Evaluation of temperature-selection differences among juvenile muskellunge originating from different latitudes

  • Curtis P. WagnerEmail author
  • David H. Wahl
Part of the Developments in environmental biology of fishes 26 book series (DEBF, volume 26)


Genetic differences among muskellunge Esox masquinongy populations are related to residence in major river drainages, suggesting the existence of divergent stocks. By use of radio-telemetry we compared different seasonal and diel temperature selection in a southern Illinois reservoir for three geographically and genetically distinct stocks of age-2 muskellunge from throughout the latitudinal range of the species. Muskellunge from the Upper Mississippi River drainage were represented by the Leech Lake, Minnesota, population and the Ohio River drainage was represented by the Cave Run Lake, Kentucky, population. Progeny from North Spring Lake, Illinois, an interstock, or mixed-origin stock, were also evaluated. No differences in temperature selection were observed among stocks of juvenile muskellunge across seasons or diel periods. The seasonal mean temperatures of the water varied significantly—spring 21.7°C, summer 28.4°C, and fall 14.8°C, with an overall average temperature of 24.1°C, in agreement with previously published values obtained in laboratory trials. This lack of different temperature-selection patterns among stocks is in contrast with other life-history characteristics, for example growth, metabolism, and conversion efficiency, which have been shown to differ among populations and stocks.


Esox masquinongy Temperature Stock differentiation Adaptation Physiology 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Altukhov YP (1981) The stock concept from the viewpoint of population genetics. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 38:1523–1538Google Scholar
  2. Anderson WG, McKinley RS, Colavecchia M (1997) The use of clove oil as an anesthetic for rainbow trout and its effects on swimming performance. North Am J Fish Manage 17:301–307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Angilletta MJ, Niewiarowski PH, Navas CA (2002) The evolution of thermal physiology in ectotherms. J␣Thermal Biol 27:249–268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Austen DJ, Petersen JT, Newman B, Sobaski ST, Bayley PB (1993) Compendium of 143 Illinois Lakes: Bathymetry, physico-chemical features, and habitats, Vol 2—Lakes of Regions 4 and 5. Aquatic Ecology Technical Report 93/9, Illinois Department of Natural Resources, Champaign, Illinois, USAGoogle Scholar
  5. Barwick DH, Foltz JW, Rankin DM (2004) Summer habitat use by rainbow trout and brown trout in Jocassee Reservoir. North Am J Fish Manage 24:735–740CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Begg GA, Friedland KD, Pearce JB (1999) Stock identification and its role in stock assessment and fisheries management: an overview. Fish Res 43:1–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Beitinger TL, Fitzpatrick LC (1979) Physiological and ecological correlates of preferred temperature: preferenda versus optima. Am Zool 19:319–329Google Scholar
  8. Beitinger TL, Magnuson JJ (1979) Growth rates and temperature selection of bluegill, Lepomis macrochirus. Trans Am Fish Soc 108:378–382CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Belk MC, Johnson JB, Wilson KW, Smith ME, Houston DD (2005) Variation in intrinsic individual growth rate among populations of leatherside chub (Snyderichthys copei Jordan & Gilbert): adaptation to temperature or length of growing season? Ecol Freshwater Fish 14:177–184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bettoli PW (2005) The fundamental thermal niche of adult landlocked striped bass. Trans Am Fish Soc 134:305–314CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bevelhimer MS (1996) Relative importance of temperature, food, and physical structure to habitat choice by smallmouth bass in laboratory experiments. Trans Am Fish Soc 125:274–283CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Box GEP, Anderson SL (1955) Permutation theory in the derivation of robust criteria and the study of departures from assumptions. J Roy Statist Soc B17:1– 34Google Scholar
  13. Brett JR (1971) Energetic responses of salmon to temperature: a study of some thermal relations in the physiology and freshwater ecology of sockeye salmon Oncorhynchus nerka. Am Zool 11:99–113Google Scholar
  14. Brown RS, Cooke SJ, Anderson WG, McKinley RS (1999) Evidence to challenge the ‘2% rule’ for biotelemetry. North Am J Fish Manage 19:867–871CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Burrell KH, Isely JJ, Bunnell DB, Van Lear DH, Dolloff CA (2000) Seasonal movement of brown trout in a southern Appalachian river. Trans Am Fish Soc 129:1373–1379CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Cheek TE, Van Den Avyle MJ, Coutant CC (1985) Influences of water quality on distribution of striped bass in a Tennessee River impoundment. Trans Am Fish Soc 114:67–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Clapp DF, Clark RD Jr, Diana JS (1990) Range, activity, and habitat of large, free-ranging brown trout in a Michigan stream. Trans Am Fish Soc 119:1022– 1034CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Clapp DF, Wahl DH (1996) Comparison of food consumption, growth, and metabolism among muskellunge—an investigation of population differentiation. Trans Am Fish Soc 125:402–410CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Conover DO, Present TMC (1990) Countergradient variation in growth rate: compensation for length of growing season among Atlantic silversides from different latitudes. Oecologia 83:316–324Google Scholar
  20. Conover DO, Schultz ET (1995) Phenotypic similarity and the evolutionary significance of countergradient variation. Trend Ecol Evol 10:248–252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Cooke SJ, Graeb BDS, Suski CD, Ostrand KG (2003) Effects of suture material on incision healing, growth and survival of juvenile largemouth bass implanted with miniature radio transmitters: case study of a novice and experienced fish surgeon. J Fish Biol 62:1366–1380CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Coutant CC (1975) Responses of bass to natural and artificial temperature regimes. In: Clepper H (ed) Black bass biology and managements. Sport Fishing Institute, Washington DC, USA, pp 272–285Google Scholar
  23. Coutant CC (1977) Compilation of temperature preference data. J Fish Res Board Can 34:739–745Google Scholar
  24. Coutant CC (1985) Striped bass, temperature, and dissolved oxygen: a speculative hypothesis for environmental risk. Trans Am Fish Soc 114:31–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Coutant CC (1987) Thermal preference: when does an asset become a liability? Environ Biol Fishes 18:161–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Coutant CC (1990) Temperature-oxygen habitat for fresh-water and coastal striped bass in a changing climate. Trans Am Fish Soc 119:240–253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Coutant CC, Carroll DS (1980) Temperatures occupied by ten ultrasonic-tagged striped bass in freshwater lakes. Trans Am Fish Soc 109:195–202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Crossman EJ (1978) Taxonomy and distribution of North American esocids. Am Fish Soc Special Publication 11:13–26Google Scholar
  29. Crossman EJ (1986) The noble muskellunge: a review. Am Fish Soc Special Publication 15:1–13Google Scholar
  30. Despatie SP, Castonguay M, Chabot D, Audet C (2001) Final thermal preferendum of Atlantic cod: effect of food ration. Trans Am Fish Soc 130:263–275CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Edsall TA (1999) Preferred temperatures of juvenile lake whitefish. J Great Lakes Res 25:583–588Google Scholar
  32. Freidenburg LK, Skelly DK (2004) Microgeographical variation in thermal preference by an amphibian. Ecol Lett 7:369–373CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Freund R, Little R, Spector P (1986) SAS system for linear models. SAS Institute, Cary, North Caroline, USAGoogle Scholar
  34. Fry FEJ (1971) The effect of environmental factors on the physiology of fish. In: Hoar WS, Randall DJ (eds) Fish physiology, vol 6. Academic Press, New York, New York, USA, pp 1–98Google Scholar
  35. Galarowicz TL, Wahl DH (2003) Differences in growth, consumption, and metabolism among walleyes from different latitudes. Trans Am Fish Soc 132:425–437CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Hall LW Jr, Hocutt CH, Stauffer JR Jr (1978) Implication of geographic location on temperature preference of white perch, Morone americana. J Fish Res Board Can 35:1464–1468Google Scholar
  37. Hanson DA, Margenau TL (1992) Movement, habitat selection, behavior, and survival of stocked muskellunge. North Am J Fish Manage 12:474–483CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Hassan KC, Spotila JR (1976) The effect of acclimation on the temperature tolerance of young muskellunge fry. In: Thermal Ecology II U.S. National Technological Information Services, CONF-750425, Springfield, Virginia, USA, pp 136–140Google Scholar
  39. Headrick MR, Carline RF (1993) Restricted summer habitat and growth of northern pike in two southern Ohio impoundments. Trans Am Fish Soc 122: 228–236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Hernandez M, Buckle LF, Espina S (2002) Temperature preference and acclimation in Poecilia sphenops (Pisces, Poeciliidae). Aquat Res 33:933–940CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Huey RB (1991) Physiological consequences of habitat selection. Am Nat 137: S91–S115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Ihssen PE, Booke HE, Casselman JM, McGlade JM, Payne NR, Utter FM (1981) Stock identification: materials and methods. Can J Fish Aquatic Sci 38:1838–1855Google Scholar
  43. Jepsen N, Beck S, Skov C, Koed A (2001) Behavior of pike (Esox lucius L.) >50 cm in a turbid reservoir and in a clearwater lake. Ecol Freshwater Fish 10:26–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Jobling M (1981) Temperature tolerance and the final preferendum—rapid methods for the assessment of optimum growth temperatures. J Fish Biol 19:439– 455CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Koppelman JB, Philipp DP (1986) Genetic application in muskellunge management. In: Hall GE (ed) Managing Muskies. American Fisheries Society Special Publication, 15 Bethesda, Maryland, USA, pp 111–121Google Scholar
  46. Koppelman JB, Whitt GS, Philipp DP (1988) Thermal preferenda of northern, Florida, and reciprocal F1 hybrid largemouth bass. Trans Am Fish Soc 117:238–244CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Levinton JS (1983) The latitudinal compensation hypothesis: growth data and a model of latitudinal growth differentiation based upon energy budgets. I. interspecific comparison of Ophryotrocha (Polychaeta: Dorvilleidae). Biol Bull (Woods Hole) 165:686–698CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Littell RC, Henry PR, Ammerman CB (1998) Statistical analysis of repeated measures data using SAS procedures. J Anim Sci 76:1216–1231PubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Maceina MJ, Bettoli PW, Devries DR (1994) Use of a split-plot analysis of variance design for repeated-measures fishery data. Fisheries 19:14–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. MacLean JA, Evans DO (1981) The stock concept, discreteness of fish stocks, and fisheries management. Can J Fish Aquatic Sci 38: 1889–1898Google Scholar
  51. MacLean JA, Evans DO, Martin NV, DesJardine RL (1981) Survival, growth, spawning distribution, and movements of introduced and native lake trout Salvelinus namaycush in two inland Ontario Lakes. Can J Fish Aquatic Sci 38:1685–1700CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Magee A, Myrick CA, Cech JJ (1999) Thermal preference of female threespine sticklebacks under fed and food-deprived conditions. Calif Fish Game 85:102–112Google Scholar
  53. Magnuson JJ, Crowder LB, Medvick PA (1979) Temperature as an ecological resource. Am Zool 19: 331–343Google Scholar
  54. Margenau TL, Hanson DA (1996) Survival and growth of stocked muskellunge: effects of genetic and environmental factors. Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources Research Report 172, pp 1–11Google Scholar
  55. Margenau TL, Hanson DA (1997) Performance of Leech Lake, Minnesota, muskellunge in a Wisconsin lake. Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources Research Report 175, pp. 1–11Google Scholar
  56. Markham JL, Johnson DL, Petering RW (1991) White crappie summer movements and habitat use in Delaware Reservoir, Ohio. North Am J Fish Manage 11:504–512CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Mayr E (1975) Population, species, and evolution. Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts and London, England 410 ppGoogle Scholar
  58. McCauley RW (1977) Laboratory methods for determining temperature preferences. J Fish Res Board Can 34:749–752Google Scholar
  59. McCauley RW, Casselman JM (1981) The final preferendum as an index of the temperature for optimum growth in fish. In: Proceedings of the world symposium on aquaculture in heated effluents and recirculation systems, vol 2. Student Aquaculture Association of the United Nations, Berlin, pp 81–93Google Scholar
  60. McCauley RW, Huggins NW (1979) Ontogenetic and nonthermal seasonal effects on thermal preferenda of fish. Am Zool 19:267–272Google Scholar
  61. Pearsons TN, Hopley CW (1999) A practical approach for assessing ecological risks associated with fish stocking programs. Fisheries 24:16–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Philipp DP, Whitt GS (1991) Survival and growth of northern, Florida, and reciprocal F1 hybrid largemouth bass in Central Illinois. Trans Am Fish Soc 120:58–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Philipp DP (1992) Stocking Florida largemouth bass outside of its native range. Trans Am Fish Soc 121:686–691CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Philipp DP, Epifanio JM, Jennings MJ (1993) Point counterpoint: conservation genetics and current stocking practices—are they compatible? Fisheries 18:14–17Google Scholar
