Medical Ethics as Reflective Practice

  • Ronald A. Carson
Part of the Philosophy and Medicine book series (PHME, volume 50)


Medical Ethic Moral Theory Good Reading Reflective Practice Moral Inquiry 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Baier, A.: 1985, ‘Theory and reflective practices’, in Postures of the Mind: Essays on Mind and Morals, Methuen, London, U. K.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Beauchamp, T. L., and J. F. Childress: 1979, Principles of Biomedical Ethics, 4th ed., Oxford University Press, New York, NY.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Beauchamp, T. L.: 1995, ‘Principism and its alleged competitors’, Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 5, 181–198.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Brody, B. A.: 1988, ‘Introduction’, Moral Theory and Moral Judgments in Medical Ethics, Kluwer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, pp. 1–12.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Carson, R. A.: 1990, ‘Interpretive bioethics: The way of discernment’, Theoretical Medicine 11, 51–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Carson, R. A.: 1995, ‘Interpretation’, in W. T. Reich (ed.), Encyclopedia of Bioethics, 2nd ed., Simon & Schuster, New York, NY.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Childress, J. F.: 1994, ‘Principles-oriented bioethics: An analysis and assessment from within’, in du Bose, E. R., Hamel, R. P., and O’Connell, L. J. (eds.), A Matter of Principles? Ferment in U. S. Bioethics, Trinity Press International, Valley Forge, PA, pp. 72–100.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Childress, J. F.: 1994, ‘Ethical theories, principles, and casuistry in bioethics: An interpretation and defense of principlism’, in P. F. Camenisch (ed.), Religious Methods and Resources in Bioethics, Kluwer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, pp. 181–201.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Clouser, K. D. and Gert, B.: 1990, ‘A critique of principlis’, The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 15, 219–236.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gustafson, J. M.: 1965, ‘Context versus principles’, Harvard Theological Review 58, 191.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Jonsen, A. R. and Toulmin, S.: 1988, The Abuse of Casuistry, University of California Press, Berkeley, CA.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    MacIntyre, A.: 1984, After Virtue, 2nd ed., University of Notre Dame Press, Notre Dame, IN.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kirk, K. E.: 1933, Conscience and Its Problems: An Introduction to Casuistry, Longmans, Green, London, U. K.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Mitchell, W. J. T.: 1985, ‘Introduction’, in W. J. T. Mitchell (ed.), Against Theory: Literary Studies and the New Pragmatism, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Oakeshott, M., 1962: Rationalism in Politics, Methuen, London, U. K.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Phillips, D. Z. and Mounce, H. O.: 1970, Moral Practices, Schocken Books, New York, NY.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ramsey, P.: 1970, The Patient as Person, Yale University Press, New Haven, CT.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Taylor, C.: 1993, ‘To follow a rule...’, in Calhoun, C., LiPuma, E., and Postone, M. (eds.), Bourdieu: Critical Perspectives, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Turner, S.: 1994, The Social Theory of Practices, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Walzer, M.: 1987, Interpretation and Social Criticism, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ronald A. Carson
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute for the Medical HumanitiesThe University of Texas Medical BranchGalvestonUSA

Personalised recommendations