners for domestic stove applications. Energy Convers. Manag. 77, 380–388 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Yang, S., Tao, W.: Heat Transfer, 4th edn. Higher Education Press, Beijing, China (2006)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Zhao, D., et al.: Optimization of a premixed cylindrical burner for low pollutant emission. Energy Convers. Manag. 99, 151–160 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.College of Mechanical EngineeringTongji UniversityShanghaiChina

Personalised recommendations