Advertisement

The Mathematical Semantic Web

  • Massimo Marchiori
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 2594)

Abstract

How can Mathematics and the Semantic Web effectively join? In this paper we provide an account of the key standard technologies that can foster the integration of Mathematical representation into the Semantic Web.

Keywords

Mathematical Knowledge Resource Description Framework Mathematical Object Resource Description Framework Graph Resource Description Framework Schema 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1. A. Asperti, L. Padovani, C. S. Coen, I. Schena, XML,Stylesheets and the remmathematization of Formal Content, Proceedings of “Extreme Markup Languages 2001 Conference ”,2001.Available at http://www.cs.unibo.it/helm/extreme2001.ps.gz.
  2. 2. S. Boag et al.(Eds.), XQuery 1.0:An XML Query Language, World Wide Web Consortium Working Draft, November 2002. Latest version at http://www.w3.org/TR/xquery
  3. 3.
    D. Beckett (Ed.), RDF/XML Syntax Specification (Revised), World Wide Web Consortium Working Draft, November 2002. Latest version at http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-syntax-grammar.
  4. 4. P. V. Biron and A. Malhotra (Eds.), XML Schema Part 2:Datatypes, World Wide Web Consortium Recommendation, 2001.Available at http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema-2/.
  5. 5.
    D. Carlisle, P. Ion, R. Milner, N. Poppelier, Mathematical Markup Language (MathML)Version 2.0, World Wide Web Consortium Recommendation, 2001. Available at http://www.w3.org/TR/MathML2.
  6. 6.
    O. Caprotti and A. M. Cohen, A Type System for OpenMath, The OpenMath Consortium, 1999. Available at http://monet.nag.co.uk/cocoon/openmath/standard/ecc_OnlinePDF.pdf.
  7. 7.
    M. Dean et al (Eds.), Web Ontology Language (OWL)Reference Version 1.0 .World Wide Web Consortium Working Draft, November 2002. Latest version at http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-ref.
  8. 8.
    P. Hayes (Ed.), RDF Semantics, World Wide Web Consortium Working Draft, November 2002. Latest version at http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-mt/.
  9. 9.
    O. Lassila and R. Swick (Eds.), Resource Description Framework (RDF)Model and Syntax Specification , World Wide Web Consortium Recommendation, 1999. Available at http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-rdf-syntax.
  10. 10.
    A. Malhotra et al.(Eds.), XQuery 1.0 and XPath 2.0 Functions and Operators, World Wide Web Consortium Working Draft, November 2002. Latest version at http://www.w3.org/TR/xquery-operators/.
  11. 11.
    M. Marchiori (Ed.), The Platform for Privacy Preferences 1.0 (P3P1.0)Specification, World Wide Web Consortium Recommendation, 2002. Available at http://www.w3.org/TR/P3P.
  12. 12.
    B. McBride et al., An RDF Schema for P3P, World Wide Web Consortium Note. Latest version at http://www.w3.org/TR/p3p-rdfschema/.
  13. 13.
    H. Thompson et al.(Eds.), XML Schema Part 1:Structures, World Wide Web Consortium Recommendation, 2001. Available at http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema-1/.
  14. 14.
    Wolfram Research, Mathematical Functions. Available at http://functions.wolfram.com/.

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Massimo Marchiori
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.The World Wide Web Consortium, MITCambridgeUSA
  2. 2.Department of Computer ScienceUniversity of VeniceItaly

Personalised recommendations