Muskellunge in Missouri: a 10 year strategic plan

  • Mark F. BooneEmail author
Original Paper
Part of the Developments in environmental biology of fishes 26 book series (DEBF, volume 26)


In 1995, a 10-year strategic plan for muskellunge program management in Missouri was developed by the Missouri Department of Conservation. Our mission was to efficiently produce and manage muskellunge in order to provide high-quality angling opportunities in suitable, well-distributed lakes throughout the state. The first goal was to increase the number and improve the distribution of muskellunge fisheries in small lakes. In 1995, our three existing muskellunge fisheries were in west central, northwest, and north Missouri. Six additional lakes were stocked with muskellunge from 1995 to 2001 in southeast, northeast, southwest, and central Missouri, plus the St. Louis area. The second goal was to maintain density and size structure of muskellunge populations commensurate with muskellunge angler expectations. Our objective was for muskellunge anglers to catch a muskellunge at least 91 cm (36 in.) in 20–40 h of angling. The Show-Me Muskie Project, a volunteer angler diary program, was initiated in 1996 to help evaluate this objective. The third goal was to inform Missouri anglers about increased opportunities for high-quality muskellunge fishing. We developed a muskellunge web page, created a release poster, updated our muskellunge brochure, published magazine articles, and mailed biannual letters to our Show-Me Muskie Project cooperators.


Missouri Muskellunge Strategic plan Accomplishments 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Anderson RO, Gutreuter SJ (1983) Length, weight, and associated structural indices. In: Nielson LA, Johnson DA, Lampton SS (eds) Fisheries techniques. American Fisheries Society, Bethesda, MD, pp. 283–300Google Scholar
  2. Axon JR (1978) An evaluation of the muskellunge fishery in cave run lake, Kentucky. Am Fish Soc Spec Publ 11:328–333Google Scholar
  3. Behnke RJ (1987) Catch and release: the last word. In: Barnhart RA, Roelofs TD (eds) Catch-and-release fishing: A decade of experience. Proceedings of a national sport fishing symposium, Humboldt State University, Arcata, CA, 30 September –1 October 1987, pp. 291–299Google Scholar
  4. Dent RJ (1986) A case history of voluntary catch and release of muskellunge with management implications for fishery programs. Am Fish Soc Spec Publ 15:316–322Google Scholar
  5. Eder LS (1987) Pony express lake management plan. Missouri Department of Conservation, St. Joseph, MOGoogle Scholar
  6. Hanson DA (1986) Population characteristics and angler use of muskellunge in eight northern Wisconsin lakes. Am Fish Soc Spec Publ 15:238–248Google Scholar
  7. Mooradian SR, Shepherd WF (1973) Management of muskellunge in Chautauqua Lake. NY Fish Game J 20:152–157Google Scholar
  8. Neuswanger DJ (1984) Hazel creek lake fishery management plan. Missouri Department of Conservation, Kirksville, MOGoogle Scholar
  9. Neuswanger DJ, Weithman AS, Kruse MS, Meade R, Suppes VC (1994) Muskellunge in Missouri: a ten-year strategic plan for program management. Missouri Department of Conservation, Cape Girardeau, MO, pp. 47Google Scholar
  10. Oehmcke AA (1986) Panel 2—private sector participation: the role of anglers and private organizations in muskellunge management. Am Fish Soc Spec Publ 15:323–334Google Scholar
  11. Younk JA, Cook MF (1992) Applications of an angler diary for muskellunge Esox masquinongy. Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, Investigational Report 420Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Missouri Department of ConservationCape GirardeauUSA

Personalised recommendations