Advertisement

Swiss Alcohol Policy — “Model” or “Sonderfall”?

  • R. Müller
Chapter

Abstract

Alcohol is not only an ordinary but the most easily available consumer commodity in Switzerland. The re-emergence of liberalism has led to the abolishment of many laws restricting alcohol availability. The globalization of the markets has significantly lowered the price of imported spirits and increased hard liquor consumption particularly among young people. In the minimally interventionist state the options for alcohol policy are restricted to information dissemination, educating the youth and to harm minimization without cutting down alcohol consumption. Alcohol policy should be judged by its impact in reducing alcohol problems. But the evidence is that those policy options that address economic and physical availability of alcoholic products are effective in reducing alcohol problems, whereas those policy options that address the responsibility of the individual and which privileged by neo-liberalism are largely ineffective. The Swiss Alcohol policy is neither a “model” nor a “Sonderfall” but simply a paradigm for the changing concern about the adverse consequences of drinking in times of neo-liberalism.

Key words

alcohol policy history globalization neo-liberalism self-responsibility harm reduction 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bruun, K., Edwards, G., Lumio, M., Mäkelä, K., Pan, L., Popham, R. E., et al. (1975). Alcohal Control Policies in Public Health Perspective. Helsinki: Finnish Foundation for Alcohol Studies.Google Scholar
  2. Buning, E. (1993). Presentation to workshop on “Harm Reduction and Health Promotion”. Fifth International Conference on Reduction of Alcohol-related Harm, Toronto.Google Scholar
  3. Cahannes, M., Müller, R. (1981). Alcohol Control Policy in Switzerland: An overview of political compromise. In. Single et al. 1981 (Eds.), Alcohol Society and the State. Vol. 2. Toronto: Addiction Research Foundation.Google Scholar
  4. El-Guebaly, N. (2001). A dialogue with the alcohol industry: prohibition or harm reduction. Letters to the editors. Addiction, 96, 515–516.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Jackson, M. C., Hastings, G., Wheeler, C. Eadie D., MacKintosh A. M. (2000). Marketing alcohol to young people: implications for industrie regulation and research policy. Addiction, 95 (Supplement4), 597–608.Google Scholar
  6. Klingemann, H. (1989). Supply and demand-oriented measures of alcohol policy in Switzerland-current trends and drawbacks. Health Promotion, Vol. 4, No. 4, 305–315.Google Scholar
  7. Kuo, M., Heeb, J.-L., Gmel, G., Rehm, J. (2003). Does Price matter? The effect of decreased price on spirits consumption in Switzerland. Alcol Cli Exp Res,, Vol 27, No 4, 720–725.Google Scholar
  8. Midanik, L. T., Rogers, J. D., & Greenfield, T. K. (2001). Mode differences in reports of alcohol consumption and alcohol-related harm. In M. L. Cynamon, R. A. Kulka (Eds.), Seventh Conference on Health Survey Research Methods (DHHS Publication No. PHS 01-1013, pp. 129–133). Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.Google Scholar
  9. Plant, M., Single, E., Stockwell, T. (1997). Alcohol — Minimization the harm. London/NewYork: Free Association Books.Google Scholar
  10. Schmid, H., Delgrande Jordan, M., Kuntsche, E. N., Kuendig, H. (2003). Trends im Konsum psychoaktiver Substanzen von Schülerrinnen und Schülern in der Schweiz. Lausanne: Schweizerische Fachstelle für Alkohol-und andere Drogenprobleme, Forschungsbericht 39.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • R. Müller

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations