Psychologizing Cartesian Doubt Feminist Reading Strategies and the “Unthought” of Philosophy

  • Martina Reuter
Part of the The New Synthese Historical Library book series (SYNL, volume 55)


Material Thing Phenomenological Reduction Distinct Idea Philosophical Text Feminist Interpretation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Alanen, Lilli. “Descartes’s dualism and the philosophy of mind.” Revue de Métaphysique et de Morale. No 3 (1989): 391–413.Google Scholar
  2. Alanen, Lilli.. “Cartesian Ideas and Intentionality.” In Language, Knowledge and Intentionality: Perspectives on the Philosophy of Jaakko Hintikka, edited by Leila Haaparanta, Martin Kush and Ilkka Niiniluoto. Helsinki: Acta Philosophica Fennica, vol. 49, 1990.Google Scholar
  3. Alanen, Lilli. Descartes’s Concept of Mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2003.Google Scholar
  4. Atherton, Margaret. “Cartesian Reason and Gendered Reason.” In A Mind of One’s Own: Feminist Essays on Reason and Objectivity, edited by Louise M. Anthony and Charlotte Witt. Boulder and Oxford: Westview Press, 1993.Google Scholar
  5. Bordo, Susan 1986: “The Cartesian Masculinisation of Thought.” Signs 11, no. 3 (1986): 439–456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bordo, Susan. The Flight to Objectivity: Essays on Cartesianism and Culture. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1987.Google Scholar
  7. Bordo, Susan, ed. Feminist Interpretations of René Descartes. University Park, Penn.: The Pennsylvania State University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
  8. Bordo, Susan and Mario Moussa. “Rehabilitating the ‘I’.” In Feminist Interpretations of René Descartes, edited by Susan Bordo. University Park, Penn.: The Pennsylvania State University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
  9. Brentano, Franz. Psychology from an Empirical Standpoint, translated from the German by D. B. Terrell, Antos C. Rancurello and Linda L. McAlister, first published 1874. London and New York: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1973.Google Scholar
  10. Chodorow, Nancy. The Reproduction of Mothering. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1978.Google Scholar
  11. Cole, Eve Browning. Philosophy and Feminist Criticism: An Introduction. New York: Paragon House, 1993.Google Scholar
  12. Deleuze, Gilles and Félix Guattari. Qu’est-ce que la philosophie? Paris: Les Éditions de Minuit, 1991.Google Scholar
  13. Le Doeuff, Michèle. The Philosophical Imaginary, translated from the French by Colin Gordon, first published 1980. Oxford: Blackwell, 1989.Google Scholar
  14. Le Doeuff, Michèle. Hipparchia’s Choice: An Essay Concerning Women, Philosophy, etc. Oxford: Blackwell, 1991.Google Scholar
  15. Flax, Jane. “Political Philosophy and the Patriarchal Unconscious: A Psychoanalytic Perspective on Epistemology and Metaphysics.” In Discovering Reality: Feminist Perspectives on Epistemology, Metaphysics, Methodology, and Philosophy of Science, edited by Sandra Harding and Merrill B. Hintikka. Dordrecht: D. Reidell Publishing Company, 1983.Google Scholar
  16. Gueroult, Martial. Descartes’ Philosophy Interpreted According to the Order of Reasons. Volume II: The Soul and the Body, translated from the French by Roger Ariew, first published 1952. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1985.Google Scholar
  17. Haaparanta, Leila. “The Model of Geometry in Logic and Phenomenology.” Philosophia Scientiae 1, no. 2 (1996): 2–14.Google Scholar
  18. Heidegger, Martin. „Edmund Husserls Vorlesungen zur Phänomenologie des inneren Zeitbewusstseins. In Vorlesungen zur Phänomenologie des inneren Zeitbewusstseins, edited by Martin Heidegger, first published 1928. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag, 1980.Google Scholar
  19. Heidegger, Martin. History of the Concept of Time: Prolegomena, translated from the German by T. Kisel, first published 1979. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1985.Google Scholar
  20. Heinämaa, Sara. “Merleau-Ponty’s Modification of Phenomenology: Cognition, Passion and Philosophy.” Synthese 118, no. 1 (1999): 49–68.Google Scholar
  21. Heinämaa, Sara. “From Decisions to Passions: Merleau-Ponty’s Interpretation of Husserl’s Reduction.” In Merleau-Ponty’s Reading of Husserl, edited by Lester Embree and Ted Toadvine. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 2002.Google Scholar
  22. Heinämaa, Sara. “The living Body and Its Position in Metaphysics: Merleau-Ponty’s Dialogue with Descartes.” In Metaphysics, Facticity, Interpretation: Phenomenology in the Nordic Countries, edited by Dan Zahavi, Sara Heinämaa and Hans Ruin. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 2003.Google Scholar
  23. Heinämaa, Sara. “The Soul-Body Union and Its Sexuality: From Descartes to Merleau-Ponty and Descartes.” in this volume.Google Scholar
  24. Himanka, Juha. “Reduction In Concreto: Two Readings of the Idea of Phenomenology.” Recherches Husserliennes 11 (1999): 51–78.Google Scholar
  25. Husserl, Edmund. Phenomenology as Rigorous Science. In Phenomenology and the Crisis of Philosophy, translated from the German by Quentin Lauer, first published 1911. New York: Harper and Row, 1965.Google Scholar
  26. Husserl, Edmund. Ideas: General Introduction to Pure Phenomenology, translated from the German by W. R. Boyce Gibson, first published 1913. London: Collier Macmillan, 1962.Google Scholar
  27. Husserl, Edmund. The Idea of Phenomenology, translated from the German by William P. Alston and George Nakhnikian, first published 1950. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1973.Google Scholar
  28. Husserl, Edmund. Cartesian Meditations, translated from the German by Dorion Cairns, first published 1950. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1988.Google Scholar
  29. Husserl, Edmund. The Crisis of European Sciences and Transcendental Phenomenology: An Introduction to Phenomenological Philosophy, translated from the German by David Carr, first published 1954. Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 1989.Google Scholar
  30. Irigaray, Luce. Speculum of the Other Woman, translated from the French by Gillian C. Gill, first published 1974. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1986.Google Scholar
  31. Judovitz, Dalia. Subjectivity and Representation in Descartes: The Origins of Modernity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988.Google Scholar
  32. Judovitz, Dalia. The Culture of the Body: Genealogies of Modernity. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press, 2001.Google Scholar
  33. Keller, Evelyn Fox. Reflections on Gender and Science. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1985.Google Scholar
  34. Kenny, Anthony. Descartes: A Study of his Philosophy. First published 1968. Bristol: Thoemmes Press, 1993.Google Scholar
  35. Lloyd, Genevieve. The Man of Reason: ‘Male’ and ‘Female’ in Western Philosophy. First published 1984. London: Routledge, 1993.Google Scholar
  36. Lloyd, Genevieve. “Maleness, Metaphor, and the ‘Crisis’ of Reason.” In A Mind of One’s Own: Feminist Essays on Reason and Objectivity, edited by Louise M. Anthony and Charlotte Witt. Boulder and Oxford: Westview Press, 1993.Google Scholar
  37. Longino, Helen. “Subjects, Power and Knowledge: Description and Prescription in Feminist Philosophies of Science.” In Feminist Epistemologies, edited by Linda Alcoff and Elisabeth Potter. New York: Routledge, 1993.Google Scholar
  38. Marion, Jean-Luc. Cartesian Questions: Method and Metaphysics, translated from the French by John Cottingham, Stephen Voss and Jeffrey L. Kosky, first published 1991. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1999.Google Scholar
  39. Merleau-Ponty, Maurice. Phenomenology of Perception, translated from the French by Colin Smith, first published 1945. New York: Routledge, 1992.Google Scholar
  40. Merleau-Ponty, Maurice. “Phenomenology and the Sciences of Man,” first published 1953. In The Primacy of Perception and Other Essays on Phenomenological Psychology, the Philsophy of Art, History and Politics, edited by James M. Edie. Evanston: Nortwestern University Press, 1964.Google Scholar
  41. Merleau-Ponty, Maurice. Signs, translated by Richard McCleary, first published 1960. Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 1964.Google Scholar
  42. Merleau-Ponty, Maurice. The Prose of the World, edited by Claude Lefort and translated by John O’Neill. Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 1973.Google Scholar
  43. Reuter, Martina. “Descartes on the Body, Sexual Difference, and the Passions.” In Bios, Eros and Thanatos in Ancient and Early Modern Philosophy, edited by Vigdis Songe-Moller and Vibeke A. Tellmann. University of Bergen: Centre for Women’s and Gender Research, Volume No. 13, 2002.Google Scholar
  44. Reuter, Martina. “Tensions and Continuity: Merleau-Ponty on the History of Philosophy.” Paper at the Nordic Society of Phenomenology Meeting, University of Helsinki 25th–27th April 2003.Google Scholar
  45. Rodis-Lewis, Geneviève. Descartes: Biographie. Paris: Calmann-Lévy, 1995.Google Scholar
  46. Rorty, Amélie Oxenberg. “Descartes on thinking with the body.” In The Cambridge Companion to Descartes, edited by John Cottingham. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992.Google Scholar
  47. Rorty, Richard. Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1980.Google Scholar
  48. Ryle, Gilbert. The Concept of Mind. London: Hutchinson’s University Library, 1949.Google Scholar
  49. Schmitter, Amy Morgan. “The Passionate Intellect: On the Non-Opposition of Intellect and Emotion in Descartes.” Paper at the Central Division of the American Philosophical Association 1996.Google Scholar
  50. Scheman, Naomi. “Though This Be Method, Yet There Is Madness in It: Paranoia and Liberal Epistemology.” In A Mind of One’s Own: Feminist Essays on Reason and Objectivity, edited by Louise M. Anthony and Charlotte Witt. Boulder and Oxford: Westview Press, 1993.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Martina Reuter
    • 1
  1. 1.University of HelsinkiFinland

Personalised recommendations