Scheduling Models

Part of the GOR ■ Publications book series (GOR)


Schedule Problem Renewable Resource Precedence Constraint Schedule Model Feasible Schedule 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Reference Notes

  1. [13]
    Błlazewicz, J., Ecker, K., Pesch, E., Schmidt, G., Weglarz, J. (2001): Scheduling Computer and Manufacturing Processes, 2nd ed., Springer, BerGoogle Scholar
  2. [15]
    Böttcher, J., Drexl, A., Kolisch, R., Salewski, F. (1999): Project scheduling under partially renewable resource constraints, Management Science 45, 543–559.Google Scholar
  3. [16]
    Brucker, P. (2004): Scheduling Algorithms, 4th ed., Springer, Berlin.Google Scholar
  4. [17]
    Brucker, P., Drexl, A., Möhring, R.H., Neumann, K., Pesch, E. (1999): Resource-constrained project scheduling: notation, classification, models and methods, European Journal of Operational Research 112, 3–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. [24]
    Brucker, P., Knust, S. (2001): Resource-constrained project scheduling and timetabling, in: E. Burke, W. Erben (ed.): The Practice and Theory of Automated Timetabling III, Springer Lecture Notes in Computer Science 2079, 277–293.Google Scholar
  6. [29]
    Brucker, P., Schumacher, D. (1999): A new tabu search procedure for an audit-scheduling problem, Journal of Scheduling 2, 157–173.CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  7. [42]
    Demeulemeester, E., Herroelen, W. (2002): Project Scheduling, A Research Handbook, Kluwer, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  8. [46]
    Dodin, B., Elimam, A.A., Rolland, E. (1998): Tabu search in audit scheduling, European Journal of Operational Research 106, 373–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. [51]
    Drexl, A., Knust, S. (2004): Sports league scheduling: graph-and resource-based models, Osnabrücker Schriften zur Mathematik, No. 255, to appear in OMEGA — The International Journal of Management Science.Google Scholar
  10. [65]
    Hartmann, S. (2000): Packing problems and project scheduling models: an integrating perspective, Journal of the Operational Research Society 51, 1083–1092.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  11. [72]
    Herroelen, W., Demeulemeester, E., De Reyck, B. (1998): Resource-constrained project scheduling — A survey of recent developments, Computers & Operations Research 25, 279–302.CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  12. [88]
    Kolisch, R., Padman, R. (2001): An integrated survey of deterministic project scheduling, OMEGA — International Journal of Management Science 29, 249–272.Google Scholar
  13. [98]
    Leung, J.T. (2004): Handbook of Scheduling, CRC Press.Google Scholar
  14. [110]
    Neumann, K., Schwindt, C., Zimmermann, J. (2003): Project Scheduling with Time Windows and Scarce Resources — Temporal and Resource-Constrained Project Scheduling with Regular and Nonregular Objective Functions, Springer, Berlin.Google Scholar
  15. [116]
    Özdamar, L., Ulusoy, G. (1995): A survey on the resource-constrained project scheduling problem, IIE Transactions 27, 574–586.Google Scholar
  16. [122]
    Pinedo, M. (2001): Scheduling: Theory, Algorithms, and Systems, 2nd ed., Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  17. [123]
    Pinedo, M. (2005): Planning and Scheduling in Manufacturing and Services, Springer, Berlin.Google Scholar
  18. [128]
    Schaerf, A. (1995): A survey of automated timetabling, CWI-Report CS-R 9567, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  19. [129]
    Schirmer, A., Drexl, A. (2001): Allocation of partially renewable resources: Concept, capabilities, and applications, Networks 37, 21–34.CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  20. [141]
    Weglarz, J. (1998): Project Scheduling: Recent Models, Algorithms and Applications, Kluwer, Dordrecht.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2006

Personalised recommendations