Structural Properties of Shape-Spaces
- 533 Downloads
General properties of distance functions and of affinity functions are discussed in this paper. Reasons are given why a distance function for (n based shape-spaces should be a metric. Several distance functions that are used in shape-spaces are examined and it is shown that not all of them are metrics. It is shown which impact the type of the distance function has on the shape-space, in particular on the form of recognition or affinity regions in the shape-space. Affinity functions should be defined in such a way that they determine an affinity region with positive values inside that region and zero or negative values outside. The form of an affinity function depends on the type of the underlying distance function. This is demonstrated with several examples.
KeywordsShape-space distance function metric affinity function affinity region
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.Bersini, H.: Self-assertion versus self-recognition: A tribute to Francisco Varela. In: Proceedings of ICARIS 2002, Canterbury (2002)Google Scholar
- 2.De Boer, R.J.: Information processing in immune systems: Clonal selection versus idiotypic network models. In: Cell to Cell Signalling: From Experiments to Theoretical Models, pp. 285–302. Academic Press, London (1989)Google Scholar
- 3.De Boer, R.J., Perelson, A.S.: Size and connectivity as emergent properties of a developing immune network. J. of Theoretical Biology 149, 381–424 (1990)Google Scholar
- 5.Detours, V., Bersini, H., Stewart, J., Varela, F.: Development of an idiotypic network in shape-space. J. of Theoretical Biology 170 (1994)Google Scholar
- 6.Dilger, W., Strangfeld, S.: Properties of the Bersini experiment on self-assertion. In: Proceedings of GECCO 2006 (to appear, 2006)Google Scholar
- 10.McCarty, G.: Topology. In: An Introduction with Application to Topological Groups. McGraw-Hill, New York (1967)Google Scholar