Language Games for Meaning Negotiation Between Human and Computer Agents

  • Arnaud Stuber
  • Salima Hassas
  • Alain Mille
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 3963)


We present a hybrid system that allows an actor to reuse her individual experience during a cooperative activity. The actor is member of a community which share a computer environment to assist their work. Firstly, an operational issue exists to capture, to represent and to manipulate the experience: we propose an formal grammar-based model. A semantic issue then exists to express the meaning of the experience: we detail our approach based on the mechanisms of the emergence of language. A prototype is presented to illustrate our proposal, some experiments are to come.


Emergence of Language Multi-Agent System Trace Based-Reasoning 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Champin, P.A., Prié, Y.: Musette: uses-based annotation for the Semantic Web. In: Annotation for the Semantic Web. OIS Press (2003)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Gorodetski, V.I., Kotenko, I.: Attacks against computer network: Formal grammar-based framework and simulation tool. In: Wespi, A., Vigna, G., Deri, L. (eds.) RAID 2002. LNCS, vol. 2516, pp. 219–238. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Martín, F.J., Plaza, E.: Ceaseless case-based reasoning. In: Funk, P., González Calero, P.A. (eds.) ECCBR 2004. LNCS, vol. 3155, pp. 287–301. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Maes, P.: Agents that reduce work and information overload. Communications of the ACM 37, 30–40, 146 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Lieberman, H.: Autonomous interface agents. In: ACM Conference on Human-Computer Interface CHI 1997, Atlanta (March 1997)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Steels, L.: Language as a complex adaptative system. In: Deb, K., Rudolph, G., Lutton, E., Merelo, J.J., Schoenauer, M., Schwefel, H.-P., Yao, X. (eds.) PPSN 2000. LNCS, vol. 1917. Springer, Heidelberg (2000)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    van Diggelen, J., Beun, R.J., Dignum, F., van Eijk, R.M., Meyer, J.J.: A decentralized approach for establishing a shared communication vocabulary. In: International workshop on agent mediated knowledge management 2005, held with AAMAS 2005 (2005)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Martin, F.J., Plaza, E., Arcos, J.L.: Knowledge and experience reuse through communication among competent (peer) agents. International Journal of Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering (1998)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ontan, S., Plaza, E.: Learning when to collaborate among learning agents. In: Flach, P.A., De Raedt, L. (eds.) ECML 2001. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2167, pp. 394–405. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kanawati, R., Malek, M.: A multi-agent system for collaborative bookmarking. In: Proceedings of the first international joint conference on Autonomous agents and multiagent systems, pp. 1137–1138. ACM Press, New York (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Blanzieri, E., Giorgini, P., Massa, P., Recla, S.: Implicit culture for multi-agent interaction support. In: Batini, C., Giunchiglia, F., Giorgini, P., Mecella, M. (eds.) CoopIS 2001. LNCS, vol. 2172, p. 27. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Stuber, A., Hassas, S., Mille, A.: Combining multiagents systems and experience reuse for assisting collective task achievement. In: McGinty, L. (ed.) ICCBR 2003 Workshop: From structured cases to unstructured problem solving episodes for experience-based assistance (2003)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Arnaud Stuber
    • 1
  • Salima Hassas
    • 1
  • Alain Mille
    • 1
  1. 1.CExAS Team – LIRISUniversité Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Bâtiment NautibusVilleurbanne

Personalised recommendations