Advertisement

The Effects

Chapter
  • 714 Downloads

Abstract

The preceding chapter dealt with two factors that are decisive for a politi- cal economy moving to the right side of the continuum. In both cases, the market is assumed to be the most efficient instrument for the pursuit of individual wealth. It is with a certain euphoria that Western political leaders claim the success of this market.

Keywords

Poverty Line Private Security Unemployed People Gated Community Corporate Business 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

Chapter 4

  1. 1.
    The term is used by Todaro, in: Bronk, R.: Progress and the Invisible Hand: The Philosophy and Economics of Human Advance, London, 1998, p. 118.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Burton-Jones, A: Knowledge Capitalism, Oxford University Press, 1999, p. 52.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Filer, R. K., et al.: The Economics of Work and Pay, sixth edition, Harper Collins, 1996, p. 71.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Fukuyama, F.: The Great Disruption: Human Nature and the Reconstruction of Social Order (Dutch Translation), Amsterdam/Antwerpen, 1999, pp. 73 and 77.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    For instance: (1) Galbraith, J. K.: The Culture of Contentment, London, 1992; (2) Hutton,W.: The State We’re In, London, 1995; (3) Peterson, W.G.: The Silent Depression:Twenty-Five Years of Wage Squeeze and Middle Class Decline, New York, 1995; (4) Reich, R. B.: The Work of Nations: A Blueprint for the Future, London, 1993; (5) United Nations Research Institute for Social Development: States of Disarray: The Social Effects of Globalisation, London, 1995.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Etzioni, A.: The Spirit of Community. Rights, Responsibilities and the Communitarian Agenda, London, 1995, p. 5.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hertsgaard, M.: ibid., p. 139.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hertsgaard, M.: ibid., p. 147.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kelly, C. M.: ibid., chapter 12.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Moore, M.: Stupid White Men, ibid., p. 81.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lasch, C.: ibid., pp. 31–32.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Phillips, K.: ibid., p. 129.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Phillips, K.: ibid., p. 114. Government retreat from progressive taxation is not limited to the United States. In OECD countries, top tax brackets fell from an average of 52% in 1985 to 42% in 1990 (Scholte, J. A.: ibid., p. 240).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Phillips, K.: ibid., p. 111.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Phillips, K.: ibid., p. xviii.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Etzioni, A.: The New Golden Rule: Community and Morality in a Democratic Society, London, 1997, p. 81.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    A term used by Harrod, R. F., in: Bronk, R.: ibid., p. 172.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    A few years ago, over 28 million Americans (that is, more than 10% of the population) lived in “privately guarded buildings or housing departments” (Gray, J.: False Dawn: The Delusions of Global Capitalism, London, 1999).Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kaplan, R. D.: The Coming Anarchy: Shattering the Dreams of the Cold War, Random House, New York, 2000, p. 83. In 1970, the United States had more public police officers than private security guards. Now the ratio of private guards to public police officers is 3:1 (Reich, R. B.: The Future of Success, ibid., p. 201). As a result, private security in the United States was among the top-ten service businesses, with a turnover of more than $100 billion some years ago (Rifkin, J.: The End of Work: The Decline of the Global Labor Force and the Dawn of the Post-Market Era, New York, 1995, p. 213).Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Rifkin, J.: The European Dream, ibid., p. 194.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Lasch, C.: ibid., p. 56.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Lasch, C.: ibid., p. 176.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Hutton, W.: The World We’re In, ibid., p. 153.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Leadbeater, C.: ibid., p. 27.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    In 1990, the New Jersey legislature went along with them (Reich, R. B.: The Future of Success, ibid., p. 199).Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Kelly, C. M.: ibid., p. 205.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Hutton, W.: The World We’re In, ibid., p. 116.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Moore, M.: Downsize This, ibid., p. 141.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Kelly, C. M.: ibid., p. 168; Klein, N.: Fences and Windows, ibid., p. XXIII.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Forrester, V.: Une étrange Dictature: ibid., p. 70.