Advertisement

Protozoa: Testate Amoebae

  • Louis Beyens
  • Ralf Meisterfeld
Chapter
Part of the Developments in Paleoenvironmental Research book series (DPER, volume 3)

Keywords

protozoa protists rhizopods testate amoebae preparation methods paleolimnology pH water table eutrophication catchment processes climatic change surface moisture sea level changes 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Asioli, A., F. Medioli & R. T. Patterson, 1996. Thecamoebians as a tool for reconstruction of paleoen-vironments in some Italian lakes in the foothills of the southern Alps (Orta, Varese and Candia). J. Foramin. Res. 26: 248–263.Google Scholar
  2. Beyens, L., 1984a. A concise survey of testate amoebae analysis. Bulletin de la Société beige de Géologie 93: 261–266.Google Scholar
  3. Beyens, L., 1984b. Paleoecologische en paleoklimatologische aspecten van de holocene ontwikkeling van de Antwerpse Noorderkempen. (Palaeoecological and palaeoclimatological aspects of the Holocene evolution of the Antwerpse Noorderkempen). Academiae Analecta, Mededelingen-Wetenschappen 46: 15–56.Google Scholar
  4. Beyens, L., 1985. On the subboreal climate of the Belgian Campine as deduced from diatom and testate amoebae analyses. Rev. Palaeobot. Palynol. 46: 9–31.Google Scholar
  5. Beyens, L. & D. Chardez with collaboration of P. De Bock, 1986. Some new and rare testate amoebae from the Arctic. Acta Protozoologica 25: 81–89.Google Scholar
  6. Beyens, L. & D. Chardez, 1987. Evidence from testate amoebae for changes in some local hydrological conditions between c. 5000 BP and c. 3800 BP on Edgeøya (Svalbard). Polar Res. 5 n.s.: 165–169.Google Scholar
  7. Beyens, L. & D. Chardez, 1995. An annotated list of testate amoebae observed in the Arctic between the longitudes 27° E and 168° W. Arch. Protistenkd. 146: 219–233.Google Scholar
  8. Beyens, L. & D. Chardez, 1997. New testate amoebae taxa from the polar regions. Acta Protozoologica 36: 137–142.Google Scholar
  9. Beyens, L., D. Chardez & R. De Landtsheer with collaboration of D. De Baere, 1986. Testate amoebae communities from aquatic habitats in the Arctic. Polar Biol. 6: 197–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Beyens, L., D. Chardez & D. De Baere, 1991. Ecology of aquatic testate amoebae in coastal lowlands of Devon Island (Canadian High Arctic). Arch. Protistenkd. 140: 23–33.Google Scholar
  11. Beyens, L., D. Chardez, D. De Baere & C. Verbruggen, 1995. The aquatic testate amoebae fauna of the Strømness Bay area, South Georgia. Antarctic Science 7: 3–8.Google Scholar
  12. Bhattacharya, D., T. Helmchen & M. Melkonian, 1995. Molecular evolutionary analyses of nuclear-encoded small subunit ribosomal RNA identify an independent rhizopod Lineage containing the Euglyphina and the Chlorarachniophyta. J. Euk. Microbiol. 42: 65–69.Google Scholar
  13. Birks, H. J. & H. H. Birks, 1980. Quaternary Palaeoecology. Edward Arnold, London, 289 pp.Google Scholar
  14. Birks, H. J., 1986. Numerical zonation comparison and correlation of Quartenary pollen-stratigraphical data. In Berglund (ed.) Handbook of Holocene Palaeoecology and Palaeohydrology. J. Wiley & Sons, Chichester: 743–774.Google Scholar
  15. Bobrov, A., D. Charman & B. Warner, 1999. Ecology of testate amoebae (Protozoa: Rhizopoda) on peatlands in Western Russia with special attention to niche separation in closely related taxa. Protist. 150: 125–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Bonnet, L., 1961. Caractéres Génèraux des populations thécamoebienns endogées. Pedobiologia 1: 6–24.Google Scholar
  17. Bonnet, L., 1964. Le peuplement thécamoebien des sols. Rev. Ecol. Biol. sol 1: 123–408.Google Scholar
  18. Bonnet, L., 1975. Types morphologiques, écologie et évolution de la théque chez les thécamoebiens. Protistologica 11: 363–378.Google Scholar
  19. Bonnet, L. & R. Thomas, 1960. Faune terrestre et ďeau douce des Pyrénées-Orientales. Thécamoebiens du sol. Vie et Milieu 11 Suppl.: 1–103.Google Scholar
  20. Bovee, E. C., 1985. Class lobosea carpenter, 1861. In Lee, J. J. et al. (eds.) An Illustrated Guide to the Protozoa: 158–211. Society of Protozoologists, Lawrence, Kansas, 629 pp.Google Scholar
  21. Buttler, A., B. Warner, P. Grosvernier & Y. Matthey, 1996. Vertical patterns of testate amoebae (Protozoa: Rhizopoda) and peat-forming vegetation on cutover bogs in the Jura, Switzerland. New Phytol. 134: 371–382.Google Scholar
  22. Cash, J. & J. Hopkinson, 1905. The British Freshwater Rhizopoda and Heliozoa I. Ray Soc. London, 148 pp.Google Scholar
  23. Cash, J. & J. Hopkinson, 1909. The British Freshwater Rhizopoda and Heliozoa II. Ray Soc. London, 166 pp.Google Scholar
  24. Cash, J., G. H. Wailes & J. Hopkinson, 1915. The British Freshwater Rhizopoda and Heliozoa III. Ray Soc. London, 156 pp.Google Scholar
  25. Casper, S. J. & W. Schönborn, 1985. Difflugia limnetica (Levander) Penard (Protozoa: Testacea) as indicator organism of calcite precipitation in Lake Stechlin, GDR. Arch. Protistenkd. 130: 305–211.Google Scholar
  26. Cavalier-Smith, T., 1997. Amoeboflagellates and mitochondrial cristae in eukaryote evolution: Megasystematics of the new protozoan subkingdoms Eozoa and Neozoa. Arch. Protistenkd. 147: 237–258.Google Scholar
  27. Cavalier-Smith, T. & E. E. Chao, 1997. Sarcomonad ribosomal RNA sequences, rhizopod phylogeny, and the origin of euglyphid amoebae. Arch. Protistenkd. 147: 227–236.Google Scholar
  28. Chardez, D., 1964. Thécamoebiens (Rhizopodes Testacés). In Symoens, J. J. (ed.) Exploration Hydrobiol du Bassin du Lac Bangweolo et du Luapula 10, 2: 1–77.Google Scholar
  29. Chardez, D. & L. Beyens, 1988. Centropyxis gasparella sp.nov. and Parmulina louisi sp.nov., new testate amoebae from the Canadian High (Devon Island, N.W.T.). Arch. Protistenkd. 136: 337–344.Google Scholar
  30. Chardez, D. & R. Thomas, 1980. Thecamoebiens du Mesopsammon des plages de Lacanau et Leporge-Ocean (Gironde, France). Acta Protozoologica 19: 277–285.Google Scholar
  31. Charman, D. & B. Warner, 1992. Relationship between testate amoebae and micro-environmental parameters on a forested peatland in northeastern Ontario. Can. J. Zool. 70: 2474–2482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Charman, D. & B. Warner, 1997. The ecology of testate amoebae (Protozoa: Rhizopoda) in oceanic peatlands in Newfoundland, Canada: Modelling hydrological relationships for palaeoenvironmental reconstruction. Ecoscience 4: 555–562.Google Scholar
  33. Charman, D., H. Roe & W. R. Gehrels, 1998. The use of testate amoebae in studies of sea-level change: a case study from the Taf Estuary, south Wales, UK. The Holocene 8: 209–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Charman, D., D. Hendon & S. Packman, 1999. Multiproxy surface wetness records from replicate cores on an ombrotrophic mire: implications for Holocene palaeoclimate records. J. Quarter. Sci. 14: 451–463.Google Scholar
  35. Collins, E., F. McCarthy, F. Medioli, D. Scott & C. Honig, 1990. Biogeographic distribution of modern thecamoebians in a transect along the Eastern North American Coast. In Hemleben et al. (eds.) Paleoecology, Biostratigraphy, Paleoceanography and Taxonomy of Agglutinated Foraminifera. Kluwer Academic Publishers: 783–792.Google Scholar
  36. Corbet, S., 1973. An illustrated introduction to the testaterhizopods in Sphagnum with special reference to the area around Malham tarn, Yorkshire. Field Studies 3: 801–838.Google Scholar
