Expectations for Charged Higgs in CMS

  • Ritva Kinnunen
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Physics book series (LNP, volume 616)


Expectations for the production of the heavy charged Higgs in the CMS experiment are discussed in the associated production channel gbtH ± with H ± → τν and H ±tb decay and in the s-channel process q qH ± with the H ± → τν decay. The pptH ± + X, H ± → τν channel with fully hadronic final state is found to be the most promising for the charged Higgs search at LHC. The expected discovery ranges are evaluated for CMS for the integrated luminosity of 30fb -1.


Higgs Boson Higgs Mass Decay Channel Transverse Mass Total Background 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    D. Denegri, V. Drollinger, R. Kinnunen, K. Lassila-Perini, S. Lehti, F. Moortgat, A. Nikitenko, S. Slabospitsky, N. Stepanov, Summary of the CMS Discovery Potential for the MSSM SUSY Higgses, CMS NOTE 2001/032, hep-ph/0112045.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    D.P. Roy, The hadronic Tau decay signature of heavy charged Higgs boson at LHC, Phys. Lett. B459 (1999) 607.ADSGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    S. Banerjee and M. Maity, Search for the Charged Higgs in Top Decays in CMS, CMS NOTE 2000/039.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    T. Sjostrand, Comp.Phys.Comm. 82 (1994) 74; CERN-TH.6488/92; CERNTH.7112/93, S. Mrenna, SPYTHIA, A Supersymmetric Extension of PYTHIA5.7, ANL-HEP-PR-96-63.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    M. Carena, S. Heynemeyer, C.E.M. Wagner and G. Weiglein, Succestions for improved benchmark scenarion for Higgs-boson searches at LEP2, CERN-TH/99-374, DESY 99-186, hep-ph/9909435.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    S. Jadach, Z. Was, R. Decker, M. Jezabek and J.H. Kuhn, CERN-TH-6793, 1992Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    S. Abdullin, A. Khanov and N. Stepanov, CMSJET, CMS TN/94-180.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    CMS Collaboration, The tracker project, Technical Design Report, CERN/LHCC 98-6, CMS TDR 5, 26 February 1998.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    S. Eno, W. Smith, S. Dasu, R. Kinnunen and A. Nikitenko, A Study of a First and Second Level Tau Trigger, CMS NOTE 2000/055.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    D. Kotlinski, A. Nikitenko and R. Kinnunen, Study of a Level-3 Tau Trigger with the Pixel Detector, CMS NOTE 2001/017.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    S. Moretti and D.P. Roy, Detecting heavy charged Higgs bosons at the LHC with triple b-tagging, hep-ph/9909435.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    S. Slabospitsky, CMS NOTE 2002/010, hep-ph-0203094.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    D.E. Groom et al., The European Physical Journal C15, 1 (2000).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    S. Slabospitsky and L. Sonnenschein, CMS NOTE 2002/009, hep-ph-0201292.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    The ALEPH, DELPHI, L3 and OPAL Collaborations, and the LEP HiggsWorking Group, CERN-EP/2001-055 and hep-ex/0107030.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ritva Kinnunen
    • 1
  1. 1.Helsinki Institute of PhysicsHelsinki

Personalised recommendations