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Hertz, N.: ibid., p. 58. Apparently, to these epsilons also belong airplane pilots. In this respect, Moore reveals that the starting salary at American Eagle, an American airline, is no more than $16,800 per year. One of those pilots even had to ask for food stamps (Moore, M.: Stupid White Men, ibid., pp. 75–76).Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Hertz, N.: ibid., p. 59. This is in line with the 1998 Human Development Report of the United Nations, which uses a figure of 19,1% (Forrester,V.: Une étrange Dictature, ibid., p. 64).Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Among the latter, were around 850,000 men between 25 and 54 years old who in 1996 lost their jobs but were not looking for a new one for reasons of depression, pride or of inflexibility (Phillips, K.: ibid., p. 164).Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Phillips, K.: ibid., p. 345.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Moore, M.: Stupid White Men, ibid., p. 77.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Forrester, V.: Une étrange Dictature: ibid., p. 63.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Kelly, C. M.: ibid., chapter 10.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Frank, R. H. and Cook, Ph. J: The Winner-Take-All Society: Why the Few at the Top Get So Much More than the Rest of Us, New York, 1995.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Phillips, K.: ibid., p. 133.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Reich, R. B.: The Future of Success, ibid., p. 102.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Luttwak, E.: Turbo Capitalism: Winners and Losers in the Global Economy, London, 1998, p. 60.Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Hutton, W.: The World We’re In, ibid., p. 26.Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Phillips, K.: ibid., p. 133.Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Phillips, K.: ibid., p. 221.Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Phillips, K.: ibid., p. 133.Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Hertsgaard, M.: ibid., p. 138.Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Phillips, K.: ibid., pp. 134–135.Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Hutton, W.: The World We’re In, ibid., p. 25.Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Gates, J.: ibid., p. 22.Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Hertsgaard, M.: ibid., p. 41.Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Phillips, K.: ibid., p. 113.Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    A similar picture results from reading Shipler’s The Working Poor (Shipler, D. K.: The Working Poor: Invisible in America, Alfred A. Knopf, New York, 2004).Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Hertsgaard, M.: ibid., p. 137.Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Ehrenreich, B.: Nickel and Dimes: Undercover in Low-Wage USA, Granta Books, 2002. Similarly reprehensible circumstances can be found in, for instance, the three giant American meatpackers ConAgra, IBP and Excel. If one reads Schlosser’s account in this respect, one’s stomach turns (Schlosser, E.: ibid.).Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    Gates, J.: ibid., p. 115.Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    Reich, R. B.: The Future of Success, ibid., p. 120.Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    Ehrenreich, B.: ibid., p. 219.Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    De Volkskrant, 7 January 2003.Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    Moore, M.: Stupid White Men, ibid., p. 223.Google Scholar
  60. 60.
    Castells, M.: End of Millennium, ibid., p. 150.Google Scholar
  61. 61.
    Moore, M.: Stupid White Men, ibid., p. 113.Google Scholar
  62. 62.
    Barber, B. R.: Fear’s Empire, ibid., p. 210.Google Scholar
  63. 63.
    Moore, M.: Stupid White Men, ibid., p. 211.Google Scholar
  64. 64.
    De Telegraaf, 11 August 2003.Google Scholar
  65. 65.
    De Volkskrant, 26 August 2003.Google Scholar
  66. 66.
    Mittelman, J. H.: ibid., p. 88. The latter implies that current globalization is creating a Fourth World, a term that is meant to identify those who are excluded from participation in the new global economy (Castells, M.: End of Millennium, ibid., p. 150). One can find these people in the big cities of the developed world and in the shanty towns of the world’s mega-cities, which are populated “by millions of homeless, incarcerated, prostituted, criminalized, brutalized, stigmatized, sick and illiterate persons” (Castells, M.: End of Millennium, ibid., pp. 164–165). It should be taken into account that, apart from the loss of income, unemployment can also result in far-reaching consequences like psychological damage, loss of self-confidence and skills, increasing inequalities in health, disrupted family relations and social exclusion (Sen, A.: ibid., p. 96). This may explain disturbing facts about American society, like a tripling in the number of suicides since 1960 among youngsters between 15 and 24 years of age, more than 65 million official antidepressant prescriptions in 1998 alone, and the one in six children who take stimulants and antidepressants (Gates, J.: ibid., p. 55).Google Scholar
  67. 67.
