Advertisement

The Current of Injury in Acute Myocardial Ischaemia

  • Michiel J. Janse
  • Ruben Coronel
Chapter
  • 5 Downloads

Abstract

The use of the term ‘current of injury’ may give rise to some misunder-standing. In classical studies on cardiac electrophysiology, part of the heart was deliberately injured by, e.g. locally applying heat, mechanical injury or chemical irritants, and recordings were made between an electrode placed on the injured part and one on the intact cardiac surface (Burdon-Sanderson and Page, 1879). Because of the potential difference between the injured part (equivalent to the intracellular compartment) and the intact surface (the extracellular space), a ‘current of injury’ would flow through a resistor connecting both parts. The effect on the recorded action potential was described by Burdon-Sanderson and Page as follows: ‘… if either of the leading-off contacts is injured … the initial phase is followed by an electrical condition in which the injured surface is more positive, or less negative relatively to the uninjured surface consequently the equilibrium which normally exists between all parts of the surface during the “isoelectric interval” is destroyed.’ In other words, instead of an extracellular electrogram, characterized by a QRS complex, an isoelectric ST segment and a T wave, one would record a ‘monophasic’ potential resembling a transmembrane action potential as recorded with a microelectrode. In the early part of this century, recordings of such ‘injury potentials’ or ‘monophasic potentials’ yielded a great many data on cardiac electrophysiology (see, for example, Schutz, 1931).

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. Burdon-Sanderson, J. and Page, F. J. M. (1879). On the time-relations of the excitatory process in the ventricle of the heart of the frog. J. Physiol., 2, 384–429CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Coronel, R., Wilms-Schopman, F., Opthof, T., Janse, M. and Van Capelle, F. J. L. (1990). Increased excitability in myocardium neighbouring acutely ischaemic tissue [abstract]. Eur. Heart J., 11 (Suppl.), 137Google Scholar
  3. Engelmann, Th.W. (1875). Ueber die Leitung der Erregung im Herzmuskel. Pflügers Arch., 11, 465–480CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Franz, M. R. (1983). Long-term recording of monophasic action potentials from human endocardium. Am. J. Cardiol., 51, 1629–1634PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Harris, A. S. (1950). Delayed development of ventricular ectopic rhythms following experimental coronary occlusion. Circulation, 1, 1318–1328PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Harris, A. S., Otero, H. and Bocagte, A. J. (1971). The induction of arrhythmias by sympathetic activity before and after occlusion of a coronary artery in the canine heart. J. Electrocardiol., 4, 34–43PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Hill, J. L. and Gettes, L. S. (1980). Effects of acute coronary artery occlusion on local myocardial K+ activity in swine. Circulation, 61, 768–778PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hoffman, B. F., Cranefield, P. F., Lepeschkin, E., Surawicz, B. and Herrlich, H. (1959). Comparison of cardiac monophasic action potentials recorded by intracellular and suction electrodes. Am. J. Physiol., 196, 1297–1301PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Janse, M. J. and Van Capelle, F. J. L. (1982). Electrotonic interactions across an inexcitable region as a cause of ectopic activity in acute regional myocardial ischemia. A study in intact porcine and canine hearts and computer models. Circ. Res., 50, 527–537PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Janse, M. J., Van Capelle, F. J. L., Morsink, H., Kléber, A. G., Wilms-Schopman, F. J. G., Cardinal, R., Naumann d’Alnoncourt, C. and Durrer, D. (1980). Flow of ‘injury’ current and patterns of excitation during early ventricular arrhythmias in acute regional myocardial ischemia in isolated porcine and canine hearts. Evidence for 2 different arrhythmogenic mechanisms. Circ. Res., 47, 151–165PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Janse, M. J. and Wit, A. L. (1989). Electrophysiological mechanisms of ventricular arrhythmias resulting from myocardial ischemia and infarction. Physiol. Rev., 69, 1049–1169PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Kléber, A. G. (1983). Resting membrane potential, extracellular potassium activity and intracellular sodium activity during global ischemia in isolated perfused guinea-pig hearts. Circ. Res., 52, 442–450PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kléber, A. G., Janse, M. J., Van Capelle, F. J. L. and Durrer, D. (1978). Mechanisms and time course of ST and TQ segment changes during acute regional myocardial ischemia in the pig heart determined by extracellular and intracellular recording. Circ. Res., 42, 603–613PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kléber, A. G., Riegger, C. B. and Janse, M. J. (1987). Electrical uncoupling and increase of extracellular resistance after induction of ischemia in isolated, arterially perfused rabbit papillary muscle. Circ. Res., 61, 271–279PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Olsson, S. B. (1971). Monophasic Action Potentials of Right Heart. Suction Electrode Method in Clinical Investigations. Elanders Boktryckeri Aktiebolag, Göteborg, SwedenGoogle Scholar
  16. Pogwizd, S. M. and Corr, P. B. (1987). Reentrant and non-reentrant mechanisms contribute to arrhythmogenesis during early myocardial ischemia: results using three-dimensional mapping. Circ. Res., 61, 352–371PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Schütz, E. (1931). Elektrophysiologie des Herzens bei einphasischer Ableitung. Ergeb. Physiol. Exp. Pharmakol., 38, 493–620CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Macmillan Publishers Limited 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michiel J. Janse
  • Ruben Coronel

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations