Advertisement

Radiatively Induced Conversions of Massive Neutrinos

  • Krešimir Kumerički
  • Ivica Picek
Conference paper
  • 375 Downloads
Part of the Lecture Notes in Physics book series (LNP, volume 616)

Abstract

In the present exciting moment of neutrino physics we have two important pieces of evidence for neutrino conversions: (i) A conversion of νμ dominantly to ντ, from νμ deficit in atmospheric neutrinos [1], with the up/down asymmetry established in νμ induced events; (ii) A conversion of the solar νe into νμ or ντ, inferred by combining SuperKamiokande [1] and SNO [2] data.

Keywords

Massive Neutrino Radiative Correction Neutrino Oscillation Solar Neutrino Atmospheric Neutrino 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Super-Kamiokande, Y. Fukuda et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 1562 (1998), hepex/9807003 Selected Conversions of Massive Neutrinos 129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    SNO, Q. R. Ahmad et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 071301 (2001), nucl-ex/0106015CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Z. Maki, M. Nakagawa, and S. Sakata, Prog. Theor. Phys. 28, 870 (1962)zbMATHCrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    CHOOZ, M. Apollonio et al., Phys. Lett. B466, 415 (1999), hep-ex/9907037Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    F. Boehm et al., Phys. Rev. D64, 112001 (2001), hep-ex/0107009ADSGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    M. Fukugita and M. Tanimoto, Phys. Lett. B515, 30 (2001), hep-ph/0107082ADSGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    H. Murayama, (2002), hep-ph/0201022Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    R. E. Shrock, Phys. Rev. D24, 1275 (1981)ADSGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Q. Ho-Kim, B. Machet, and X. Y. Pham, Eur. Phys. J. C13, 117 (2000), hepph/9902442ADSGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    C. Hagner et al., Phys. Rev. D52, 1343 (1995)ADSGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    J. O. Eeg, K. Kumericki, and I. Picek, Eur. Phys. J. C17, 163 (2000), hepph/9605337CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    J. O. Eeg, K. Kumericki, and I. Picek, Fizika B10, (2002)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    J. O. Eeg, K. Kumericki, and I. Picek, Eur. Phys. J. C1, 531 (1998), hepph/9605337CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    M. B. Voloshin and E. P. Shabalin, Pisma Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 23, 123 (1976)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    N. Asida, A. Niegawa, H. Ozaki, and M. Kubota, (2001), hep-ph/0109227Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    D. Grasso and V. Semikoz, Phys. Rev. D60, 053010 (1999), hep-ph/9808390ADSGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    L. Wolfenstein, Phys. Rev. D17, 2369 (1978)ADSGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    S. P. Mikheev and A. Y. Smirnov, Nuovo Cim. C9, 17 (1986)ADSGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Krešimir Kumerički
    • 1
  • Ivica Picek
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Physics, Faculty of ScienceUniversity of ZagrebZagrebCroatia

Personalised recommendations