  37. Costan, G. & D. Planas, 1986. Effects of a short-term experimental acidification on a microinvertebrate community. Rhizopoda, Testacea. Can. J. Zool. 64: 1224–1230.Google Scholar
  38. Coûteaux, M., 1992. Decomposition of cells and empty shells of testate amoebae in an organic acid soil sterilized by propylene oxide fumigation, autoclaving and y-ray irradiation. Biol. Fertil. Soils 12: 290–294.Google Scholar
  39. Decloitre, L., 1962. Le genre Euglypha DUJARDIN. Arch. Protistenkd. 106: 51–100.Google Scholar
  40. Decloitre, L., 1976a. Le genre Arcella EHRENBERG. Compléments à jour au 31. Décembre 1974 de la monographie du genre parue en 1928. Arch. Protistenkd. 118: 291–309.Google Scholar
  41. Decloitre, L., 1976b. Le genre Euglypha. Compléments à jour au 31. Décembre 1974 de la monographie du genre parue en 1962. Arch. Protistenkd. 118: 18–33.Google Scholar
  42. Decloitre, L., 1977a. Le genre Cyclopyxis. Compléments à jour au 31. Décembre 1974 de la monographie du genre parue en 1929. Arch. Protistenkd. 119: 31–53.Google Scholar
  43. Decloitre, L., 1977b. Le genre Nebela. Compléments à jour au 31. Décembre 1974 du genre parue en 1936. Arch. Protistenkd. 119: 325–352.Google Scholar
  44. Decloitre, L., 1978. Le genre Centropyxis I. Compléments à jour au 31.12.1974 de la monographie du genre parue en 1929. Arch. Protistenkd. 120: 63–85.Google Scholar
  45. Decloitre, L., 1979a. Le genre Centropyxis II. Compléments à jour au 31. Décembre 1974 de la monographie du genre parue en 1929. Arch. Protistenkd. 121: 162–192.Google Scholar
  46. Decloitre, L., 1979b. Mises à jour au 31.12.1978 des mises à jour au 31.12.1974 concernant les genres Arcella; Centropyxis; Cydopyxis; Euglypha et Nebela. Arch. Protistenkd. 122: 387–397.Google Scholar
  47. Decloitre, L., 1981. Le Genre Trinema DUJARDIN, 1941. Rèvision à jour au 31.XII.1979. Arch. Protistenkd. 124: 193–218.Google Scholar
  48. Decloitre, L., 1982. Compléments aux publications précédentes. Mise à jour au 31.XII. 1981 des genres Arcella, Centropyxis, Cyclopyxis, Euglypha, Nebela et Trinema. Arch. Protistenkd. 126: 393–407.Google Scholar
  49. Decloitre, L., 1986. Compléments aux publications précédentes. Mise à jour au 31. XII. 1984 des genres Arcella, Centropyxis, Cyclopyxis, Euglypha et Nebela. Arch. Protistenkd. 132: 131–136.Google Scholar
  50. Decloitre, L., 1986. Statistique mondial des Thécamoebiens. Ann. Soc. Sci. Nat. Archeol. Toulon et Var 37.Google Scholar
  51. Denys, L. & H. De Wolf, 1999. Diatoms as indicators of coastal paleoenvironments and relative sea-level change. In Stoermer, E. & J. Smol (eds.) The Diatoms. Applications for the Environment and Earth Sciences. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge: 277–297.Google Scholar
  52. Douglas, M. & J. Smol, 1987. Siliceous protozoan plates in lake sediments. Hydrobiologia 154: 13–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Ellison, R., 1995. Paleolimnological analysis of Ullswater using testate amoebae. J. Paleolimnol. 13: 51–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Ellison, R. L. & C. Ogden, 1987. A guide to the study of identification of fossil testate amoebae in Quaternary lake sediments. Int. Revue ges. Hydrobiol. 72: 639–652.Google Scholar
  55. Foissner, W., 1994. Progress in taxonomy of planktonic freshwater ciliates. Marine Microbial Food Webs 8: 9–35.Google Scholar
  56. Foissner, W., H. Blatterer, H. Berger & F. Kohmann, 1991. Taxonomische und ökologische Revision der Ciliaten des Saprobiensystems. Band I: Cyrtophorida, Oligotrichida, Hypotrichida, Colpodea. Informationsberichte des Bayer. Landesamtes für Wasserwirtschaft Heft 1: 1–471.Google Scholar
  57. Frey, D., 1964. Remains of animals in Quaternary lake and bog sediments and their intepretation. In Elster H. & W. Ohle (eds.) Ergebnisse der Limnologie. Arch. Hydrobiol. Beiheft 2, 114 pp.Google Scholar
  58. Golemansky, V., 1967. Matériaux sur la systématique et ľécologie des Thécamoebiens (Protozoa, Rhizopoda) du lac ďOhrid. Sect. Sci. Nat. Univ. Skopje 14: 3–26.Google Scholar
  59. Golemansky, V., 1971. Taxonomische und zoogeographische Notizen liber die thekamöbe Fauna (Rhizopoda, Testacea) der Küstengrundgewässer der sowjetischen Fernostküste (Japanisches Meer) und der Westküste Kanadas (Stiller Ozean). Arch. Protistenkd. 113: 235–249.Google Scholar
  60. Golemansky, V., 1981. Description de trois thécamoebiens (Protozoa, Rhizopoda) nouveaux des eaux souterreines littorales des mers. Acta Protozoologica 20: 115–119.Google Scholar
  61. Golemansky, V., 1990. Interstitial testate amoebas (Rhizopoda: Testacea) from the mediterranean basin. Stygologia 5: 49–54.Google Scholar
  62. Golemansky, V, 1991. Thécamoebiens mésopsammiques (Rhizopoda: Arcellinida, Gromida & Monothalamida) du sublittoral marin de ľAtlantique dans la région de Roscoff (France). Arch. Protistenkd. 140: 35–43.Google Scholar
  63. Golemansky, V., 1994. On some ecological preferences of marine interstitial testate amoebas. Arch. Protistenkd. 144: 424–32.Google Scholar
  64. Griffin, J. L., 1972. Movement, fine structure and fusion of pseudopods of an enclosed amoeba, Difflugiella sp. J. Cell Sci. 10: 563–583.Google Scholar
  65. Grospietsch, Th., 1952. Die Rhizopodenanalyse als Hilfsmittel der Moorforschung. Die Naturwiss. 39: 318–323.Google Scholar
  66. Grospietsch, Th., 1957. Beitrag zur Rhizopodenfauna des Lago Maggiore. Arch. Hydrobiol. 53: 323–331.Google Scholar
  67. Grospietsch, Th., 1972a. Wechseltierchen. Kosmos Gesellschaft der Naturfreunde, Franckh’sche Verlagshandlung, Stuttgart, 87 pp.Google Scholar
  68. Grospietsch, Th., 1972b. Testacea und Heliozoa. In Elster, H.-J. & W. Ohle (eds.) Das Zooplankton der Binnengewässer. I. Schweizerbarth, Stuttgart: 1–30.Google Scholar
  69. Grospietsch, Th., 1972c. Neue Ergebnisse der Rhizopodenanalyse für die Moorforschung. Verh. Int. Verein. Limnol. 18: 1031–1038.Google Scholar
  70. Grospietsch, Th., 1975. Beitrag zur Kenntnis der Testaceen-Fauna des Lago Valencia (Venezuela). Verh. Internal. Verein. Limnol. 19: 2778–2784.Google Scholar
  71. Haman, D. & B. Kohl, 1994. A Thecamoebinid Assemblage from Lake Cocococha, Tambopata Reserve, Madre de Dios Province, Southeastern Peru. J. Foramin. Res. 24: 226–232.Google Scholar
  72. Harnisch, O., 1927. Einige Daten zur rezenten und fossilen testaceen Rhizopodenfauna der Sphagnen. Arch. Hydrobiologie XVIII: 345–360.Google Scholar
  73. Harnisch, O., 1958. Rhizopoda. In Brohmer, P., P. Ehrmann & G. Ulmer (eds.) Tierwelt Mitteleuropas. 1, 1b: 1–75.Google Scholar
  74. Hasle, G. R., 1978. The inverted-microscope method. In Sournia, A. (ed.) Phytoplankton Manual, 88–96. Monographs on Oceanographic Methodology 6, UNESCO, Paris, France. 337 p.Google Scholar
  75. Hedley, R. H., C. G. Ogden & N. J. Mordan, 1977. Biology and fine structure of Cryptodifflugia oviformis (Rhizopodea: Protozoa). Bull. Br. Mus. Nat. Hist. Zool. 30: 313–328.Google Scholar
  76. Hendon, D. & D. Charman, 1997. The preparation of testate amoebae (Protozoa: Rhizopoda) samples from peat. The Holocene 7: 199–205.Google Scholar
  77. Hesmer, H., 1929. Mikrofossilien in Torfen. Paläontologische Ztschr. 11: 245–257.Google Scholar
  78. Lagerheim, G., 1901. Om lämningar af Rhizopoden, Heliozoer och Tintinnider i S veriges och Finlands lakustrina Kvartäraflagringar. Geol. Fören. Stockh. Förhandl. 23: 469–520.Google Scholar
  79. Laminger, H., 1972. Die profundale Testaceenfauna (Protozoa, Rhizopoda) älterer und jüngerer Bodensee-Sedimenten. Arch. Hydrobiol. 70: 108–129.Google Scholar
  80. Laminger, H., 1973a. Quantitative Untersuchungen über die Testaceenfauna (Protozoa, Rhizopoda) in den jüngsten Bodensee-Sedimenten. Biol. Jb. Dodonaea 41: 126–146.Google Scholar
  81. Laminger, H., 1973b. Untersuchungen über Abundanz und Biomasse der sedimentbewohnenden Testaceen (Protozoa, Rhizopoda) in einem Hochgebirgssee (Vorderer Finstertaler See, Kühtai, Tirol). Int. Rev. ges. Hydrobiol. 58: 543–568.Google Scholar
  82. Laminger, H., R. Zisette, S. Phillips & F. Breidigam, 1979. Contribution to the Knowledge of the Protozoan Fauna of Montana (USA): I. Testate Amoebae (Rhizopods) in the Surrounding of Flathead Lake Valley. Hydrobiologia 65: 257–271.Google Scholar
  83. Lee, J. J., S. H. Hutner & E. C. Bovee, (eds.), 1985. An illustrated Guide to the Protozoa. Lawrence, Kansas, 629 pp.Google Scholar
  84. Leidy, J., 1879. Fresh-water rhizopods of North America. Government Printing Office, Washington, 324 pp.Google Scholar
  85. Lena, H., 1982. Benthic Testacida (Rhizopoda,Protozoa) of Lake Washington, Brevard County, Florida. Biol. Sci. 45: 101–106.Google Scholar
  86. Loeblich, A. R., JR. & H. Tappan, 1964. Sarcodina Chiefly “Thecamoebians” and foraminiferida. In Moore, R. C. (ed.) Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology. Geol. Soc. Am. and Univ. Kansas Press, Lawrence, Kansas: Part C, Protista 2: 1–54.Google Scholar
  87. Lopez-Saez, J., B. van Geel, S. Farbos-Texier & M. Diot, 1998. Remarques paléoécologiques à propos de quelques palynomorphes non-polliniques provenant de sédiments quaternaires en France. Revue Paléobiol. 17: 445–459.Google Scholar
  88. Lousier, J. & D. Parkinson, 1981. The disappearance of the empty tests of litter-and soil testate amoebae (Testacea, Rhizopoda, Protozoa). Arch. Protistenkd. 124: 312–336.Google Scholar
  89. Lüftenegger, G., W. Petz, H. Berger, W. Foissner & H. Adam, 1988. Morphologic and Biometric Characterization of Twenty-four Soil Testate Amoebae (Protozoa, Rhizopoda). Arch. Protistenkd. 136: 153–189.Google Scholar
  90. McCarthy, F., E. Collins, J. McAndrews, H. Kerr, D. Scott & F. Medioli, 1995. A comparison of postglacial arcellacean (“Thecamoebian”) and pollen succession in atlantic Canada, illustrating the potential of arcellaceans for paleoclimatic reconstruction. J. Paleontol. 69: 980–993.Google Scholar
  91. Medioli, F., D. Scott & B. H. Abbott, 1987. A case study of protozoan intraclonal variability taxonomic implications. J. Foramin. Res. 17, 1: 28–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Medioli, F. & D. Scott, 1988. Lacustrine Thecamoebians (mainly Arcellaceans) as potential tools for paleolimnological interpretations. Palaeogeogr., Palaeoclim., Palaeoecol. 62: 361–386.Google Scholar
  93. Medioli, F., D. Scott, E. Collins & J. Wall, 1990. Thecamoebians from the early Cretaceous deposits of Ruby Creek, Alberta (Canada). In Hemleben et al. (eds.) Paleoecology. Biostratigraphy. Paleoceanography and Taxonomy of Agglutinated Foraminifera: 793–812.Google Scholar
  94. Medioli, F., A. Asioli & G. Parenti, 1994. Manuale per ľidentificazione e la classificazione delle tecamebe con informazioni sul loro significato paleoecologico e stratigrafico. Palaeopelagos 4: 317–364.Google Scholar
  95. Medioli, F., D. Scott, E. Collins, S. Asioli & E. Reinhardt, 1999. The thecamoebian bibliography. Palaeontologia Electron. 3, 1:161 pp. http://www-odp.tamu.edu/paleo/1999_l/biblio/issuel_99.htm.
  96. Meisterfeld, R., 1977. Die horizontale und vertikale Verteilung der Testaceen (Rhizopoda, Testacea) in Sphagnum. Arch. Hydrobiol. 79: 319–356.Google Scholar
  97. Meisterfeld, R., 1979. Clusteranalytische Differenzierung der Testaceenzönosen (Rhizopoda, Testacea) in Sphagnum. Arch. Protistenkd. 121: 270–307.Google Scholar
  98. Meisterfeld, R., 1984. Taxonomic problems in ‘Difflugia’ species with lobed aperture-biometry and impact of supplied building material. J. Protozool. 31 (Suppl.) 62A: 226.Google Scholar
  99. Meisterfeld, R., 2001a. Order Arcellinida. In Lee, J. J. et al. (eds.) The Illustrated Guide to the Protozoa. Second Edition. Allen Press, Lawrence, 1400 pp.Google Scholar
  100. Meisterfeld, R., 2001b. Testate amoebae with filopodia. In Lee, J. J. et al. (eds.) The Illustrated Guide to the Protozoa. Second Edition. Allen Press, Lawrence, 1400 pp.Google Scholar
  101. Meisterfeld, R. & M. Heisterbaum, 1986. The decay of empty tests of testate amoebae (Rhizopoda, Protozoa). Symposia Biologica Hungarica 33: 285–390.Google Scholar
  102. Meisterfeld, R. & L. Tan, 1998. First Records of Testate Amoebae (Protozoa, Rhizopoda) from Mount Buffalo National Park, Victoria: Preliminary Notes. Vic. Naturalist 115: 231–238.Google Scholar
  103. Mignot, J. P. & I. B. Raikov, 1992. Evidence of meiosis in the Testate Amoeba Arcella. J. Protozool. 39, 2: 287–289.Google Scholar
  104. Mori, S. & T. Miura, 1980. List of plant and animal species living in Lake Biwa. Mem. Fac. Sci. Kyoto Univ., Ser. Biol. 8: 1–33.Google Scholar
  105. Müller, H., 1970. Ökologische Veränderungen im Otterstedter See im Laufe der Nacheiszeit. Ber. Naturhist. Ges. 114: 33–47.Google Scholar
  106. Ogden, C. G., 1984. Shell structure of some testate Amoebae from Britain (Protozoa Rhizopoda). J. Nat. Hist. 18: 341–361.Google Scholar
  107. Ogden, C. G., 1990. The structure of the shell wall in testate amoebae and the importance of the organic cement matrix. In Claugher, D. (ed.) Scanning Electron Microscopy in Taxonomy and Functional Morphology. Syst. Ass. Special Vol., Clarendon Press, Oxford: 41: 235–257.Google Scholar
  108. Ogden, C. G. & R. L. Ellison, 1988. The value of the organic cement matrix in the identification of the shells of fossil testate amoebae. J. Micropalaeontol. 7: 233–240.Google Scholar
  109. Ogden, C. G. & R. H. Hedley, 1980. An Atlas of Freshwater Testate Amoebae. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 222 pp.Google Scholar
  110. Ogden, C. G. & R. Meisterfeld, 1989. The taxonomy and systematics of some species of Cucurbitella, Difflugia and Netzelia (Protozoa: Rhizopoda); with an evaluation of diagnostic characters. Europ. J. Protistol. 25: 109–128.Google Scholar
  111. Ogden, C. G. & R. Meisterfeld, 1991. The biology and ultrastructure of the testate amoeba, Difflugia lucida Penard (Protozoa, Rhizopoda). Europ. J. Protistol. 26: 256–269.Google Scholar
  112. Ogden, C. G. & P. Pitta, 1990. Biology and ultrastructure of the mycophagous, soil testate amoeba, Phryganella acropodia (Rhizopoda, Protozoa). Biol. Fertil. Soils 9: 101–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  113. Page, F. C., 1987. The classification of “naked” amoebae (Phylum, Rhizopoda). Arch. Protistenkd. 133: 199–217.Google Scholar
  114. Patterson, R., K. MacKinnon, D. Scott & F. Medioli, 1985. Arcellaceans in small lakes of New Brunswick and Nova Scotia: modern distribution and holocene stratigraphic changes. J. Foramin. Res. 15: 114–137.Google Scholar
  115. Penard, E., 1902. Faune rhizopodique du bassin de Léman. Kündig, Genf, 714 pp.Google Scholar
  116. Poinar, G. O., B. M. Waggoner & U. Bauer, 1993. Terrestrial Soft-Bodied Protists and Other Microorganisms in Triassic Amber. Science 259: 222–224.Google Scholar
  117. Pokorny, V., 1975. Grundzüge der Zoologischen Mikropaläontologie. Band 1. O. Koeltz Science Publ., Königstein, 582 pp.Google Scholar
  118. Ruzicka, E., 1982. Die subfossilen Testaceen des Krottensees (Salzburg, Österreich). Limnologica 14: 49–88.Google Scholar
  119. Schönborn, W., 1962. Die Ökologie der Testaceen im oligotrophen See, dargestellt am Beispiel des Grossen Stechlinsees. Limnologica 1: 111–182.Google Scholar
  120. Schönborn, W., 1963. Die Stratigraphie lebender Testaceen im Sphagnetum der Hochmoore. Limnologica 1: 315–321.Google Scholar
  121. Schönborn, W., 1966a. Beschalte Amöben (Testacea). Die neue Brehm-Bücherei, Ziemsen Verlag, Wittenberg Lutherstadt, 112 pp.Google Scholar
  122. Schönborn, W., 1966b. Beitrag zur Ökologie und Systematik der Testaceen Spitzbergens. Limnologica 4: 463–470.Google Scholar
  123. Schönborn, W., 1967. Taxozönotik der beschalten Süβwasser-Rhizopoden. Eine raumstruktur-analytische Untersuchung über Lebensraumerweiterung und Evolution bei der Mikrofauna. Limnologica 5: 159–207.Google Scholar
  124. Schönborn, W., 1973. Paläolimnologische Studien an Testaceen aus Bohrkernen des Latnjajaure (Abisko-Gebiet; Schwedisch-Lappland). Hydrobiologia 42: 63–75.Google Scholar
  125. Schönborn, W., 1975. Studien über die Testaceenbesiedlung der Seen und Tümpel des Abiskogebietes (Schwedisch-Lappland). Hydrobiologia 46: 115–139.Google Scholar
  126. Schönborn, W., 1981. Population dynamics and production of Testacea in the River Saale. Zool. Jb. Syst. 108: 301–313.Google Scholar
  127. Schönborn, W., 1984. Studies on Remains of Testacea in Cores of the Great Woryty Lake (NE-Poland). Limnologica 16: 185–190.Google Scholar
  128. Schönborn, W., 1989. The topophenetic analysis as a method to elucidate the phylogeny of testate amoebae (Protozoa, Testacealobosia and Testaceafilosia). Arch. Protistenkd. 127: 223–245.Google Scholar
  129. Schönborn, W., 1990. Analyse subfossiler Protozoenschalen der Sedimente eines kleinen sauren Waldsees (Kleiner Barsch-See, Nördliche DDR). Limnologica 21: 137–145.Google Scholar
  130. Schönborn, W., 1992. Comparative studies on the production biology of protozoan communities in freshwater and soil ecosystems. Arch. Protistenkd. 141: 187–214.Google Scholar
  131. Schönborn, W., D. Flössner & G. Proft, 1965. Die limnologische Charakterisierung des Profundals einiger norddeutscher Seen mit Hilfe von Testaceen-Gemeinschaften. Limnologica 3: 371–380.Google Scholar
  132. Schönborn, W., W. Foissner & R. Meisterfeld, 1983. Licht-und Rasterelektronenmikroskopische Untersuchungen zur Schalenmorphologie und Rassenbildung bodenbewohnender Testaceen (Protozoa, Rhizopoda) sowie Vorschlägezur biometrischen Charakterisierung von Testaceen-Schalen. Protistologica 19: 553–566.Google Scholar
  133. Schönborn, W. & T. Peschke, 1988. Biometric studies on species, races, ecophenotypes and individual variations of soil-inhabiting testacea (Protozoa, Rhizopoda), including Trigonopyxisminuta n.sp. and Corythion asperulum n.sp. Arch. Protistenkd. 136: 345–363.Google Scholar
  134. Schönborn, W. & T. Peschke, 1990. Evolutionary studies on the Assulina-Valkanovia complex (Rhizopoda, Testaceafilosia) in Sphagnum and soil. Biol. Fertil. Soils 9, 2: 95–100.Google Scholar
  135. Scott, D. & F. Medioli, 1978. Vertical zonation of marsh foraminifera as accurate indicators of former sea-levels. Nature 272: 538–541.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  136. Scott, D. & F. Medioli, 1983. Testate rhizopods in Lake Erie: modern distribution and stratigraphic implications. J. Paleontol. 57: 809–820.Google Scholar
  137. Shen, Y., 1980. Ecological studies on the periphytic protozoa in Lake Dong Hu, Wuhan. Acta Hydrobiologica Sinica 7: 19–40.Google Scholar
  138. Smith, H. G., 1992. Distribution and ecology of the testate rhizopod fauna of the continental antarctic zone. Polar Biol. 12: 629–634.Google Scholar
  139. Smith, H. G. & D. Wilkinson, 1986. Biogeography of testate rhizopods in the southern temperate and antarctic zones. Colloque sur les écosystèmes terrestres subantarctiques, Paimpont, C.N.F.R.A. 58: 83–96.Google Scholar
  140. Stepanek, M., 1963. Die Rhizopoden aus Katanga (Kongo-Afrika). Annls. Mus. R. Afr. Cent.(Zool.) Serie IN 8, 117: 8–91 with 20 plates.Google Scholar
  141. Stepanek, M., 1967. Testacea des Benthos der Talsperre Vranov am Thayafluss. Hydrobiologia 29: 1–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  142. Stepanek, M., 1968. Die Rhizopoden des Tiefenschlammes im Bodensee. Archiv Hydrobiologie suppl. 33: 442–50.Google Scholar
  143. Stockmarr, J., 1971. Tablets with spores used in absolute pollen analysis. Pollen et Spores 13: 615–621.Google Scholar
