Advertisement

Different Methods for the Protection of Cultural Landscapes

The Example of an Early Industrial Landscape in the Veluwe Region, the Netherlands
  • Johannes Renes
Chapter

Abstract

In most countries in Europe and Northern America, since the end of the 19th century a growing number of buildings and archaeological objects have been designated as cultural heritage and they are protected as such. Protection of larger areas started also during the end of the 19th century. In this case, the initiative usually came from nature protection quarters. Many of the oldest National Parks are designated mainly for their ecological values. In the course of the 20th century, the interest in cultural landscapes grew. on the one hand, protection of buildings and archaeological sites often proved unsatisfactory when these objects became disparate from their fast changing surrounding landscapes. on the other hand, ecologists realised that most of the landscapes they wanted to protect, were in fact the result of centuries-long human influence. During the second half of the 20th century, protection of cultural landscapes became part of the political agenda in a number of countries. In some countries — most prominently in the United Kingdom — cultural landscapes, including living agrarian landscapes, were designated as national parks. Most of these protected landscapes are situated in regions which are marginal for agriculture, and national park status is often seen as a means to attract tourists and subsidies.

Keywords

Archaeological Site Legal Protection Cultural Landscape Potential Partner Water Board 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aitchison, J. (1995). Cultural Landscapes in Europe: a Geographical Perspective. In B. von Droste, H. Plachter & M. Rössler (Eds.), Cultural Landscapes of Universal Value (pp. 272–288). Jena/Stuttgart/New York: Fischer.Google Scholar
  2. Grenville, J. (1999). Managing the Historic Rural Landscape. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  3. Hagens, H. (2000). Op kracht van stromend water; negen eeuwen watermolens op de Veluwe. Hengelo: Smit.Google Scholar
  4. Harteisen, U., A. Schmidt & M. Wulf (Eds.) (2000). Kulturlandschaftsforschung und Umweltplanung. Fachtagung an der Fachhochschule Hildesheim/Holzminden/Göttingen am 9.–10. November 2000 in Göttingen. Herdecke: CGA.Google Scholar
  5. Renes, J. (2002). Beken in kaart; een vroege topologische kaart van de sprengenbeken bij Vaassen. Historisch-Geografisch Tijdschrift, 20, 120–124.Google Scholar
  6. Renes, J., Meijer, J. & de Poel K.R. (2002). Het Veluwse sprengenlandschap; een cultuurmonument. Wageningen: Alterra.Google Scholar
  7. Voorn, H., Hollestelle, J. & Cornelissen de Beer, G.D. (1985). De papiermolens in de provincie Gelderland, alsmede in Overijssel en Limburg. Ver. van Ned. Papier — en Kartonfabrieken. De geschiedenis der Nederlandse papierindustrie 3. Haarlem.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Johannes Renes
    • 1
  1. 1.Faculty of GeosciencesUtrecht UniversityThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations