Management Strategies in Forest Landscapes in Norway

  • Terje Skjeggedal
  • Tor Arnesen
  • Guri Markhus
  • Per Gustav Thingstad


The main purpose of this work is to present some views on the management of landscape change in forest landscapes from the perspectives of ecological integrity and management regimes, using a transdisciplinary approach. This gives us an opportunity to describe the practice of various management regimes and discuss future management strategies. the presentation is based on the project The Battlefield of Regimes, financially supported by the Research Council of Norway (Skjeggedal 2001; Skjeggedal et al. 2001). This project is mainly concerned with the management of landscape change in forested areas in an ecological perspective.


Forest Owner Management Regime Landscape Change Forest Landscape Ecological Integrity 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Andreasen, J.K, O’Neil, R.V., Noss, R. & Slosser, N.C. (2001). Considerations for the Development of a Terrestrial Index of Ecological Integrity. Ecological Indicators, 1, 21–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Angelstam, P. (1992). Conservation of Communities — the Importance of Edges, Surroundings and Landscape Mosaic Structure. In L. Hansson (Ed.), Ecological Principles of Nature Conservation. London: Elsevier Applied Science.Google Scholar
  3. Andrén, H. (1994). Effects on Habitat Fragmentation on Birds and Mammals in Landscapes with Different Proportions of Suitable Habitat: a Review. Oikos, 71, 355–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Andrén, H. (1997). Habitat Fragmentation and Changes in Biodiversity. Ecological Bulletin, 46, 171–181.Google Scholar
  5. Brooker, L. (2002). the Application of Focal Species Knowledge to Landscape Design in Agricultural Lands Using the Ecological Neighbourhood as a Template. Landscape and Urban Planning, 60, 185–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Crossley, J.W. (1996). Managing Ecosystems for Integrity: Theoretical Considerations for Resource and Environmental Managers. Society and Natural Resources, 9, 465–481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dramstad, W.E., Fjellheim, W.J., Skar, B., Helliksen, W., Sollund, M.L.B., Tveit, M.S., Geelmuyden, A.K. & Framstad, E. (2001). Integrating Landscape-Based Values — Norwegian Monitoring of Agricultural Landscapes. Landscape and Urban Planning, 57, 257–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Edenius, L. & Sjöberg, K. (1997). Distribution of Birds in Natural Landscape Mosaics of Old-Growth Forest in Northern Sweden: Relations to Habitat Area and Landscape Context. Ecography, 20, 425–431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Farina, A. (1997). Principles and Methods in Landscape Ecology. London: Chapman & Hall Ltd.Google Scholar
  10. Flyvbjerg, B. (1991). Rationalitet og makt. Bind 1. Det konkretes vitenskap. København: Akademisk forlag.Google Scholar
  11. Forman, R.T.T. (1995). Land Mosaics. the Ecology of Landscapes and Regions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Fry, G.L.A. (2001). Multifunctional Landscapes — Towards Transdisciplinary Research. Landscape and Urban Planning, 57, (3–4), 159–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Healy, P. (1997). Collaborative Planning. Shaping Places in Fragmented Societies. Basingstoke: Macmillan Press Ltd.Google Scholar
  14. Kay, J.J. & Regier, H. (2000). Uncertainty, Complexity, and Ecological Integrity: Insights from an Ecosystem Approach. In P. Crabbe, A. Holland, L. Ryszowski & L. Westra (Eds.), Implementing Ecological Integrity: Restoring Regional and Global Environmental and Human Health. Kluver, NATO Science Series, Environmental Security, 121–156.Google Scholar
  15. Leitäo, A.B. & Ahern, J. (2001). Applying Landscape Ecological Concepts and Metrics in Sustainable Landscape Planning. Landscape and Urban Planning, 59, 65–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Levende Skog (1998). Standardutredninger fra Levende Skog. Levende Skog. Oslo.Google Scholar
  17. Lahti, D.C. (2001). the “Edge Effect on Nest Predation” Hypothesis after Twenty Years. Biological Conservation, 99, 365–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. McCollin, D. (1998). Forest Edges and Habitat Selection in Birds: a Functional Approach. Ecography, 21, 247–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. McGarigal, K., Romme, W.H., Christ, M. & Roworth, E. (2001). Cumulative Effects of Roads and Logging on Landscape Structure in the San Juan Mountains, Colorado (USA). Landscape Ecology 16, 327–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Munn, R.E. (1993). Monitoring for Ecosystem Integrity. In S. Woodley, J. Kay & G. Francis (Eds.), Ecological Integrity and the Management of Ecosystems (pp. 105–115). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Parks Canada Agency (2000). “Unimpaired for Future Generations?” Protecting Ecological Integrity with Canada’s National Parks. Report of the Panel on the Ecological Integrity of Canada’s National Parks. Ottawa.Google Scholar
  22. Regier, H.A. (1993). the Notion of Natural and Cultural Integrity. In S. Woodley, J. Kay & G. Francis (Eds.), Ecological Integrity and the Management of Ecosystems (pp. 3–18). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Reid, W.V. (1996). Beyond Protected Areas: Changing Perceptions of Ecological Management Objectives. In R.C. Scaro & D.W. Johnsen (Eds.), Biodiversity in Managed Landscapes. Theory and Practice (pp. 442–453). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Sanderson, E.W., Redford, K.H., Vedder, A., Coppolillo, P.B. & Ward, S.E. (2002). A Conceptual Model for Conservation Planning Based on Landscape Species Requirements. Landscape and Urban Planning, 58, 41–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Sevatdal, H. (1999). Real Estate Planning; An Applied Academic Aubject. Kart og Plan, 59, 258–266.Google Scholar
  26. Skjeggedal, T. (2001). Landscape Management Between Developed and Protected Areas. In Ü. Mander, A. Printsmann & H. Palang (Eds.), IALE European Conference 2001. Development of European Landscapes. Conference Proceedings (pp. 494–498). Volume II. Publications Instituti Geographici Universitatis Tartuensis, 92.Google Scholar
  27. Skjeggedal, T., Arnesen, T., Markhus, G., Saglie, I.-L. & Thingstad, P.G. (2001). Regimenes slagmark. Om arealutnytting og forvaltningsregimer i LNF-områder. NTF-rapport 2001: 3. Nord-Trondelagsforskning. Steinkjer.Google Scholar
  28. Stone, C.N. (1989). Regime Politics. Kansas: University Press of Kansas.Google Scholar
  29. Thingstad, P.G., Skjeggedal, T. & Markhus, G. (2003). Human-Induced Alteration of Two Boreal Forest Landscape in Central Norway, and Some Possible Consequences for Avian Fauna. Journal of Nature Conservation, 11, 145–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Väisänen, RA., Järvinen, O. & Rauhala, P. (1986). How are Extensive, Human-Caused Habitat Alternations Expressed on the Scale of Local Bird Populations in Boreal Forests? Omis Scandinavia, 17, 282–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Westra, L. & J. Lemons (Eds.) (1995). Perspectives on Ecological Integrity. London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  32. Woodley, S., Kay, J. & Francis, G. (Eds.) (1993). Ecological Integrity and the Management of Ecosystems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  33. Yin, R.K. (1994). Case Study Research. Design and Methods. 2nd Ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, Inc.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Terje Skjeggedal
    • 1
  • Tor Arnesen
    • 2
  • Guri Markhus
    • 3
  • Per Gustav Thingstad
    • 4
  1. 1.Nord-Trondelag Research InstituteNorway
  2. 2.Eastern Norway Research InstituteNorway
  3. 3.Faculty of Social Sciences and Natural ResourcesNord-Trøndelag University CollegeNorway
  4. 4.Museum of Natural History and ArchaeologyNorwegian University of Science and TechnologyNorway

Personalised recommendations