  144. Todorov, M. & V. Golemansky, 1998. Testate amoebae (Protozoa, Rhizopoda) of the coastal lakes Shabla and Ezerets (Northeastern Bulgaria), with a description of Pentagonia shablensis sp. nov. In Biodiversity of Shabla Lake System. Sofia, “Prof. Marin, Drinov” Acad. Publ. House: 69–90.Google Scholar
  145. Tolonen, K., 1986. Rhizopod analysis. In Berglund (ed.) Handbook of Holocene Palaeoecology and Palaeohydrology. J. Wiley & Sons, Chichester: 645–666.Google Scholar
  146. Tolonen, K., B. Warner & H. Vasander, 1992. Ecology of Testaceans in mires in Southern Finland: I. Autecology. Arch. Protistenkd. 142: 119–138.Google Scholar
  147. Tolonen, K., B. Warner & H. Vasander, 1994. Ecology of Testaceans in mires in southern Finland: II. Multivariate analysis. Arch. Protistenkd. 144: 97–112.Google Scholar
  148. Trappeniers, K., A. Van Kerckvoorde, D. Chardez, I. Nijs & L. Beyens, 1999. Ecology of testate amoebae communities from aquatic habitats in the Zackenberg area (Northeast Greenland). Polar Biology 22: 271–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  149. Utermöhl, H., 1958. Zur Vervollkommnung der quantitativen Phytoplankton-Methodik. Intern. Ver. theoret. angew. Limnol., Mitt. 9: 1–39.Google Scholar
  150. Van Geel, B., 1976. A paleoecological study of Holocene peat bog sections, based on the analysis of Pollen, Spores and Macro-and Microscopic Remains of Fungi, Alga, Cormophytes and Animals. Ph.D. thesis, Universiteit Amsterdam, 75 pp.Google Scholar
  151. Van Geel, B., S. Bohncke & H. Dee, 1981. A palaeoecological study of an upper Late Glacial and Holocene sequence from “De Borchert”, The Netherlands. Rev. Palaebot. Palynol. 31: 367–448.Google Scholar
  152. Vucetich, M. C., 1976. Tecamebianos del Lago San Roque y de un Ambiente Lentico Artificial Vinculado al Mismo (Cordoba, Argentina). Limnobios 1: 29–34.Google Scholar
  153. Wailes, G. H. & J. Hopkinson, 1919. The British Freshwater Rhizopoda and Heliozoa IV. Ray Soc. London, 130 pp.Google Scholar
  154. Wanner, M., 1988. Biometrische und rasterelektronenmikroskopische Untersuchungen an Testaceen-Schalen (Protozoa: Rhizopoda). Arch. Protistenkd. 136: 97–106.Google Scholar
  155. Wanner, M., S. Esser & R. Meisterfeld, 1994. Effects of light, temperature, fertilizers and pesticides on growth of the common freshwater and soil species Cyclopyxis kahli (Rhizopoda, Testacealobosia) interactions and adaptations. Limnologica 24: 239–250.Google Scholar
  156. Wanner, M. & R. Meisterfeld, 1994. Effects of some environmental factors on the Shell Morphology of Testate Amoebae (Rhizopoda, Protozoa). Europ. J. Protistol. 30: 191–195.Google Scholar
  157. Warner, B., 1988. Methods in quaternary ecology # 5. Testate amoebae (Protozoa). Geoscience Canada 15: 251–260.Google Scholar
  158. Warner, B. & D. Charman, 1994. Holocene changes on a peatland in northwestern Ontario interpreted from testate amoebae analysis. Boreas 23: 270–279.Google Scholar
  159. Warner, B. & J. Chmielewski, 1992. Testate amoebae as indicators of drainage in a forested mire, Northern Ontario, Canada. Arch. Protistenkd. 141: 179–183.Google Scholar
  160. Wightman, W. G., D. B. Scott, F. S. Medioli & M. R. Gibling, 1994. Agglutinated foraminifera and thecamoebians from the late carboniferous Sydney coalfiled, Nova Scotia: paleoecology, paleoenvironments and paleogeographical implications. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 106: 187–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  161. Woodland, W., D. Charman & P. Sims, 1998. Quantitative estimates of water tables and soil moisture in holocene peatlands from testate amoebae. The Holocene 8: 261–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  162. Wylezich, C., R. Meisterfeld & M. Schlegel, 1999. Phylogeny of testate amoebae—a comparison of morphological and molecular characters. Zoology 102, Supplement II: 12.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Louis Beyens
    • 1
  • Ralf Meisterfeld
    • 2
  1. 1.Departement Biologie Sectie Polaire Ecologie, Limnologie en PaleobiologieUniversiteit Antwerpen (UA)AntwerpenBelgium
  2. 2.Institut für Biologie II (Zoologie)Rheinisch Westfälische Technische Hochschule (RWTH) AachenAachenGermany

Personalised recommendations