Advertisement

FeatureC++: On the Symbiosis of Feature-Oriented and Aspect-Oriented Programming

  • Sven Apel
  • Thomas Leich
  • Marko Rosenmüller
  • Gunter Saake
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 3676)

Abstract

This paper presents FeatureC++, a novel language extension to C++ that supports Feature-Oriented Programming (FOP) and Aspect-Oriented Programming (AOP). Besides well-known concepts of FOP languages, FeatureC++ contributes several novel FOP language features, in particular multiple inheritance and templates for generic programming. Furthermore, FeatureC++ solves several problems regarding incremental software development by adopting AOP concepts. Starting our considerations on solving these problems, we give a summary of drawbacks and weaknesses of current FOP languages in expressing incremental refinements. Specifically, we outline five key problems and present three approaches to solve them: Multi Mixins, Aspectual Mixin Layers, and Aspectual Mixins that adopt AOP concepts in different ways. We use FeatureC++ as a representative FOP language to explain these three approaches. Finally, we present a case study to clarify the benefits of FeatureC++ and its AOP extensions.

Keywords

Language Extension Program Family Language Concept Multiple Inheritance Interface Extension 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Apel, S., Böhm, K.: Towards the Development of Ubiquitous Middleware Product Lines. In: Gschwind, T., Mascolo, C. (eds.) SEM 2004. LNCS, vol. 3437, pp. 137–153. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Apel, S., et al.: FeatureC++: Feature-Oriented and Aspect-Oriented Programming in C++. Technical report, Department of Computer Science, Otto-von-Guericke University, Magdeburg, Germany (2005)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Batory, D., et al.: Creating Reference Architectures: An Example from Avionics. In: Symposium on Software Reusability (1995)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Batory, D., Liu, J., Sarvela, J.N.: Refinements and Multi-Dimensional Separation of Concerns. In: ACM SIGSOFT (2003)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Batory, D., Sarvela, J.N., Rauschmayer, A.: Scaling Step-Wise Refinement. IEEE TSE 30(6) (2004)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Batory, D., Thomas, J.: P2: A Lightweight DBMS Generator. Journal of Intelligent Information Systems 9(2) (1997)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Cardone, R., et al.: Using Mixins to Build Flexible Widgets. In: AOSD (2002)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Cardone, R., Lin, C.: Comparing Frameworks and Layered Refinement. In: ICSE (2001)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Colyer, A., Clement, A.: Large-Scale AOSD for Middleware. In: AOSD (2004)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Colyer, A., Rashid, A., Blair, G.: On the Separation of Concerns in Program Families. Technical report, Computing Department, Lancaster University (2004)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Czarnecki, K., Eisenecker, U.: Generative Programming: Methods, Tools, and Applications. Addison-Wesley, Reading (2000)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Dijkstra, E.W.: A Discipline of Programming. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs (1976)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Eisenecker, U.W., Blinn, F., Czarnecki, K.: A Solution to the Constructor-Problem of Mixin-Based Programming in C++. In: Workshop on C++ Template Programming (2000)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Findler, R., Flatt, M.: Modular Object-Oriented Programming with Units and Mixins. In: ICFP (1998)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kendall, E.A.: Role Model Designs and Implementations with Aspect-Oriented Programming. In: OOPSLA (1999)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kiczales, G., et al.: Aspect-Oriented Programming. In: Aksit, M., Matsuoka, S. (eds.) ECOOP 1997. LNCS, vol. 1241, pp. 220–242. Springer, Heidelberg (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Laddad, R.: AspectJ in Action – Practical Aspect-Oriented Programming. Manning Publication Co. (2003)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Lieberherr, K.: Controlling the Complexity of Software Designs. In: ICSE (2004)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Lieberherr, K., Lorenz, D.H., Ovlinger, J.: Aspectual Collaborations: Combining Modules and Aspects. The Computer Journal (Special issue on AOP), 46(5) (2003)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Lopez-Herrejon, R., Batory, D., Cook, W.: Evaluating Support for Features in Advanced Modularization Technologies. In: Black, A.P. (ed.) ECOOP 2005. LNCS, vol. 3586, pp. 169–194. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Lopez-Herrejon, R.E., Batory, D.: Improving Incremental Development in AspectJ by Bounding Quantification. In: Software Engineering Properties and Languages for Aspect Technologies (2005)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Loughran, N., et al.: Supporting Product Line Evolution with Framed Aspects. In: AOSD ACP4IS Workshop (2004)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    McDirmid, S., Hsieh, W.: Aspect-Oriented Programming in Jiazzi. In: AOSD (2003)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Mezini, M., Ostermann, K.: Variability Management with Feature-Oriented Programming and Aspects. In: ACM SIGSOFT (2004)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Ostermann, K.: Dynamically Composable Collaborations with Delegation Layers. In: Magnusson, B. (ed.) ECOOP 2002. LNCS, vol. 2374, p. 89. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Ostermann, K., Mezini, M., Bockisch, C.: Expressive Pointcuts for Increased Modularity. In: Black, A.P. (ed.) ECOOP 2005. LNCS, vol. 3586, pp. 214–240. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Parnas, D.L.: Designing Software for Ease of Extension and Contraction. IEEE TSE SE-5(2) (1979)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Rajan, H., Sullivan, K.J.: Classpects: Unifying Aspect- and Object-Oriented Language Design. In: ICSE (2005)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Singhal, V., Batory, D.: P++: A Language for Large-Scale Reusable Software Components. In: Workshop on Software Reuse (1993)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Smaragdakis, Y., Batory, D.: Mixin-Based Programming in C++. In: Butler, G., Jarzabek, S. (eds.) GCSE 2000. LNCS, vol. 2177, p. 163. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Smaragdakis, Y., Batory, D.: Mixin Layers: An Object-Oriented Implementation Technique for Refinements and Collaboration-Based Designs. In: ACM TOSEM, vol. 11(2) (2002)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Tarr, P., et al.: N Degrees of Separation: Multi-Dimensional Separation of Concerns. In: ICSE (1999)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sven Apel
    • 1
  • Thomas Leich
    • 1
  • Marko Rosenmüller
    • 1
  • Gunter Saake
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Computer ScienceUniversity of MagdeburgGermany

Personalised recommendations