Multi Bit Plane Image Steganography

  • Bui Cong Nguyen
  • Sang Moon Yoon
  • Heung-Kyu Lee
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 4283)


This paper addresses a novel steganography method for images. Most statistical steganalysis algorithms are strong to defeat previous steganography algorithms. RS steganalysis and pixel difference histogram analysis are two well-known statistical steganalysis algorithms which detect non-random changes caused by embedding a secret message into cover image. In this paper, we first explain how two steganalysis algorithms exploit the effect of the non-random changes and then propose a new steganography method that avoids the non-random changes to evade statistical analysis methods. For this purpose, we adjust the embedding process to be more adaptive to cover image by considering embedding in Gray code bit planes, not natural binary bit planes, of cover images, and two parameters: (1) similarity threshold for selecting non-flat area in lower bit planes, and (2) size of flat blocks n×n in embedding bit planes. Experimental results show that the secret messages embedded by our method are undetectable under RS steganalysis and pixel difference histogram analysis.


Cover Image Secret Message Histogram Analysis Embed Image Steganalysis Method 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. [1]
    Westfeld, A., Pfitzmann, A.: Attacks on Steganographic Systems. In: Pfitzmann, A. (ed.) IH 1999. LNCS, vol. 1768, pp. 61–76. Springer, Heidelberg (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    Provos, N.: Defending Against Statistical Steganalysis. In: Proceedings of the 10 USENIX Security Symposium, pp. 323–335 (2001)Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    Fridrich, J., Goljan, M., Du, R.: Reliable Detection of LSB Steganography in Color and Grayscale Images. In: Proc. of ACM Workshop on Multimedia and Security, Ottawa, CA, pp. 27–30 (October 2001)Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    Dumitrescu, S., Wu, X., Wang, Z.: Detection of LSB Steganography via Sample Pair Analysis. In: Petitcolas, F.A.P. (ed.) IH 2002. LNCS, vol. 2578, pp. 355–372. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    Lu, P., Luo, X., Tang, Q., Shen, L.: An Improved Sample Pairs Method for Detection of LSB Embedding. In: Fridrich, J. (ed.) IH 2004. LNCS, vol. 3200, pp. 116–127. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    Luo, X., Liu, B., Liu, F.: Detecting LSB Steganography Based on Dynamic Masks. In: 5th International Conference on Intelligent Systems Design and Applications, pp. 251–255 (2005)Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    Wu, D.C., Tsai, W.H.: A steganographic method for images by pixel-value differencing. Pattern Recognition Letter 24, 1613–1626 (2003)zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    Zhang, X., Wang, S.: Vulnerability of pixel-value differncing steganography to histogram analysis and modification for enhanced security. Pattern Recognition Letter 25, 331–339 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    Westfeld, A.: High Capacity Despite Better Steganalysis (F5.A Steganographic Algorithm). In: Moskowitz, I.S. (ed.) IH 2001. LNCS, vol. 2137, pp. 289–302. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Bui Cong Nguyen
    • 1
  • Sang Moon Yoon
    • 1
  • Heung-Kyu Lee
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of EECSKorea Advanced Institute of Science and TechnologyDaejeonRepublic of Korea

Personalised recommendations