Future Research

  • Risto SarvasEmail author
  • David M. Frohlich
Part of the Computer Supported Cooperative Work book series (CSCW)


In this final chapter, we reflect on what we see as the main lessons learnt for each of the three streams of academic literature we have brought together in this work: human–computer interaction, visual media studies, and science and technology studies. Most of the research lessons we recommend for these individual disciplines involve greater acknowledgement of each other’s contribution to understanding photography What we call for is a ‘meso’ level of study: looking at a single service or product from a broader perspective than typical design research does but at the same time having a closer focus than studies on organisations or industries. A meso perspective could pay more attention to the network of actors shaping technology, business, and practice in the context of a product or a service – from a historical perspective and from a contemporaneous perspective. In future research, new understandings will be needed that takes into account, for example, the increasing importance of non-visual data in photographs. We see the role and uses of metadata as a potentially fundamental change in people’s relationship to photographs and photography.


Business Model Technology Study Research Lesson Commercial Actor Business Factor 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Bijker WE, Hughes TP, Pinch TJ (1987) The Social construction of technological systems: new directions in the sociology and history of technology. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  2. Collins D (1990) The story of Kodak. H.N. Abrams, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  3. Hyysalo S (2010) Health technology development and use: from practice-bound imagination to evolving impacts. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  4. Jenkins R (1975) Images and enterprise: technology and the American photographic industry, 1839–1925. Johns Hopkins University Press, BaltimoreCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Lehmuskallio A, Sarvas R (2010) The agency of ICT in shaping non-professional photo use. In: Proceedings of the Nordic Network for Visual Studies in Social Science Workshop: from Family Album to Social Media – traditions and Change, Stockholm, 2010Google Scholar
  6. Munir KA, Jones M (2004) Discontinuity and after: the social dynamics of technology evolution and dominance. Organ Stud 25(4):561–581CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Norman D (2010) The way I see it: technology first, needs last: the research–product gulf. Interactions 17(2):38–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Wensberg PC (1987) Land’s Polaroid: a company and the man who invented it. Houghton Mifflin, BostonGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer London 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Helsinki Institute for Information Technology HIITAalto UniversityHelsinkiFinland
  2. 2.Digital World Research CentreUniversity of SurreyGuildfordUK

Personalised recommendations