  65. Philipp DP, Claussen JE (1995) Fitness and performance differences between two Stocks of largemouth bass from different river drainages within Illinois. Am Fish Soc Symposium 15:236–243Google Scholar
  66. Power M, McKinley RS (1997) Latitudinal variation in lake sturgeon size as related to the thermal opportunity for growth. Trans Am Fish Soc 126:549–558CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Reynolds WW, Casterlin ME (1976) Thermal preferenda and behavioral thermoregulation in three centrarchid fishes. In: Esch GW, McFarlane RW (eds) Thermal ecology II. U.S. National Technological Information Services, CONF-750425, Springfield, Virginia, USA, pp 185–190Google Scholar
  68. Reynolds WW, Casterlin ME (1979) Thermoregulatory rhythm in juvenile muskellunge (Esox masquinongy): evidence of a diel shift in the lower set-point. Comp Biochem Physiol 63A:523–525CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Reynolds WW (1977) Temperature as a proximate factor in orientation behavior. J Fish Res Board Can 34:734–739Google Scholar
  70. Richards FP, Reynolds WW, McCauley RW, Crawshaw LI, Coutant CC, Gift JJ (1977) Temperature preference studies in environmental impact assessments: an overview with procedural recommendations. J Fish Res Board Can 34:728–761Google Scholar
  71. Ross MJ, Kleiner CF (1982) Shielded-needle technique for surgically implanting radio-frequency transmitters in fish. Progr Fish Culturist 44:41–43Google Scholar
  72. SAS Institute Inc (1999) SAS OnlineDoc®, Version 8. Cary, North Carolina, USAGoogle Scholar
  73. Scott WB, Crossman EJ (1973) Freshwater fishes of Canada. Fisheries Research Board of Canada, Ottawa, CanadaGoogle Scholar
  74. Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ (1981) Biotelemetry. Freeman, New York, New York, USAGoogle Scholar
  75. Srivastava ABL (1959) Effects of non-normality of the power of the analysis of variance test. Biometrika 46:114–122Google Scholar
  76. Steel RGD, Torrie JH (1980) Analysis of covariance. In: Principles and procedures of statistics: a biometrical approach. McGraw–Hill, New York, pp 401–437Google Scholar
  77. Summerfelt RC, Smith LS (1990) Anesthesia, surgery, and related techniques. In: Schreck CB, Moyle PB (eds) Methods for fish biology. American Fisheries Society, Bethesda, Maryland, USA, pp 213–272Google Scholar
  78. Tiku ML (1971) Power function of F-test under non-normal situations. J Am Statist Assoc 66:913–916CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Tracy CR (1982) Biophysical modeling in reptilian physiology and ecology. In: Gans C, Pough FH (eds) Biology of the reptilia, volume 12, physiology C. Academic Press, London, pp 275 321Google Scholar
  80. Weller RR, Winter JD (2001) Seasonal variation in home range size and habitat use of flathead catfish in Buffalo Springs Lake, Texas. North Am J Fish Manage 21:792–800CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Winter JD (2000) Designing telemetry studies and other technical and analytical considerations. In: Eiler JH, Alcorn D, Neuman M (eds) Biotelemetry 15: Proceedings of the 15th International Society of Biotelemetry. Juneau, Alaska, U.S.A. International Society on Biotelemetry. Wageningen, the Netherlands, pp 229–247Google Scholar
  82. Yamahira K, Conover DO (2002) Intra- vs. interspecific latitudinal variation in growth: adaptation to temperature or seasonality? Ecology 83:1252–1262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Yandell BS (1997) Practical data analysis for designed experiments. Chapman & Hall, London UK 437 ppGoogle Scholar
  84. Younk JA, Strand RF (1992) Performance evaluation of four muskellunge Esox masquinongy strains in two Minnesota lakes. Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Section of Fisheries Investigational Report No. 418. 22 ppGoogle Scholar
  85. Zigler SJ, Dewey MR, Knights BC (1999) Movement and habitat use by paddlefish in Navigation Pool 8 of the upper Mississippi River. North Am J Fish Manage 19:180–187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Zigler SJ, Dewey MR, Knights BC, Runstrom AL, Steingraeber MT (2003) Movement and habitat use by radio-tagged paddlefish in the upper Mississippi River and tributaries. North Am J Fish Manage 23:189–205CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Kaskaskia Biological Station, Center for Aquatic Ecology and ConservationIllinois Natural History SurveySullivanUSA
  2. 2.Department of Natural Resources and Environmental SciencesUniversity of IllinoisChampaignUSA

Personalised recommendations