Advertisement

Some Recent Results of Electromagnetic Nucleon Form Factors Measurements Using Transfer of Polarization

  • Damir Bosnar
Conference paper
  • 373 Downloads
Part of the Lecture Notes in Physics book series (LNP, volume 616)

Abstract

Described are measurements of the electric form factor of the neutron, and modification of the proton form factor in the medium, using transfer of polarization. Main features of the continous wave electron accelerator MAMI Mainz are outlined. Three high-resolution magnetic sepctrometers, and proton and neutron polarimeters of the A1 collaboration are described. Recent measurements of the neutron electric form factor in the reaction D( e,e n)p and measurements of the medium modification of the proton factor in the reaction 4 He( e,e’ p)3 H are pesented.

Keywords

Form Factor Polarization Transfer Plastic Scintillator Magnetic Spectrometer Neutron Polarization 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    H. Hermighaus et al., Proc. LINAC’90, 362 Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA (1990).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    K. Aulenbacher et al., Nucl. Instr. and Meth. A 391, 498 (1997).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    K.I. Blomqvist et al. Nulc. Instr. and Meth. A 403, 263 (1998).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Th. Pospischil et al.,accepted by Nulc. Instr. and Meth. A.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Th. Pospischil et al.,accepted by Nulc. Instr. and Meth. A.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Th. Pospischil, doctoral thesis, Mainz University 2000.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    M. Seimetz, Disertation in preparation, Institut für Kernphysik, Universität Mainz.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    T. N. Taddeucci et al., Nucl. Instr. Meth. A 241, 448 (1985).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    M. Ostrick et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 276 (1999).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    R.G. Sachs, Phys. Rev. 126, 2256 (1962).zbMATHCrossRefADSMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    R.G. Arnold, C. E. Carlson, F. Gross, Phys. Rev. C 23, 363 (1981).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    C. Herberg et al., Eur. Phys. J. A 5, 131 (1999).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    J. Becker et al., Eur. Phys. J. A 6, 329 (1999).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    J. Golak et al., Phys. Rev. C 63, 034006 (2001).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    D. Rohe et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 4257 (1999).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    J. Bermuth, doctoral thesis, Mainz University 2001.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    T. Eden et al., Phys. Rev. C 50, R1749 (1994).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    I. Passchier et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 4988 (1999).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    H. Zhu et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 081801 (2001).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    S. Dieterich et al., Phys. Lett. B 500, 47 (2001).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Damir Bosnar
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Physics, Faculty of ScienceUniversity of ZagrebCroatia

Personalised recommendations