Bose-einstein condensation of free excitons in AgBr

  • W. Czaja
Excitonic Molecules
Part of the Lecture Notes in Physics book series (LNP, volume 57)


Triplet excitons in AgBr are observed in photoluminescence at low temperatures with continuous near UV-excitation. The triplet exciton emission intensity varies strongly with temperature and excitation density. In particular this latter dependence supports the interpretation that these triplet excitons show Bose-Einstein condensation. The experiments also allow a determination of the critical temperature Tc. At low exciton densities φ,Tc changes according to the ideal gas behaviour (~φ2/3) but differently at high exciton densities. By analysing the experimental data we arrive at some general conclusion about the observability of Bose-Einstein condensation of excitons.


Excitation Density Triplet Exciton Exciton Density Solid State Comm Singlet Exciton 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. 1).
    P. Junod, CIBA-GEIGY Photochemie, Fribourg, Switzerland; J. Malinovski, Institute of Photoprocesses, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, Sofia, Bulgaria.Google Scholar
  2. 2).
    W. Czaja and C. F. Schwerdtfeger: Solid State Comm. 12 (1974) 87.Google Scholar
  3. 3).
    D. Baeriswyl and W. Czaja: RCA Review 36 (1975 5.Google Scholar
  4. 4).
    H. Kanzaki, S. Sakuragi, S. Hoshino, G. Shirane and Y. Fujii: Solid State Comm. 15 (1974) 1547Google Scholar
  5. 4)a.
    W. von der Osten and B. Dorner: Solid State Comm. 16 (1975) 43.Google Scholar
  6. 5).
    W. von der Osten and J. Weber: Solid State Comm. 14 (1974) 1133.Google Scholar
  7. 6).
    M. Matsushita: J. Phys. Soc. Japan 35 (1973) 1688.Google Scholar
  8. 7).
    G. M. Mason: Phys. Rev. B11 (1975) 5094Google Scholar
  9. 7)a.
    J. Tejeda, N. J. Shevchik, W. Braun, A. Goldman and M. Cardona: Phys. Rev. B (1975) to be published.Google Scholar
  10. 8).
    W. Czaja and C. F. Schwerdtfeger: Proc. Xll Int. Conf. Physics of Semicond., Stuttgart, 1974, ed. M. H. Pilkuhn (Teubner, Stuttgart, 1974) p.142.Google Scholar
  11. 9).
    W. Czaja: Proc. Xll Congrés Européen de Spectroscopie Moléculaire, Strasbourg, France 1975, ed. M. Grossmann, S. G. Elkomoss, and J. Ringeissen (Elsevier, Amsterdam 1976) p.155.Google Scholar
  12. 10).
    W. Czaja and D. Baeriswyl: Proc. 14th Int. Conf. Low Temp. Physics, Helsinki 1975 ed. M. Krusius and M. Vuorio, Vol.4 (North Holland Pub. Co., Amsterdam, 1976) p.429.Google Scholar
  13. 11).
    E. Tosatti: Phys. Rev. Letters 33 (1974) 1092.Google Scholar
  14. 12).
    Personal communication E. Tosatti: 1975. Although the mechanisms considered in ref. 11) are basically correct, the influence of the repulsive part has been overestimated.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1976

Authors and Affiliations

  • W. Czaja
    • 1
  1. 1.Laboratories RCA Ltd.ZurichSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations