Advertisement

Alternative approaches to population structure

  • Newton E. Morton
Chapter
  • 91 Downloads
Part of the Contemporary Issues in Genetics and Evolution book series (CIGE, volume 4)

Abstract

There are three approaches to DNA identification: tectonic, halieutic and icarian, of which the tectonic is sensible, the halieutic impractical, and the icarian idiotic. The rationale and consequences of these approaches are detailed.

Key words

DNA identification forensic DNA kinship likelihood ratio population structure 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aldhous, P., 1993. Geneticists attack NRC report as cientifically flawed. Science 259: 755 - 756.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Caskey, C.T., 1991. Comments on DNA based forensic analysis. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 49: 893–894.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Chakraborty, R. & K.K. Kidd, 1991. The utility of DNA typing in forensic work. Science 254: 1735 - 1739.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Collins, A. & N.E. Morton, 1994. Likelihood ratios for DNA identification. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 91: 6007–6011.Google Scholar
  5. Committee on DNA Technology in Forensic Science, National Research Council, 1992. DNA Technology in Forensic Science. Nat. Academy Press, Washington.Google Scholar
  6. Cockerham, C.C., 1969. Variance of gene frequencies. Evolution 23: 72 - 84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cotterman, C.W., 1940. A calculus for statico-genetics. Thesis, Ohio State University, Ohio. Reprinted in P. Ballonoff, (ed.), Genetics and Social Structure ( 1974 ). Dowden, Hutchinson, and Ross, Inc., Stroudsburg, Pa.Google Scholar
  8. Devlin, B., N. Risch, & K. Roeder, 1993. Statistical evaluation of DNA fingerprinting: a critique of the NRC’s report. Science 259: 748–749, 837.Google Scholar
  9. Evett, I.W., 1992. Evaluating DNA profiles in a case where the defence is “it was my brother.” J. Forms. Sci. Soc. 32: 5–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Ginther, C., L. Isseltarver & M.C. King, 1992. Identifying individuals by sequencing mitochondrial DNA from teeth. Nature Genet. 2: 135 - 138.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Haldane, J.B.S., 1964. A defense of beanbag genetics. Perspect. Biol. Med., 7: 343–359.Google Scholar
  12. Hardy, G.H., 1908. Mendelian proportions in a mixed population. Science 28: 49 - 50.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kirk, R.L. & Thorne, A.G. 1976. The Origin of the Australians. Humanities Press, New Jersey.Google Scholar
  14. Kullback, S., 1959. Information Theory and Statistics. Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
  15. Lander, E.S., 1991. Research on DNA typing catching up with courtroom application. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 48: 819–823.Google Scholar
  16. Lewontin, R.C., 1972. The apportionment of human diversity. Evol. Biol. 6: 381–398.Google Scholar
  17. Lewontin, R.C. & D.L. Haril, 1991. Population genetics in forensic DNA typing. Science 254: 1745 - 1750.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Malecot, G., 1948. Les mathématiques de l’hérédité. Paris, Masson. Morton, N.E., 1973. Genetic Structure of Populations. University Press, Honolulu.Google Scholar
  19. Morton, N.E. & Keats, 1976. Human microdifferentiation in the Western Pacific. In R.L. Kirk & A.G. Thome (eds.) The origin of the Australians. Human Biol. Series 6, Australian Institute of Aboriginal Studies, Canberra. Humanities Press, NJ.Google Scholar
  20. Morton, N.E., 1992. Genetic structure of forensic populations. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 89: 2556–2560.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Morton, N.E., A. Collins, & I. Balazs, 1993. Kinship bioassay on hypervariable loci in Blacks and Caucasians. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci., USA 90: 1892–1896.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Mourant, A.E., 1954. The Distribution of the Human Blood Groups, Blackwell, Oxford.Google Scholar
  23. Mourant, A.E., A.C. Kopec & K. Domaniewska-Sobczak, 1976. The Distribution of the Human Blood Groups and Other Polymorphisms. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Neyman, J. & E.S. Pearson, 1928. On the use and interpretation of certain test criteria for purposes of statistical inference. Biometrics 20A: 175, 263.Google Scholar
  25. Roychoudhury, A.K. & M. Nei, 1988. Human Polymorphic Genes. World Distribution. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Slimowitz, J.R. & J.E. Cohen, 1993. Violations of the ceiling principle: exact conditions and statistical evidence. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 53: 314–323.Google Scholar
  27. Tills, D., A. Kopec & R.E. Tills, 1983. The Distribution of the Human Blood Groups and Other Polymorphisms. Suppl. 1.Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  28. United States v. Yee (1991). 134 F.R.D. 161 ( N.D. Ohio ).Google Scholar
  29. Wald, A., 1947. Sequential Analysis. Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
  30. Weinberg, W., 1908. Uber den Nachweis der Vererbung beim Menschen. Jahresh Verein f Vaterl Naturk Wurttem 64: 368–382. Eng. trans. in S.H. Boyer (ed.), Papers on Human Genetics ( 1963 ). Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey.Google Scholar
  31. Weir, B.S., 1993. Forensic population genetics and the National Research Council (NRC). Am. J. Hum. Genet. 52: 437–440.Google Scholar
  32. Wooley, J.R., 1991. A response to Lander: The courtroom perspective. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 49: 892–893.Google Scholar
  33. Wright, S., 1921. Systems of mating. Genetics 6: 111 - 178.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Yasuda, N., 1968. An extension of Wahlund’s principle to evaluate mating type frequency. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 20: 1–23.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • Newton E. Morton
    • 1
  1. 1.Human Genetics CentreUniversity of SouthamptonSouthamptonUK

Personalised recommendations