    Kuttner, R.: Everything for Sale, ibid., p. 74.Google Scholar
  68. 68.
    Kuttner, R.: Everything for Sale, ibid., p. 77.Google Scholar
  69. 69.
    Phillips, K.: ibid., p. 151.Google Scholar
  70. 70.
    Sennett, R.: The Corrosion of Character: The Personal Consequences of Work in the New Millennium, Norton and Company, 1998, p. 49. This corresponds with Hutton, who presents a figure of 39 million Americans who were caught up in corporate downsizing between 1980 and 1995 (Hutton, W.: The World We’re In, ibid., p. 164). And this was not the end. In 1995, AT&T, General Motors and Boeing fired 30%, 29%, and 37% of their employees respectively (NRC/Handelsblad, 5 March 1996). In December 1998, Boeing announced further redundancies of 48,000 employees over the next two years; in June 1999, Proctor and Gamble announced that they would close down ten factories, leaving 15,000 people unemployed; and Citigroup did so for over 10,000 people (Forrester, V.: Une étrange Dictature: ibid., pp. 60–61).Google Scholar
  71. 71.
    Saul, J. R.: The Unconscious Civilization, Penguin Books, 1997, p. 108.Google Scholar
  72. 72.
    Some of them even have their pictures on the cover of a national American weekly (Reich, R. B.: The Future of Success, ibid., p. 83).Google Scholar
  73. 73.
    Hutton, W.: The World We’re In, ibid., p. 124. The author refers to an intriguing study showing, unexpectedly, that “high CEO pay tends to be followed by weak rather than strong share price performance; between 1993 and 2000 the majority of companies headed by the ten highest-paid CEOs underperformed the stock market average over both one year and three years afterwards” (p. 135).Google Scholar
  74. 74.
    Hammer and Champy defend reengineering by arguing that it is directed at “doing more with less,” whereas downsizing and restructuring mean “doing less with less”. In: Sennett, R.: ibid., p. 49.Google Scholar
  75. 75.
    Reich, R. B.: The Future of Success, ibid., p. 70.Google Scholar
  76. 76.
    Gates, J.: ibid., p. 54. What all this downsizing does not take into account is the negative influence it has on the motivation and morale of the workers who have not (yet) become its victims. In this respect, research by the American Management Association shows that repeated downsizing produces “lower profits and declining worker productivity,” whereas a study by the Wyatt Companies found that, of companies engaged in downsizing, “less than half [...] achieved their expense reduction goals; fewer than one-third increased profitability and less than one in four increased productivity” (Sennett, R.: ibid., p. 50).Google Scholar
  77. 77.
    An example, in this respect, is Dunlap who, after two years of downsizing, walked away with nearly $100 million in salary, bonus, stock gains, et cetera (Kelly, C. M.: ibid., p. 103). This, however, is nothing compared to the CEOs of Coca Cola and Disney, who walked away with over $1 billion in stock grants or equity raids (Gates, J.: ibid., p. 140). Regarding this phenomenon, based on a study of 22 companies that announced large lay-offs in 1994, Downs found a strong correlation (.31) between the size of the lay-off and the compensation of the CEOs (Phillips, K.: ibid., p. 151; Kelly, C. M.: ibid., p. 128). Supportive in this respect was that Wall Street institutional investors had calculated that “a single lay-off added $60,000 to future-year bottom-line earnings” (Phillips, K.: ibid., p. 150).Google Scholar
  78. 78.
    Beck, U.: ibid., p. 5.Google Scholar
  79. 79.
    Zakaria, F.: ibid.: p. 214.Google Scholar
  80. 80.
    Stiglitz, J.: The Roaring Nineties, ibid.: p. 100.Google Scholar
  81. 81.
    In this respect, it is important to mention the conflicts of interest for accountants who, on the one hand, did the auditing and, on the other hand, performed as management consultants. The latter job appears to have been very rewarding. The American corporation Tyco, for example, paid Pricewaterhouse Coopers $13.2 million in auditing fees in 2001, but nearly $38 million for consulting services. Similarly, in 2001, Motorola paid KPMG $3.9 million for auditing and $62.3 million for other services. Ernst and Young received $2.5 million for auditing Sprint, supplemented with $63.8 million for consulting services (Huffington, A.: ibid., p. 187).Google Scholar
  82. 82.
    In this respect, an investigation at PricewaterhouseCoopers undertaken by the SEC in 1998 exposed 8,000 cases of PWC executives’ making investments in companies they audited (Huffington, A.: ibid., p. 192).Google Scholar
  83. 83.
    Phillips, K.: ibid., p. 153.Google Scholar
  84. 84.
    De Volkskrant, 29 April 2003, p. 17. Although American CEOs receive remuneration beyond human imagination, apparently it is never enough. In this respect, Petras and Petras present a list of 25 examples of CEO greed—all purchases for personal use, but paid for by the corporations that employ them (Petras, K. and Petras, R.: Unusually Stupid Americans: A Compendium of All-American Stupidity, Villard, New York, 2003, pp. 145–147).Google Scholar
  85. 85.
    Wheen, F.: ibid., p. 273.Google Scholar
  86. 86.
    Petras, K. and Petras, R.: ibid., p. 150.Google Scholar
  87. 87.
    Moore, M.: Downsize This, ibid., p. 109. To Levitt, a former Chairman of the American Securities and Exchange Commission, stock options represented some 80% of management compensation in 2001, and these increased in value from $60 billion to $600 billion during the 1990s (Hutton, W.: The World We’re In, ibid., p. 124), thus creating an environment that rewarded executives for managing the share prices instead of the business.They also were an incentive to use accounting tricks, with help of external auditors, to boost the share price on which their compensation depended. Therefore, Levitt concludes that stock options “have created perverse incentives to keep the share price high, even if it means falsifying the numbers” (Levitt, A.: Take on the Street: What Wall Street and Corporate America Don’t Want You to Know; What You Can Do to Fight Back, Pantheon Books, 2002, p. 252). and the numbers were falsified on many occasions, caused by the fact that often the auditors were in a conflict of interests. Consequently, stock options made corporate earnings look a lot better than they really were. In this respect, researchers of the American Federal Reserve found that, between 1995 and 2000, the average growth in earnings of the companies in Standard & Poor’s 500 index would have been 9.4% instead of 12% had they expensed stock options (Levitt, A.: ibid., p. 111).Google Scholar
  88. 88.
    Forrester, V.: L’horreur économique (Dutch Translation), AMBO/Amsterdam, 1997, p. 141–142. This type of “work” has to be distinguished from workers who are placed “on call” during their days off. Workers who are employed this way are quizzed about their whereabouts 24 hours a day, which is very intrusive in one’s personal life (Pilger, J.: Hidden Agendas, ibid., p. 345).Google Scholar
  89. 89.
    Frank Field, Minister for Social Security in the 1980s, once counted 30 different revisions of the unemployment level in the United Kingdom, of which 29 resulted in a lower official unemployment figure (Frank, S.: ibid., p. 140).Google Scholar
  90. 91.
    Benzeval, M., et al. (eds.): Tackling Inequalities in Health: An Agenda for Action, King’s Fund, London, 1995, p. 132.Google Scholar
  91. 92.
    Pilger, J.: Hidden Agendas: ibid., p. 104.Google Scholar
  92. 93.
    Gates, J.: ibid., p. 48. The 1997 UN Human Development Report observes that, since the early 1980s, the number of Britons in “income poverty” increased by 60% during Thatcher’s government. Meanwhile, an investigation by the House of Commons showed that infant mortality for the rich in the United Kingdom was 4.3 per 1,000 in 1997, compared to 18.5 per 1,000 for the poor. In addition to this, around the same time, the spokesperson on health for the British Medical Association revealed that suicide had become “the big new killer of men,” as it had doubled over the past ten years with, presumably, uncertainty at work being the major cause (Pilger, J.: Hidden Agendas, ibid., p. 80).Google Scholar
  93. 94.
    Abrams, F.: Below the Breadline: Living on the Minimum Wage, Profile Books, 2002, p. 169.Google Scholar
  94. 95.
    Abrams, F.: ibid., p. 183. Despite the minimum wage, 3.5 million working families live in poverty, although the official statistics try to juggle this figure. In addition to this, employers appear to be able to evade the minimum wage regulations with hardly any consequences. Two years after the introduction of the minimum wage, research by the Inland Revenue revealed that out of 6,400 complaints, 3,200 employers were not complying. This resulted, however, in only 349 enforcement notices and 62 penalty notices (Abrams, F.: ibid., pp. 165–184).Google Scholar
  95. 96.
    Pilger, J: Hidden Agendas, ibid., p. 80.Google Scholar
  96. 97.
    Pilger, J.: Hidden Agendas, ibid., p. 89. By 2001, representing an exception in Europe as a whole, around 2,000 of these ordinary British people were sent to prison annually because they could not pay their debt to the state (Cameron, S.: The Cheating Classes: How Britain’s Elite Abuse their Power, Simon and Schuster, 2002, pp. 169 and 181).Google Scholar
  97. 98.
    Pilger, J.: Hidden Agendas, ibid., p. 91.Google Scholar
  98. 99.
    De Volkskrant, 29 July 2003. As an example, the chairman of steel producer Chorus saw his yearly pay more than double to over £550,000 at the end of the millennium, despite the fact that the company experienced a loss of £462 million (Cameron, S.: ibid., p. 211). Also see: Scambler, G.: ibid., pp. 102–103.Google Scholar
  99. 100.
    Forrester, V.: Une étrange Dictature (Dutch Translation): ibid., pp. 64–66.Google Scholar
  100. 101.
    Forrester, V.: Une étrange Dictature (Dutch Translation): ibid., p. 82.Google Scholar
  101. 102.
    Beck, U.: ibid., pp. 152–153.Google Scholar
  102. 103.
    Hoogerwerf, A.: Politiek als Evenwichtskunst, Alphen a/d/ Rijn, 1995.Google Scholar
  103. 104.
    Vries, B. de: ibid., pp. 208, 224–225.Google Scholar
  104. 107.
    Regarding private security, for instance, the number of state police staff in the Netherlands remained the same over the period 1990–1998, whereas private security increased by around 50% (Berenschot BV: Beelden van Bestuur: Berenschot Trendstudie, uitgeverij Lemma, 2002, p. 66).Google Scholar
  105. 108.
    Regarding this, Forrester gives figures of between 50,000 and 60,000 for the final two months of 1998, followed by 11,000 in July 1999 as a result of the merger between Axa and Rhone-Poulenc, 4,200 resulting from the merger between Elf and Totalfina, and 10,000 with Ericsson in Sweden (Forrester, V.: Une étrange Dictature: ibid., pp. 60–61).Google Scholar
  106. 109.
    To give an example; on September 9, 1999, Michelin announced a 17% increase in profits over the first half-year, while at the same time announcing that 7,500 employees would be fired in the next three years. On the same day, the value of Michelin’s shares increased by 10.56%, followed by a further increase of 12.53% two days later (Forrester, V.: Une étrange Dictature: ibid., p. 103). Exactly the same thing happened in Germany in 1995 when the Deutsche Bank announced the elimination of more than 10,000 jobs, while at the same time announcing that profits over the first half year were $1.75 billion (Thurow, L.: The Future of Capitalism, London, 1996, p. 28). In 2000, Unilever announced the staggered redundancy of 25,000 employees over the next five years. Ericsson revealed in April 2002 that another 20,000 employees would be fired, and FIAT announced the layoff of 8,100 workers in October 2002 (De Telegraaf, 10 October 2002).Google Scholar
  107. 110.
    Reich, R. B.: The Future of Success, ibid., p. 81. According to an estimation by the United Nations, the world labor pool of 2.8 billion people in the early 1990s included 800 million unemployed, of whom 120 million were officially registered as such, and over 700 million underemployed (Scholte J. A.: Globalization: A Critical Introduction, ibid., p. 219).Google Scholar
  108. 111.
    According to Wrist, “intellectual capital will go where it is wanted and it will stay where it is well treated” (Frank, R. H. and Cook, Ph. J.: ibid., p. 28).Google Scholar
  109. 113.
    Regarding this, see: Stephen, John D.: The Scandinavian Welfare States: Achievements, Crisis and Prospects, in: Esping-Anderson, G., (ed.): Welfare States in Transition: National Adaptations in Global Economics, London, 1997, p. 57.Google Scholar
  110. 114.
    Research by Shaiken, for instance, shows that the productivity of workers in Mexico in the maquiladoras trading zones along the American border, employed by the American automobile industry and Japanese consumer electronics manufacturers, was not lower than that of their colleagues in the United States and Japan. Their wages, however, were only a fraction of those paid in the United States and Japan for the same job (Castells, M.: The Rise of the Network Society, ibid., p. 128). Meanwhile, there were 1,938 maquiladora factories, employing 400,000 Mexicans in 1990 (Mittelman, J. H.: ibid., p. 42). In 2000, this number had increased to 3,600 factories employing 1,300,000 people, of which 68% were women (Reich, R. B.: The Future of Success, ibid., p. 77). Total exports in electrical and electronic goods, clothes, car parts, and accessories amounts to $80 billion annually, of which $18 billion is Mexican added value (Legrain, Ph.: ibid., p. 321). In this respect, it should be mentioned that Mexico, in exchange for American financial support and partnership in NAFTA, was forced to adopt the neo-liberal economic ideas of the Chicago School of Economics. Consequently, a whole range of liberalizing reforms were carried out, including reductions in taxation and public spending as well as privatization, the latter meaning that, between 1982 and 1991, around 75% of state-owned companies were sold (Fukuyama, F.: The End of History and the Last Man, ibid., p. 131).Google Scholar
  111. 116.
    Juhn and Murphy, for instance, conclude that the growth percentage of the total demand for labor has not changed considerably since the 1940s. What did change is that the demand for labor is concentrated at the level of highly-skilled workers (Miles, J.: When Markets Fail: Social Welfare in Canada and the United States, in: Esping-Anderson, G., (ed.): ibid., p. 133).Google Scholar
  112. 117.
    Friedman, Th. L.: ibid., p. 51.Google Scholar
  113. 118.
    Reich, R. B.: The Future of Success, ibid., p. 77.Google Scholar
  114. 119.
    Phillips, K.: ibid., p. 270.Google Scholar
  115. 120.
    Reich, R. B.: The Future of Success, ibid., p. 77. An example is Wipro, India’s biggest software-services Company, with 50 of America’s 500 top companies among its clients, which was valued at $6 billion in 2000 with pre-tax profits of 7.7 billion rupees (Legrain, Ph.: ibid., pp. 76–77). Also, because of the democratization of technology, in 15 years Thailand became the world’s second largest producer of pickup trucks and the fourth-largest maker of motorcycles (Friedman, Th. L.: ibid., p. 51).Google Scholar
  116. 121.
    Kelly, C. M.: ibid., p. 79.Google Scholar
  117. 122.
    To illustrate: the multinational Philips recently announced that it plans to relocate its R&D activities to China (De Telegraaf, 20 December 2002). A further worrying aspect in this ongoing process of globalization is economic and industrial espionage, as well as bribery and piracy. Regarding this, the American International Trade Commission estimates that, in 1998, the United States lost $43 billion and a million jobs due to espionage. As for bribery, the United States’ government documented 100 cases in one year (1995–1996), with a consequential loss of $45 billion in contracts for American firms. “Influence in Washington is just like in Indonesia. It’s for sale,” says the Japan Economic Journal in this respect. Finally, the America Manufacturing Policy Project puts the piracy rate of American intellectual property in China at 98%. Three days after Microsoft introduced Windows 95 in the United States for $89.95, copies were available throughout Asia for $4 or less (Buchanan, P. J.: ibid., pp. 49–50, 113, 306).Google Scholar
  118. 123.
    Held, D., et al.: Global Transformations, Polity Press, 1999, pp. 184–186.Google Scholar
  119. 124.
    Drucker, P.: Management Challenges for the 21st Century, Harper Collins Publishers, 1999, p. 157. Meanwhile, the entry-level offers to new college graduates in the American information and technology sector stagnated during the 1990s, whereas demands for salary increases resulted in threats to shift production to low-wage areas (Phillips, K.: ibid., p. 264). These threats have to be taken seriously, since the Indian government reported in 2001 that several hundred American technology firms already had foreign operations in Bangalore, while in 2000 approximately 75,000 Indian engineers were working in the United States (Phillips, K.: ibid., pp. 270–271). In this regard, Huntington states that since the 1960s Indian engineers have run more than 750 companies in Silicon Valley. Furthermore, a 2002 survey found that many of the Indian (and Chinese) high-skilled technocrats and entrepreneurs had “set up subsidiaries, joint ventures, subcontracting arrangements, or other business operations in their native countries” (Huntington, S. P.: Who are We? America’s Great Debate, ibid., p. 288). Meanwhile, China is booming. Per capita income in this country almost doubled over the period 1980–2000 and is now $4,000. In China, exports by the dynamic provinces on the coast increased from $17 million in 1981 to over $30 billion at present (Zakaria, F.: ibid., p. 75). The influence of countries like India, Taiwan, and China in the information age is so penetrating that one can wonder if the Western world might have missed this boat already. In this respect, Phillips presents revealing figures, demonstrating the influence of South-East Asia in the field of information technology. It appears that of the 400–500 top internet, telecom, chips, and networking firms in the world, dozens had CEOs from India, China, or Taiwan, and Silicon Valley is home to many executives and engineers from these countries. An economist from Berkeley counted 750 local companies run by Indians; and at the Cisco headquarters in San Jose, 45% of the workforce was Asian. Moreover, the Taiwanese computer industry, tied to the United States, produced 39% of the world’s disk drives in 2000, as well as 54% of all monitors, 93% of all scanners, 53% of all laptops, and 25% of all personal computers. Meanwhile, the Taiwanese are moving production to China for the simple reason that the price of labor on the mainland is only 25% to 35% of the Taiwanese level. At the same time, China produces 145,000 new engineers each year, while its computer market is growing 40% annually (Phillips, K.: ibid., pp. 289–290). In this respect, Gilpin observes that the extraordinary population decline in the industrialized world and the explosive population growth in China and other parts of Asia will alter the global distribution of economical and military power (Gilpin, R.: ibid., p. 15). Opponents of globalization believe this to be a very threatening development for several reasons. First of all, they point to the fact that the diffusion of industry from industrialised to industrialising economies takes place very rapidly and also includes advanced technologies like electronics and technologically sophisticated industries. The industrialized world has become dependent on these sophisticated industries, which are moving to southern industrializing economies, thus intensifying competition. Opponents of globalization fear that, if these industrializing economies cannot improve their lot in a market-oriented global economy, “they will surely develop the weaponry with which to destroy that economy” (Gilpin, R.: ibid., p. 40). Secondly, critics of globalization blame multinational corporations for accelerating the diffusion of sophisticated technologies in that they try to increase their international competitiveness by combining cheap labor of the South with the advanced manufacturing techniques of the North. Thirdly, the challenge this shift in manufacturing poses has been aggravated by the magnitude of the problem. Since the end of the Cold War, hundreds of millions of low-wage workers have entered the world labor pool, a thing that never happened before. Moreover, these new entrants are willing to forgo the welfare and health standards that Western workers demand (Gilpin, R.: ibid., pp. 37–38). European governments that take this observation seriously would have to reconsider the constraints they have imposed on their university education systems. Some European governments seem to realize this. For example, the Dutch government of 1994–1998 launched a national action program, of which tax reductions for employers for the costs of training their employees, equalling €114 million, were an essential part (Oosterbeek, H.: Waarom de Fiscus zich niet met Scholing moet Bemoeien, in: Dalen, H. van en Kalshoven, F., (eds.): ibid., pp. 66–67).Google Scholar
  120. 125.
    Frank, S.: ibid., pp. 66–67.Google Scholar
  121. 126.
    Research revealed that 42% of American workers feel exhausted by the end of the day (Gates, J.: ibid., p. 155).Google Scholar
  122. 127.
    Rifkin, J.: ibid.Google Scholar
  123. 128.
