Advertisement

Hausman Principal Component Analysis

  • Vartan Choulakian
  • Luigi Dambra
  • Biagio Simonetti
Conference paper
  • 1.6k Downloads
Part of the Studies in Classification, Data Analysis, and Knowledge Organization book series (STUDIES CLASS)

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to obtain discrete-valued weights of the variables by constraining them to Hausman weights (−1, 0, 1) in principal component analysis. And this is done in two steps: First, we start with the centroid method, which produces the most restricted optimal weights −1 and 1; then extend the weights to −1,0 or 1.

Keywords

Principal Component Analysis Centroid Method Multiple Factor Analysis Ordinary Principal Component Analysis Principal Component Analysis Loading 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. BURT, C. (1917): The Distribution And Relations Of Educational Abilities. P.S. King & Son: London.Google Scholar
  2. CADIMA, J., and JOLLIFFE, I.T. (1995): Loadings and correlations in the interpretation of principal components. Journal of Applied Statistics, 22, 203–214.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  3. CHIPMAN, H.A., and GU, H. (2003): Interpretable dimension reduction. To appear in Journal of Applied Statistics.Google Scholar
  4. CHOULAKIAN, V. (2001): Robust Q-mode principal component analysis in L1. Computational Statistics and Data Analysis, 37, 135–150.CrossRefzbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  5. CHOULAKIAN, V. (2003): The optimality of the centroid method. Psychometriks, 68, 473–475.Google Scholar
  6. CHOULAKIAN, V. (2005a): Transposition invariant principal component analysis in L1. Statistics and Probability Letters, 71,1, 23–31.CrossRefzbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  7. CHOULAKIAN, V. (2005b): L1-norm projection pursuit principal component analysis. Computational Statistics and Data Analysis, in press.Google Scholar
  8. Hausman, R.E. (1982): Constrained multivariate analysis. Studies in Management Sciences, 19, 137–151.zbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  9. JACKSON, J.E. (1991): A User’s Guide To Principal Components. Wiley: New York.Google Scholar
  10. JOLLIFFE, I.T. (2002): Principal Component Analysis. Springer Verlag: New York, 2nd edition.Google Scholar
  11. ROUSSON and GASSER (2004): Simple component analysis. Applied Statistics, 53, 539–556.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  12. THURSTONE, L.L. (1931): Multiple factor analysis. Psychological Review, 38, 406–427.Google Scholar
  13. VINES, S.K. (2000): Simple principal components. Applied Statistics, 49, 441–451.zbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  14. WOLD, H. (1966): Estimation of principal components and related models by iterative least squares. In Krishnaiah, P.R., ed.: Multivariate Analysis, Academic Press, N.Y., pp. 391–420.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Berlin · Heidelberg 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Vartan Choulakian
    • 1
  • Luigi Dambra
    • 2
  • Biagio Simonetti
    • 2
  1. 1.D’ept. de Math/StatistiqueUniversité de MonctonMonctonCanada
  2. 2.Dept. of Mathematics and StatisticsUniversity of Naples “Federico II”NapoliItaly

Personalised recommendations