A method for quantifying differentiation between populations at multi-allelic loci and its implications for investigating identity and paternity

  • David J. Balding
  • Richard A. Nichols
Part of the Contemporary Issues in Genetics and Evolution book series (CIGE, volume 4)


A method is proposed for allowing for the effects of population differentiation, and other factors, in forensic inference based on DNA profiles. Much current forensic practice ignores, for example, the effects of coancestry and inappropriate databases and is consequently systematically biased against defendants. Problems with the ‘product rule’ for forensic identification have been highlighted by several authors, but important aspects of the problems are not widely appreciated. This arises in part because the match probability has often been confused with the relative frequency of the profile. Further, the analogous problems in paternity cases have received little attention. The proposed method is derived under general assumptions about the underlying population genetic processes. Probabilities relevant to forensic inference are expressed in terms of a single parameter whose values can be chosen to reflect the specific circumstances. The method is currently used in some UK courts and has important advantages over the ‘Ceiling Principle’ method, which has been criticized on a number of grounds.

Key words

DNA profiles Paternity Wright’s FST coancestry forensic science 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Balding, D.J. and P. Donnelly, 1995. Inference in forensic identification. To appear J. Roy. Statist. Soc. 158.Google Scholar
  2. Balding, D.J. and R.A. Nichols, 1994. DNA profile match probability calculation: how to allow for population stratification, relatedness, database selection and single bands. Forensic Sci. Inter. 64: 125–140.Google Scholar
  3. Cavalli-Sforza, L.L. and A. Piazza, 1993. Human genomic diversity in Europe: a summary of recent research and prospects for the future. Eur. J. Hum. Genet. 1: 3–18.Google Scholar
  4. Chakraborty, R. and K.K. Kidd, 1991. The utility of DNA typing in forensic work. Science 254: 1735–1739.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cockerham, C.C., 1971. Higher order probability functions of identity of alleles by descent. Genetics 69: 235–246.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Crow, J.F. and M. Kimura, 1970. An Introduction to Population Genetics Theory. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
  7. Devlin, B., N. Risch and K. Roeder, 1993. Statistical evaluation of DNA fingerprinting: a critique of the NRC’s report. Science 259: 748, 749, 837.Google Scholar
  8. Donnelly, P., 1995. The non-independence of matches at different loci in DNA profiles: quantifying the effect of close relatives on the match probability. (to appear) Heredity.Google Scholar
  9. Ewens, W.J., 1979. Mathematical Population Genetics. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
  10. Geisser, S. and W. Johnson, 1993. Testing independence of fragment lengths within VNTR loci. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 53: 1103–1106.Google Scholar
  11. Harding, R.M., 1992. VNTRs in review. Evol. Anthrop. 1: 62–71.Google Scholar
  12. Jeffreys, A.I., N.J. Royale, V. Wilson and Z. Wong, 1988. Spontaneous mutation rates to new alleles at tandem repetitive hypervariable loci in human DNA. Nature 332: 278–281.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Jeffreys, A.J., K. Tamaki, A. MacLeod, D.G. Monckton, D.L. Neil and J.A.L. Armour, 1994. Complex gene conversion events in germline mutation at human minisatellites. Nature Genetics 6: 136–145.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Krane, D.E., R.W. Allen, S.A. Sawyer, D.A. Petrov and D.L. Hard, 1992. Genetic differences at four DNA typing loci in Finnish, Italian and mixed Caucasian populations. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 89: 10583–10587.Google Scholar
  15. Lempert, R., 1991. Some caveats concerning DNA as criminal identification evidence: with thanks to the Reverend Bayes. Cardozo Law Rev. 13: 303–341.Google Scholar
  16. Lewontin, R.C. and D.L. Hartl, 1991. Population genetics in forensic DNA typing. Science 254: 1745–1750.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lindley, D.V., 1990. The present position in Bayesian statistics. Statist. Sci. 5: 44–89.Google Scholar
  18. Morton, N.E., 1992. Genetic structure of forensic populations. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 89: 2556–2560.Google Scholar
  19. Morton, N.E., 1993a. DNA in court. Eur. J. Hum. Genet. 1: 172–178.Google Scholar
  20. Morton, N.E., 1993b. Kinship bioassay on hypervariable loci in blacks and caucasians. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 90: 1892–1896.Google Scholar
  21. Nichols, R.A. and D.J. Balding, 1991. Effects of population structure on DNA fingerprint analysis in forensic science. Heredity 66: 297–302.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Robertson, B. and T. Vignaux, 1992. Why the NRC report on DNA is wrong. New Law J.: 1619–1621.Google Scholar
  23. Roeder, K., 1994. DNA fingerprinting: a review of the controversy. Statist. Sci. 9: 222–278.Google Scholar
  24. Wall, W.J., R. Williamson, M. Petrou, D. Papaioannou and B.H. Parkin, 1993. Variation of short tandem repeats within and between populations. Hum. Molec. Genet. 2: 1023–1029.Google Scholar
  25. Waye, J.S. and B. Eng, 1994. Allelic stability of a VNTR locus 3’aHVR: Linkage disequilibrium with the common athalassaemia-1 deletion of South-East Asia (-SEA/). Hum. Heredity 44: 61–67.Google Scholar
  26. Weir, B.S., 1993a. Forensic Population Genetics and the National Research Council (NRC). Am. J. Hum. Genet. 52: 437–440.Google Scholar
  27. Weir, B.S., 1993b. Independence tests for VNTR alleles defined as quantile bins. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 53: 1107–1113.Google Scholar
  28. Yasuda, N., 1968. An extension of Wahlund’s principle to evaluate mating type frequency. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 20: 1–23.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • David J. Balding
    • 1
  • Richard A. Nichols
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Mathematical Sciences and School of Biological Sciences, Queen Mary & Westfield CollegeUniversity of LondonLondonUK

Personalised recommendations