    Peter Drucker in: Rifkin, J.: ibid., p. 12.Google Scholar
  124. 129.
    Gilpin gives figures that show that, in 1960, the manufacturing sector in the United States accounted for 27% of GDP, a figure that had decreased to 15% by 1998. Consequently, the United States lost 2.6 million manufacturing jobs over the period 1980–1998 (Buchanan, P. J.: ibid., p. 13). As a consequence of the transformation into a service society, three-quarters of the American and Canadian workforces were employed in services at the end of the 20th century. The United States alone created (net) 44 million jobs, particularly in services and government, during the period 1972–1992 (Buchanan, P. J.: ibid., p. 37), a development which leaves the rest of the industrialized world far behind (Gilpin, R.: ibid., p. 33). Nevertheless, regarding the Netherlands, only 20% of the working population now works in industry, of which only half is really producing (Berenschot BV: ibid., p. 161).Google Scholar
  125. 130.
    Rifkin, J.: ibid., p. 291. For the production of services, the author expects a near-workerless era by the 2050s. He fears that the knowledge sectors in society can only partly absorb superfluous labor which, consequently, will mean that hundreds of millions of people will be permanently jobless through the combined effect of globalization and automation.Google Scholar
  126. 131.
    Reich, R. B.: The Future of Success, ibid.Google Scholar
  127. 132.
    Mittelman, J. H.: ibid., p. 16.Google Scholar
  128. 133.
    Gilpin, R.: ibid., pp. 31–32.Google Scholar
  129. 135.
    According to Hofstede, all jobs that are so predictable that they can be automated will disappear in the future. What will remain are those jobs that, by their nature, are not suitable for automation. Firstly, these are jobs that have to do with giving sense to the lives of individuals and society, and with determining human and societal objectives. These jobs include top management functions in politics and corporate business. Secondly, Hofstede distinguishes creative jobs like inventing new things, followed by testing them according to criteria with respect to their usefulness, beauty, and ethical aspects. Thirdly, there is a wide range of jobs that cannot be automated and that relate to things like safety, surveillance, defense, and maintenance. Finally, many jobs will remain in which human contact has a central position, i.e., managing, keeping people company, listening to them, supporting them materially and mentally, and motivating them to learn. Though computers can be used as tools in these jobs, they will never be able to replace humans, according to Hofstede (Hofstede, G.: ibid., pp. 138–139).Google Scholar
  130. 136.
    In 1967, Bell wrote that the average time between the development of a technological innovation and the recognition of its commercial opportunities decreased from 30 years between 1880 and 1919 to 16 between 1919 and 1945, and then to 9 years between 1945 and 1967. Since then, this time has further decreased to months rather than years for the most advanced technological products like computers and software (Fukuyama, F.: The End of History and the Last Man, ibid., p. 117).Google Scholar
  131. 137.
    Reich, R. B.: The Future of Success, ibid., p. 98.Google Scholar
  132. 138.
    In this respect, Fukuyama mentions that, in the 19th century, four out of five Americans were their own master. They did not participate in any bureaucratic organization. In the beginning of the 1990s, this ratio was one out of ten (Fukuyama, F.: The End of History and the Last Man, ibid., p. 102). Moreover, this absorption potential is also determined by the number of people who can afford the products that Reich’s domains will deliver.Google Scholar
  133. 139.
    Frank, S.: ibid., pp. 70–71.Google Scholar
  134. 140.
    Frank, S.: ibid., p. 68.Google Scholar
  135. 141.
    Frank, S.: ibid., p. 65.Google Scholar
  136. 142.
    Evans, Ph. and Wurster, Th. S.: ibid., chapter 10.Google Scholar
  137. 143.
    Evans, Ph. and Wurster, Th. S.: ibid., p. 210.Google Scholar
  138. 144.
    Leadbeater, C.: ibid., pp. 220–226.Google Scholar
  139. 145.
    Evans, Ph. and Wurtster, Th. S.: ibid., p. 221.Google Scholar
  140. 146.
    Hutton, W.: The State We’re In, Vintage Books, 1995, pp. 106–108.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2007

Personalised recommendations