The GEO 600 Gravitational Wave Detector Status, Research, Development

  • Albrecht Rüdiger
  • Karsten Danzmann
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Physics book series (LNP, volume 562)


The last few years have brought a great break-through in the quest for earth-bound detection of gravitational waves: at five sites, laser-interferometric detectors, of armlengths from 0.3 to 4 km, are being built. These projects have in common that one prominent noise source, the shot noise, is reduced by the use of power recycling. By using advanced optical technologies early on, the German-British project GEO 600, although only intermediate in size (600 m), has good chances for a competitive sensitivity, at least with the first versions of the larger detectors. Particularly the use of the so-called signal recycling technique will allow to search for faint sources of only slowly varying frequency (pulsars, close binaries). The talk will describe the particular topology of the GEO 600 interferometer, characterized by the use of a four-pass delay line and signal recycling. The major noise sources, and the experimental effort aiming at their reduction, will be discussed. The current status of the construction of GEO 600 will be outlined (civil engineering, vacuum, optics). The research and development activities at the experimental sites (Garching, Glasgow, Hannover) will be given broad emphasis. First science runs of GEO 600, well in time with those of other ground-based interferometers, are expected in the year 2001.


Shot Noise Seismic Noise Test Mass Michelson Interferometer Vacuum Tank 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    B.J. Meers: Phys. Rev. D 38, 2317 (1988).ADSGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    K.A. Strain, B.J. Meers: Phys. Rev. Lett. 66, 1391 (1991).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    S. Rowan et al.: Phys. Lett. A 233, 303 (1997).ADSGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    S. Rowan et al.: Phys. Lett. A 246, 471 (1998).ADSGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    O.S. Brozek et al.: Proc. 18th Moriond Workshop, in press (1999).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    A. Rüdiger et al.: Optica Acta 28, 641 (1981).ADSGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    K. Skeldon et al.: Rev. Sci. Instrum. 67, 2443 (1996).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    D. Schnier et al.: Phys. Lett. A 225, 210 (1997).ADSGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    J. Mizuno et al.: Phys. Lett. A 175, 273 (1993).ADSGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    J. Mizuno et al.: Opt. Comm. 138, 383 (1997).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    J. Mizuno et al.: paper in preparation (1999).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    R. Schilling: Optocad, paper in preparation (1999).Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    G. Heinzel: LISO, available from (1999).
  14. 14.
    G. Heinzel et al.: Automatic beam alignment in the Garching 30-m prototype of a laser-interferometric gravitational wave detector, Opt. Comm. 160, 321 (1999).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    G. Heinzel et al.: Experimental Demonstration of a Suspended Dual Recycling Interferometer, Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 5493 (1998).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    G. Heinzel: Advanced optical techniques for laser-interferometric gravitational-wave detectors, Thesis, Univ. Hannover (1999); available as MPQ243.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Albrecht Rüdiger
    • 1
  • Karsten Danzmann
    • 1
  1. 1.Max-Planck-Institut für QuantenoptikGarching and HannoverGermany

Personalised recommendations