Advertisement

Measuring the Non-Measurable: Towards the Development of Indicators for Measuring Human Trafficking

  • Sonia Stefanizzi
Chapter
  • 3k Downloads

Abstract

This chapter does not focus so much on the empirical aspects of trafficking in human beings, nor does it aim at demonstrating the inadequacy of available statistical data or suggesting the best definition and the most efficient methods for measuring the phenomenon. It examines the problem from a different angle, by reflecting upon the instability that characterizes all knowledge based on empirical research and, particularly, upon the reflexivity of knowledge and social practices. Over the last twenty years, the phenomenon of trafficking in human beings, as well as that of immigration, have been controversial ‘‘objects’’ of measurement, as regards both the number and the characteristics of the individuals at risk and of the victims. This area of study involves a plurality of data at various levels, which frequently, if not always, prove fragmentary and difficult to compare. The following essay examines the main factors behind this phenomenon, factors which cannot all be easily or quickly eliminated, whether in theory or in practice.

Keywords

Sexual Exploitation Human Trafficking Criminal Organization Migration Policy Permanent Residence 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Atkinson J.M.(1978). Discovering Suicide. Studies in the Social Organization of Sudden Death. London: MacMillan.Google Scholar
  2. Bonifazi, Carlo. (1998). L’immigrazione straniera in Italia.Bologna: Il Mulino.Google Scholar
  3. Giddens, Anthony. (1990). The consequences of Modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  4. Kritz, Mary M. (1987). International migration policies: conceptual problems. International Migration Review,vol 21,4.Google Scholar
  5. Kuhn Thomas. (1962). The structure of scientific revolution. Chicago: The University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Moisès, Naim. (2005). Illecito. Milano: Mondadori.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sonia Stefanizzi
    • 1
  1. 1.University of Milan-BicoccaMilanItaly

Personalised recommendations